Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Reporters Without Borders regrets adoption of French Law

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Reporters Without Borders regrets adoption of French Law

    Reporters without borders (press release), France
    Oct 14 2006


    Reporters Without Borders regrets adoption of law making it a crime
    to deny Turkish genocide against Armenians

    Reporters Without Borders can only regret the adoption by the French
    National Assembly, on 12 October 2006, of a draft law making denial
    of the Armenian genocide a crime. It will now be punishable by five
    years in jail and 45,000 euros fine.

    The law complements that of 19 January 2001 in which France publicly
    recognised the 1915 Armenian genocide.

    `There is obviously no question of going back on the recognition of
    the Armenian genocide, but legislating on it will expose anyone
    denying it to harsh judicial penalties set out by the 18 July 1881
    law on press freedom (Article 24a). Memorial laws contribute to the
    creation of an official historical truth. This practice is
    incompatible with France's fundamental values, starting with freedom
    of expression,' said the organisation.

    `Not only is it absurd that free expression - however contestable and
    that is not the question - should be submitted to a constraint which
    is also an additional threat, but it seems to us that this legalistic
    concept of history will be much more likely to stoke up antagonism
    rather than promote debate.

    `It is particularly symbolic that this vote should have been held on
    the same day of the awarding of the Nobel Prize for literature to
    Orhan Pamuk, who was himself taken to court by the Turkish
    authorities for having raised the issue of this genocide,' Reporters
    Without Borders stressed.

    Reporters Without Borders hopes that senators due to examine the law
    at the second reading, will show less attention to forthcoming
    elections and will have the wisdom to reject it. If not it could have
    incalculable consequences for all historians and of course for press
    freedom.
Working...
X