Tweet
UN COMPLICIT IN GENOCIDE DENIAL
The Toronto Star, Canada
April 16, 2007 Monday
More than 90 years ago, when Turkey was still part of the Ottoman
Empire, Turkish nationalists launched an extermination campaign there
that killed 1.5 million Armenians.
It was the 20th century's first genocide. The world noticed, but
did nothing, setting an example that surely emboldened such later
practitioners as Hitler, the Hutu leaders of Rwanda in 1994 and
today's Sudanese president, Omar Hassan al-Bashir.
Turkey has long tried to deny the Armenian genocide. Even in the
modern-day Turkish republic, which was not a party to the killings,
using the word "genocide" in reference to these events is prosecuted
as a serious crime. Which makes it all the more disgraceful that
United Nations officials are bowing to Turkey's demands and blocking
the scheduled opening of an exhibit at UN headquarters commemorating
the 13th anniversary of the Rwandan genocide because it mentions the
mass murder of the Armenians.
Ankara was offended by a sentence that explained how genocide came to
be recognized as a crime under international law: "Following World
War I, during which 1 million Armenians were murdered in Turkey,
Polish lawyer Raphael Lemkin urged the League of Nations to recognize
crimes of barbarity as international crimes."
The exhibit's organizer, a British-based anti-genocide group, was
willing to omit the words "in Turkey." But that was not enough for
the UN's craven new leadership, and the exhibit has been indefinitely
postponed.
It's odd that Turkey's leaders have not figured out by now that
every time they try to censor discussion of the Armenian genocide,
they only bring wider attention to the subject and link today's
democratic Turkey with the now distant crime.
As for Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and his inexperienced new
leadership team, they have once again shown how much they have to learn
if they are to honourably and effectively serve the United Nations,
which is supposed to be the embodiment of international law and a
leading voice against genocide.
This is an edited version of an editorial that appeared Friday in
the New York Times.
The Toronto Star, Canada
April 16, 2007 Monday
More than 90 years ago, when Turkey was still part of the Ottoman
Empire, Turkish nationalists launched an extermination campaign there
that killed 1.5 million Armenians.
It was the 20th century's first genocide. The world noticed, but
did nothing, setting an example that surely emboldened such later
practitioners as Hitler, the Hutu leaders of Rwanda in 1994 and
today's Sudanese president, Omar Hassan al-Bashir.
Turkey has long tried to deny the Armenian genocide. Even in the
modern-day Turkish republic, which was not a party to the killings,
using the word "genocide" in reference to these events is prosecuted
as a serious crime. Which makes it all the more disgraceful that
United Nations officials are bowing to Turkey's demands and blocking
the scheduled opening of an exhibit at UN headquarters commemorating
the 13th anniversary of the Rwandan genocide because it mentions the
mass murder of the Armenians.
Ankara was offended by a sentence that explained how genocide came to
be recognized as a crime under international law: "Following World
War I, during which 1 million Armenians were murdered in Turkey,
Polish lawyer Raphael Lemkin urged the League of Nations to recognize
crimes of barbarity as international crimes."
The exhibit's organizer, a British-based anti-genocide group, was
willing to omit the words "in Turkey." But that was not enough for
the UN's craven new leadership, and the exhibit has been indefinitely
postponed.
It's odd that Turkey's leaders have not figured out by now that
every time they try to censor discussion of the Armenian genocide,
they only bring wider attention to the subject and link today's
democratic Turkey with the now distant crime.
As for Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and his inexperienced new
leadership team, they have once again shown how much they have to learn
if they are to honourably and effectively serve the United Nations,
which is supposed to be the embodiment of international law and a
leading voice against genocide.
This is an edited version of an editorial that appeared Friday in
the New York Times.