Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Radio Station 'Azatutyun' (Liberty) and Its New 'Criteria"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Radio Station 'Azatutyun' (Liberty) and Its New 'Criteria"

    THE RADIO-STATION 'AZATUTYUN' (LIBERTY) AND ITS NEW 'CRITERIA'

    AZG Armenian Daily #074, 21/04/2007

    I am sincerely surprised listening to the everyday news of the
    radio-station 'Azatutyun'. The most improbable thing to me was to hear
    mistakes and disinformation by this radio-station. Let's see a fragment
    of the evening broadcast of March 3 about the parliamentary elections
    in Armenia: 'Armenia is divided into 41 electoral districts. Each
    part is a separate theme of conversation. Which part is better,
    which is stony? Where and how much is 1m^2 of land?

    How many hectares of land can you reap and sow? What kind of neighbor
    fall to his lot? A relative, who is a General, or the respect that
    the candidate has, can do everything during the elections. Thus,
    we can understand that the votes are on the table, rolled in lavash
    (national bread)'.

    After this 'neutral' commentary-preface the news follows saying 'Only
    Samvel Babaian, one of the leaders of the parties, put forward his
    candidature by majority system'. Then the reporter contradicts himself
    and goes on: 'ARF (Dashnaktsutyun) and the opposition avoid putting up
    their candidates by majority system. Ararat Zurabian puts forward his
    candidature by majority system'. The reporter has forgotten that Ararat
    Zurabian is the leader of the opposite ANM (HHSH) party. Besides,
    the other leaders of the parties also take part in the parliamentary
    elections by majority system: i. e. Gagik Tsarukian, Manuk Gasparian,
    Hovhannes Hovhannisian, Khosrov Harutyunian, etc. Moreover, what about
    the ARF (Dashnaktsutyun), it does not avoid putting up its candidates
    by majority system. The party declares that their principle is to
    form the parliament only by proportional representation, and they
    have only one candidate by majority system.

    After these lines, our point of view about the high professionalism
    of the reporters of 'Azatutyun' radio-station blows up.

    On March 6, in the evening broadcast the reporter mocks at the
    elections saying: 'Please agree, we speak so much about the clean
    and just elections that we are even afraid of it. What if the
    elections don't be clean and pure? Will Mr. Bush strike Iran, or
    Putin's daughter marry Sahakashvili's son, after that? In any case,
    the authorities will not have right to declare that everything is
    transparent. We do not speak about the opposition, as its point of
    view is nothing for anyone. Sorry, only once the Constitutional Court
    took into consideration the opinion of the opposition, and even the
    Court was afraid of the boldness of itself.

    Anyhow, the last word is up to the observers'.

    We come to a conclusion from the above-mentioned, that the
    radio-station 'Azatutyun' has not qualified reporters to do political
    analyses.

    What about Iran, all the media, especially the Russian one, was talking
    about the strike that USA intended to realize against Iran. They
    declare even the day and the time of the strike. Being one of the
    neighbors of Iran the anxiety about this was big in Armenia, too.

    Nevertheless, 'Azatutyun' radio-station didn't say a word and didn't
    do any analyses and commentaries.

    Probably I would not return to this theme if I did not read an
    article in 'Haykakan jamanak' daily about the former worker of
    'Azatutyun' radio-station Anna Karapetian. She told the reporter that
    she was dismissed from her job even being the 12 years' worker of the
    radio-station. Anna Karapetian is a well-known professional reporter
    and if she does not satisfy the requirements of the radio-station,
    it means that the criteria of the radio-station were changed and the
    radio-station needs non-qualified reporters only who do mistakes and
    spread disinformation.

    In order to show that the elections in Armenia are not as disgraced as
    'Azatutyun' radio-station represents, we want to show some fragments
    from the broadcast of the radio-station: UN Security Council has only
    five members, Bagoto is the capital of Columbia, there are no other
    countries in the world, besides Armenia, that demand taxes for the
    import of alcohol, Serj Sargsian held the tenure of Prime Minister
    before the funeral of Andranik Margarian, and 'Surb Khach' Church
    of Akhtamar has never had any pilgrim and incense-bearer before the
    reconstruction by Turkey.

    Let us examine another example. In the broadcast of April 1 we heard
    the opinion of the actor Levon Sharafian (living now in Los Angeles)
    about the 'Armenia' pan-Armenian fund. From his point of view,
    building the roads is a way of making money. No one wants to open a
    dining-hall for the hungry people.

    Levon Sharafian left our country in 1995 and he has Armenia of 1995
    in his mind, when in the axis of the social policy of the country
    was the opening of charity dining-halls. If not the reporter, but the
    editor had to know that 'Armenia' pan-Armenian fund was established
    to build roads which have a strategic role for our country, and not
    to open dining-halls.

    The actor could be ill-informed, but not the reporter, who had to be
    informed and select a right interlocutor.

    Thus, we can say that 'Azatutyun' radio-station is interested in not
    giving the right information to the auditor, but to make its broadcast
    full of disinformation.

    New criteria are defined for 'Azatutyun' radio-station that have
    nothing to do with professional journalism.

    By Sara Petrosian
Working...
X