Tweet
WHO DOES HISTORY BELONG TO IF NOT THE HISTORIANS?
By Semih Idiz
Turkish Press
May 25 2006
MILLIYET- I said earlier that the bill to criminalize denial of the
so-called Armenian genocide would be passed by France's Parliament.
We can't say that it didn't pass. In other words, we can't say that
common sense won. Observers believe that the bill will pass if it comes
to a vote. Now people say the bill will be brought to the agenda by
the end of this year.
The French Armenians aren't satisfied with the situation either. They
would prefer for the bill to be passed in the General Assembly and
stay in legal procedures even if it's not accepted. Armenian Deputy
Partick Deveciyan lashed out at French Foreign Minister Philippe
Douste-Blazy. In his speech in Parliament, Balazy pointed to France's
important political and economic interests in its relations with Turkey
and said the bill should be rejected. Deveciyan branded Blazy's request
"unethical."
However, the French are concerned about their economy. Smart observers
know that foreign trade and foreign investment are very important
in their economy. In other word, they are aware that Blazy's words
aren't empty. If we come to 'ethical' Deveciyan, in light of the
French approach to Algeria, he is also aware that the bill isn't at
all ethical. He's already stated his views on history.
After being reminded how at least one leading French historian is
opposed to the bill, he said meaninglessly: 'History isn't the private
property of historians.'
Judging from the comments of French Armenians, this problem is
a political problem rather than a historical one. That's why the
Armenians are against Turkey' proposal for a commission of historians
which was also supported by Douste-Blazy. They try to base the problem
on demagogy. That's why Turkey hast to stick to its proposal.
But Ankara isn't doing much about this.
The fact that the Armenians didn't reach their goals this time doesn't
change the situation much, because there are third parties who want
to use this issue for their own interests.
By Semih Idiz
Turkish Press
May 25 2006
MILLIYET- I said earlier that the bill to criminalize denial of the
so-called Armenian genocide would be passed by France's Parliament.
We can't say that it didn't pass. In other words, we can't say that
common sense won. Observers believe that the bill will pass if it comes
to a vote. Now people say the bill will be brought to the agenda by
the end of this year.
The French Armenians aren't satisfied with the situation either. They
would prefer for the bill to be passed in the General Assembly and
stay in legal procedures even if it's not accepted. Armenian Deputy
Partick Deveciyan lashed out at French Foreign Minister Philippe
Douste-Blazy. In his speech in Parliament, Balazy pointed to France's
important political and economic interests in its relations with Turkey
and said the bill should be rejected. Deveciyan branded Blazy's request
"unethical."
However, the French are concerned about their economy. Smart observers
know that foreign trade and foreign investment are very important
in their economy. In other word, they are aware that Blazy's words
aren't empty. If we come to 'ethical' Deveciyan, in light of the
French approach to Algeria, he is also aware that the bill isn't at
all ethical. He's already stated his views on history.
After being reminded how at least one leading French historian is
opposed to the bill, he said meaninglessly: 'History isn't the private
property of historians.'
Judging from the comments of French Armenians, this problem is
a political problem rather than a historical one. That's why the
Armenians are against Turkey' proposal for a commission of historians
which was also supported by Douste-Blazy. They try to base the problem
on demagogy. That's why Turkey hast to stick to its proposal.
But Ankara isn't doing much about this.
The fact that the Armenians didn't reach their goals this time doesn't
change the situation much, because there are third parties who want
to use this issue for their own interests.