Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Analysis: Armenia, Azerbaijan Confront The Return Of The Private Arm

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Analysis: Armenia, Azerbaijan Confront The Return Of The Private Arm

    Analysis: Armenia, Azerbaijan Confront The Return Of The Private Army
    By Liz Fuller

    Radio Free Europe, Czech Republic
    Feb 16 2005

    In the run-up to, and the years immediately following, the collapse of
    the USSR, private armies played a key role in political developments
    across the South Caucasus. Tengiz Kitovani's National Guard was
    instrumental in ousting Georgian President Zviad Gamsakhurdia in late
    1991. Soon afterward, together with Djaba Ioseliani's Mkhedrioni,
    Kitovani's group triggered wars in Abkhazia and South Ossetia.


    An informal militia subordinate to the Azerbaijan Popular Front helped
    thwart a comeback attempt in May 1992 by President Ayaz Mutalibov. A
    second private army helped rebel Colonel Suret Huseinov topple
    Mutalibov's successor, Abulfaz Elchibey, in June 1993, paving the way
    for the return to Baku of former Communist Party of Azerbaijan First
    Secretary Heidar Aliyev. And in Armenia, the Yerkrapah detachments
    formed by Vazgen Sargsian to fight in the Karabakh war rose to
    political prominence, catapulting Sargsian to the post of defense
    minister and then prime minister.

    Huseinov was effectively neutralized in early 1995, and Kitovani and
    Ioseliani by the end of that year. True, in Georgia guerrilla bands
    enjoying covert support from the Georgian government continued to
    target CIS peacekeepers and Abkhaz customs officials in Abkhazia --
    but at least those detachments were firmly under the control of the
    regime. Elsewhere in the South Caucasus, however, they appeared to
    have disbanded.

    A Reemergence?

    In recent weeks, however, there have been reports of the reemergence
    of such forces in both Azerbaijan and Armenia. In Azerbaijan, the
    independent daily newspaper "Azadliq" reported on 1 February that
    the CIA warned President Ilham Aliyev one month previously that the
    head of a government agency had allegedly created his own private
    army numbering 150-200 fighters with "advanced military training."
    "Azadlig" did not name the Azerbaijani official in question. Aliyev has
    since assured Washington that the army in question has been disarmed,
    according to "Azadliq." The paper claimed that the CIA's primary
    concern was that the militia in question could sabotage "strategic
    installations," possibly meaning the unfinished Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan
    oil pipeline or the Baku-Tbilisi-Erzerum gas pipeline.

    But such a private army could also be mobilized during the Azerbaijani
    parliamentary elections due in November. The daily "Vatandash
    Hamrayliyi" newspaper claimed on 9 February, citing governmental
    sources, that two powerful and wealthy government officials, State
    Customs Committee Chairman Kamaladdin Heydarov and Economic Development
    Minister Farhad Aliyev (no relation to the president), planned to
    create their personal blocs to participate in those elections.

    Trouble In Armenia

    In Yerevan, President Robert Kocharian's national security adviser,
    Garnik Isagulian, was quoted by "Hayots ashkhar" on 15 February as
    expressing concern over recent armed clashes between rival business
    clans and calling for immediate measures to put an end to such
    lawlessness. "Many of our wealthy persons have created bodyguard
    structures," Isagulian explained. "Some of them even have personal
    security services." One man died and two others were injured in
    the latest such shootout, on 4 February, apparently between armed
    supporters of rival "mafias" (see "Three Men Arrested After Deadly
    Shootout In Yerevan").

    On 8 February, the same paper reported unconfirmed rumors that
    individuals close to Yerevan officials or to past of present parliament
    deputies were involved in the 4 February gun battle. "Iravunk"
    for its part suggested that the Armenian authorities are powerless
    to control even those criminal "clans" whose members support them,
    and have consequently become hostages of that "criminal conglomerate."
Working...
X