Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

More news from Corsham Madrassa.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • More news from Corsham Madrassa.

    British National Party, UK
    May 28 2006

    More news from Corsham Madrassa.


    Wiltshire correspondent reports.
    Strange logo to use in a school which is 99% white



    Earlier this week we presented some snippets from revision notes
    prepared for students studying for the GSCE modules of the Religious
    Education examination in Islam and Christianity. We explained,
    quoting from course material, how Islam was presented in a positive
    way, unlike Christianity - which was deliberately associated with
    racism, intolerance and slavery.

    We have today received the full revision booklets for both modules
    and shall make a number of further observations from them,
    particularly on that part of the Islam propaganda text entitled "The
    Life of Muhammad".

    The Life of Muhammad (Sanitised version).

    According to the text Muhammad "had a difficult start to life" his
    father dies before he was born, as does his mother when he is just
    6-years old. It also tells us that he was trusted, honest, kind,
    respected and a good businessman who liked to meditate. Sounds a real
    nice regular sort of guy to us!

    It also tells us how he, as a young man, married an ageing (wealthy?)
    widow - for reasons that are not explained but may be speculated
    upon. Apparently he took no other wives until after she had died (on
    her insistence?), at which time he was aged 49-years. Then, of
    course, he married an 8-year old girl by the name of Aisya, -
    something that would earn him quite a few years "inside" if repeated
    today! Strangely the revision notes make not the slightest reference
    of this well documented historical fact - yet has the effrontery to
    ask the questions: "Can Muhammad's example be followed in the 21st
    Century?" and "How is Muhammad a role model?" The mind boggles!

    The piece also tells us that Muhammad was opposed to the owning of
    slaves - which is peculiar bearing in mind Islam's thousand year
    pivotal role in that sordid industry - dealing in countless millions
    of slaves taken from the African interior and the southern shores of
    Europe! Again the revision text makes no mention of Islam as a major
    player in slavery down the centuries - nor of the centuries of
    Islamic slaving off our own Westcountry shores!

    We also learn from the text that "there were 2 very important battles
    (Badr and Uhud) before Muhammed took control of Makkah" and that he
    ensured that "all women and children were protected from the
    fighting". No mention here of the butchering of the prisoners taken
    at these battles or of bodies being dumped down local wells! No
    mention either of the looting of settlements, raiding of camel
    caravans for plunder and all the usual trappings of inter-tribal
    Arabian warfare including murder, rape, enslavement and mutilation!

    Regular readers may also recall, in our earlier report, how the Dutch
    Reform Church was held accountable in the accompanying revision notes
    on Christianity, for the evil of Apartheid in 1960's South Africa. To
    provide some balance you may reasonably have expected to find a
    condemnatory reference in the Islam revision notes relating to
    Islamic mass murder and ethnic cleansing down the centuries. But no -
    nothing! So why, we naively ask, is there no mention of the genocide
    of an estimated one million Christian Armenians by Turkish Muslims in
    the 1920's, or, perhaps a few lines on the mass murder of some 50,000
    Christian Greeks, at around the same time, in the former Greek town
    today known as Izmir! And if the compilers of the revision notes wish
    to make an historical reference more contemporarily with Christian
    Apartheid then perhaps they could use the example of Indian partition
    - where an estimated one million Sikhs and Hindus were butchered by
    Muslim fanaticc or of the Turkish Muslim invasion of Cyprus. As
    regards the latter to this day the Muslim Turkish authorities refuse
    to disclose what was done to over a thousand still missing Greek
    Christian prisoner taken during their illegal invasion? Once again
    none of this is even hinted at in the revision notes!

    Media maintains its silence.

    You would have thought that the media in Wiltshire would be "all
    over" the Corsham School and local education authority asking some
    probing questions in relation to what is being taught in that
    establishment and who, exactly, is doing the teaching. But no - not a
    word has yet appeared in print! Can it be that Wiltshire's editors
    and journalists don't agree with the premise that parents have a
    right to know what their kids are being exposed to?

    In addition the moribund Christian Church in Wiltshire has expressed
    no obvious interest in defending The Faith. They appear to believe
    that attending same-sex "weddings" between senior clergymen is of
    more importance! On the national scene can it be that the revelations
    of the past decade concerning buggering bishops and paedophile
    priests has so cowed all within that organization that they maintain
    a low profile for fear of more skeletons emerging from the closet?

    And if Christian patriots hold any expectation that the present
    "princes of the Church" will rise in defence of The Faith then they
    are to be sorely disappointed - nothing short of a new Reformation
    will put wrong to right!

    http://www.bnp.org.uk/reg_showarticle.php? contentID=980

    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X