Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Together With Ideological And Administrative Opponents

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Together With Ideological And Administrative Opponents

    TOGETHER WITH IDEOLOGICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE OPPONENTS
    Anna Israelian

    Aravot.am
    20 May 06

    Specificities of the new-formed majority in the parliament according
    to the RPA soviet member, RPA fraction deputy Armen Ashotian.

    The RPA fraction leader Galust Sahakian has already declared publicly:
    Â"The field of mutual agreements is enlarged and others, Â"People's
    deputyÂ", ULP, will also get the existed levers. The ULP leader
    Gurgen Arsenian reminded Â"RegnumÂ" yesterday that the ULP was for
    Robert Kocharian's pre-electoral project and they would continue
    the collaboration. We also must remind that the ULP declared a "cold
    war" to the coalition in the enlarged sitting of the city soviet on
    22 of July, and Gurgen Arsenian promised that they would continue
    in a strong way. And more, he declared the ARF as the ideological
    opponent of the party, RPA as the administrative opponent, and partly
    the OEP. In this case how Gurgen Arsenian explains the readiness
    of collaborating with the ARF and RPA will be obvious after the
    sitting of the party soviet. But before we reminded the RPA fraction
    deputy Armen Ashotian the ULP these positions and were interested
    how he considered collaboration with the party which declared them a
    "cold war". "Political processes have a logic, clash or coincidence
    of interests, -Mr. Ashotian answered. - I think it is possible to
    find points of coincidence of interests with your mentioned political
    powers before parliamentary elections. It is wrong to exclude anything
    in the policy. The joint activities of the RPA and ARF with the ULP,
    'People's deputy" or new formed dep uty group, I think, will be by the
    principle of synthesizing of interests. If the coalition was formed
    by incompatible political powers, which signed an agreement round
    general strategic superiorities and were working for three years,
    then I don't exclude that collaboration will take place among these
    political powers though without that juridical formulation. I think
    the NA work will be continued in ordinary way and there will be no
    problem of decisive majority during voting as it will be solved on
    the principle of political agreements and coincidence of interests.Â"

    It is less possible but "People's deputy" can threaten the agreements,
    because its members don't intend to collaborate with the coalition. We
    should remind that though Â"People's deputyÂ" group was voting
    in decisive moments as the majority wanted, the head of the group
    Karen Karapetian was criticizing the coalition. Let's cite one of
    such examples; Karen Karapetian declared in last February that the
    coalition wasn't only able to lead the processes in ordinary way
    but it didn't want; Â"They have divided the authority by coalition
    principle and now each of them want to increase the percent of
    their authority by mutual accusations. It seems to me that these
    powers have come to power to feel good with their partiesÂ". The
    RPA soviet member answered to this that the interpretations are the
    same as it was in case of the ULP. Â"I'm sure that the RPA and ARF
    will find points of contacts round of which they can work even with
    the deputies of extreme demonstrationsÂ". And on this occasion he
    added a factor, which will stimulate the desire of collaboration
    of parliamentary powers. "Special elections aren't desirable for
    democratic development of the state. Though there were declarations,
    which excluded that threat, this circumstance will make political
    powers work together. The time and situation has been changed. And
    it is natural that other approaches are also possible".

    The expression of "principle of summarizing the interests" highly
    sounds but everything leads to the appointment of posts. Are they
    enough in the circumstance when some persons who left the OEP still
    continue to fill their posts?

    But the most important thing is that whether their behavior doesn't
    become standard. The RPA council member Armen Ashotian answered; I
    don't think that we deepen the incompleteness of political field as
    the political system can't reach to completeness only by these events."

    --Boundary_(ID_syYwuvOpba3HUoziGeKbfw)--

    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X