Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ANKARA: We Shouldn't Contribute To Rehn's Isolation

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ANKARA: We Shouldn't Contribute To Rehn's Isolation

    WE SHOULDN'T CONTRIBUTE TO REHN'S ISOLATION
    Selcuk Gultasli

    Zaman Online, Turkey
    Nov 21 2006

    Putting aside friction on the Cyprus issue, it's necessary to give
    enlargement commissioner Olli Rehn his due. In spite of the wave
    of anti-Turkish sentiment rising in Europe and pressure from many
    prominent European politicians who have turned enmity towards Turks
    into political empowerment, he kept a balance in the progress report
    that is worthy of commendation.

    What he said at the press conference while announcing the report
    was the best he could do. His words, "Contrary to what is widely
    believed in Europe, Turkey did not take a step backwards in its reform
    efforts; it continued the reforms last year, only at a slower pace,"
    disappointed Turkey's opponents from the start.

    Looking at the outcry of anti-Turkish activities across the board
    from Plassnik to Stoiber and from Merkel to the Armenian lobby, it
    is clear that expectations of a suspension in accession talks with
    Rehn's report have turned out to be mainly unfulfilled.

    Christian Democrats are bombarding Rehn with criticism because he
    didn't display the "brave" stand they showed in their reports blaming
    Turkey for two more genocides.

    The Armenian lobby reproached the Commission's "double standard"
    for not even including the expression, "1915's tragic events," which
    was in last year's progress report.

    A broad spectrum of Turkey's opponents, enemies, and racists have made
    an alliance to eliminate the influence and legitimacy of Rehn's report.

    Thus, showing the "daring" to delay his Cyprus recommendation for
    a month, Rehn is being pushed to prepare the recommendation in the
    most critical way, which is expected to be ready in December.

    The progress report and strategy paper crystallized at a point of
    balance keeping Cyprus and the reform process separate.

    While these two reports and the responses to them have mainly occupied
    the press, the Commission's new enlargement plan, which was published
    in the strategy paper, wasn't discussed much in Turkey.

    The real reason for Rehn explaining at length that the politics
    of enlargement was not a high-speed train, that the quality of the
    trip and the safety of the passengers were more important than the
    train's speed and that the aim was to arrive at the station without
    a derailment, is the reality that Europe's enlargement process is
    going to advance more slowly.

    It can be understood within the framework of the afore-mentioned
    plan that Turkey's candidacy, which already possesses the "heaviest"
    conditions, is going to be subject to closer scrutiny.

    Combining the EU's quite cautious approach slowly turning against
    enlargement with the Cyprus issue, using Rehn's metaphor, the front
    opposed to Turkey wants to derail Turkey from the track.

    It's necessary not to contribute to Rehn's isolation, who is trying
    to end Cyprus's isolation, on Turkey's account.

    Significant moves made outside of Cyprus before the December summit
    that would lighten up the Commission's recommendation would also be
    helpful to Rehn.

    Article 301 of the Turkish penal code has become an embarrassing
    monkey on Turkey's back but could be useful during this period. The
    only way for some 'good' to come out of 301 is for it to be either
    eliminated or amended.
Working...
X