Tweet
HOW ETHNO-POLITICS POISONS DEMOCRACY
Naresh Raghubeer, National Post
National Post (Canada)
National Edition
July 31, 2007 Tuesday
Last week, Ontario Auditor-General Jim McCarter reported that the
province's Immigration and Citizenship Ministry has been dispensing
millions of dollars in grants to ethnic groups under a process that is
"not open, transparent or accountable." In many cases, groups got money
simply because their members were chummy with ministry insiders. "In
essence, the decisions behind 'who got what' were often based on
conversations, not applications," Mr. McCarter concluded.
But Mr. McCarter's report does not merely highlight a failure of
process in an otherwise sound government disbursement program. What
the Auditor-General documents is nothing less than a taxpayer-funded
political black market based on "ethnic" and religious vote-buying.
Dalton McGuinty's government marked the 2006 and 2007 fiscal year-end
by rushing $32.5-million dollars out the treasury's door.
Destination: cultural and religious groups likely to vote Liberal in
the coming October elections.
2007 grant recipients included: - Islamic Institute of Toronto
($500,000) - St. George Arab Cultural Centre ($300,000) - Bengali
Community Centre ($250,000) - Armenian Community Centre ($500,000)
- Six Sikh temples ($750,000) - Chinese Professional Association
($250,000 ) - Museum of Hindu Civilization ($200,000) - Sri Sathya Sai
Baba Centre of Toronto, ($250,000) - United Jewish Appeal ($15 million)
Most astonishingly, the McGuinty government also threw a million dollar
grant at the Ontario Cricket Association -- a sum that was $850,000
more than the Association itself had requested. The Iranian-Canadian
Community Centre's $200,000 grant was disbursed despite there being
"no written request for funding." In some cases, the spectre of
a political quid pro quo was overt: The $250,000 that went to the
Chinese Professional Association of Canada (CPAC) was delivered just
a few months after 10 CPAC board members attended a fundraiser for
the Minister of Immigration and Citizenship, Mike Colle (who has
since resigned). A CPAC board member also worked in the Minister's
office. Small world.
Awestruck Sikhs beheld $250,000 landing in a temple that was embroiled
in a court battle over the alleged mismanagement of funds.
Meanwhile, two grants of $100,000 each went to Sikh gurdwaras in
Malton and Rexdale, where certain Sikh devotees promote the Khalistan
movement and push to break up India. Photos of Sikh "martyrs" cover
the Malton Gurdwara's walls. Even an image of Talwinder Singh Parmar
is posted there, despite his masterminding 329 murders --including
280 Canadians and 136 children -- in the 1985 Air India bombing, the
worst terrorist attack in this nation's history. It is the equivalent
of funding a mosque that venerates Osama bin Laden.
The quest for votes means politicians are less willing to differentiate
between moderates and extremists: Whoever is seen to control the
microphone at the local temple -- and is therefore in a position
to guide voting decisions -- gets the cash. Hence, federal and
provincial politicians now shamelessly attend Sikh and Tamil events
where terrorists are glorified. The same phenomenon may well explain
why Liberal leader Stephane Dion had his party vote down crucial
expiring provisions of the Anti-Terrorism Act, a law introduced by
his own party in 2001. This placated the Muslim and Sikh supporters
who helped him win the Liberal leadership. They know the Act's demise
will help scuttle the RCMP's last chance to definitively fix guilt
in the Sikh terrorist plot against Air India Flight 182, and thereby
deny any sense of closure to the families of the murdered victims.
Canada's federal Conservatives can't resist, either, it seems. Last
October, Mr. Harper turned over $30-million and Ottawa's venerable
old War Museum building to establish the Centre for Global Pluralism.
The Centre is to be captained by the Aga Khan, the spiritual leader
of 15 million Shia Ismaili Muslims. How will our government react
when much larger religious groups, such as Sunni Muslims, Hindus,
Sikhs, Jews or Christians show up, wanting to establish similar
international centres?
Meanwhile, back in Ontario, how have things gone since former citizen
and immigration minister Mike Colle fell on his sword? In response
to aggressive lobbying by Muslim and Jewish community members,
Conservative Leader John Tory is promising $400-million to religious
schools -- with the hope that religious votes will carry him to
Ontario's premiership in October.
Whose interest is served when politicians play vote-bank politics with
Canadian tax dollars? We risk importing into Canada the tribal politics
that afflict the countries from which many of our immigrants have fled.
We also risk melding the realms of state and religion. This is a
mixture that apparently appalls "progressive" Canadians when the
religion at issue is Christianity. Why should the phenomenon be any
less pernicious when the faith is Islam, Hinduism, Judaism or Sikhism?
Mr. McCarter's report is a warning that should be heeded not only
in Ontario, but all across Canada. Canadians are justly proud to
live in a country where people can practice their privately held
faiths freely. The private sphere is where such matters should remain:
Publicly funded programs that subsidize religious and ethnic groups may
benefit a handful of well-connected organizations. But our democracy
as a whole becomes impoverished in the process. - Naresh Raghubeer
is executive director with the Canadian Coalition for Democracies, a
non-partisan, multi-ethnic, multi-religious organization of concerned
Canadians dedicated to human rights, national security and the
promotion of democracy.
Naresh Raghubeer, National Post
National Post (Canada)
National Edition
July 31, 2007 Tuesday
Last week, Ontario Auditor-General Jim McCarter reported that the
province's Immigration and Citizenship Ministry has been dispensing
millions of dollars in grants to ethnic groups under a process that is
"not open, transparent or accountable." In many cases, groups got money
simply because their members were chummy with ministry insiders. "In
essence, the decisions behind 'who got what' were often based on
conversations, not applications," Mr. McCarter concluded.
But Mr. McCarter's report does not merely highlight a failure of
process in an otherwise sound government disbursement program. What
the Auditor-General documents is nothing less than a taxpayer-funded
political black market based on "ethnic" and religious vote-buying.
Dalton McGuinty's government marked the 2006 and 2007 fiscal year-end
by rushing $32.5-million dollars out the treasury's door.
Destination: cultural and religious groups likely to vote Liberal in
the coming October elections.
2007 grant recipients included: - Islamic Institute of Toronto
($500,000) - St. George Arab Cultural Centre ($300,000) - Bengali
Community Centre ($250,000) - Armenian Community Centre ($500,000)
- Six Sikh temples ($750,000) - Chinese Professional Association
($250,000 ) - Museum of Hindu Civilization ($200,000) - Sri Sathya Sai
Baba Centre of Toronto, ($250,000) - United Jewish Appeal ($15 million)
Most astonishingly, the McGuinty government also threw a million dollar
grant at the Ontario Cricket Association -- a sum that was $850,000
more than the Association itself had requested. The Iranian-Canadian
Community Centre's $200,000 grant was disbursed despite there being
"no written request for funding." In some cases, the spectre of
a political quid pro quo was overt: The $250,000 that went to the
Chinese Professional Association of Canada (CPAC) was delivered just
a few months after 10 CPAC board members attended a fundraiser for
the Minister of Immigration and Citizenship, Mike Colle (who has
since resigned). A CPAC board member also worked in the Minister's
office. Small world.
Awestruck Sikhs beheld $250,000 landing in a temple that was embroiled
in a court battle over the alleged mismanagement of funds.
Meanwhile, two grants of $100,000 each went to Sikh gurdwaras in
Malton and Rexdale, where certain Sikh devotees promote the Khalistan
movement and push to break up India. Photos of Sikh "martyrs" cover
the Malton Gurdwara's walls. Even an image of Talwinder Singh Parmar
is posted there, despite his masterminding 329 murders --including
280 Canadians and 136 children -- in the 1985 Air India bombing, the
worst terrorist attack in this nation's history. It is the equivalent
of funding a mosque that venerates Osama bin Laden.
The quest for votes means politicians are less willing to differentiate
between moderates and extremists: Whoever is seen to control the
microphone at the local temple -- and is therefore in a position
to guide voting decisions -- gets the cash. Hence, federal and
provincial politicians now shamelessly attend Sikh and Tamil events
where terrorists are glorified. The same phenomenon may well explain
why Liberal leader Stephane Dion had his party vote down crucial
expiring provisions of the Anti-Terrorism Act, a law introduced by
his own party in 2001. This placated the Muslim and Sikh supporters
who helped him win the Liberal leadership. They know the Act's demise
will help scuttle the RCMP's last chance to definitively fix guilt
in the Sikh terrorist plot against Air India Flight 182, and thereby
deny any sense of closure to the families of the murdered victims.
Canada's federal Conservatives can't resist, either, it seems. Last
October, Mr. Harper turned over $30-million and Ottawa's venerable
old War Museum building to establish the Centre for Global Pluralism.
The Centre is to be captained by the Aga Khan, the spiritual leader
of 15 million Shia Ismaili Muslims. How will our government react
when much larger religious groups, such as Sunni Muslims, Hindus,
Sikhs, Jews or Christians show up, wanting to establish similar
international centres?
Meanwhile, back in Ontario, how have things gone since former citizen
and immigration minister Mike Colle fell on his sword? In response
to aggressive lobbying by Muslim and Jewish community members,
Conservative Leader John Tory is promising $400-million to religious
schools -- with the hope that religious votes will carry him to
Ontario's premiership in October.
Whose interest is served when politicians play vote-bank politics with
Canadian tax dollars? We risk importing into Canada the tribal politics
that afflict the countries from which many of our immigrants have fled.
We also risk melding the realms of state and religion. This is a
mixture that apparently appalls "progressive" Canadians when the
religion at issue is Christianity. Why should the phenomenon be any
less pernicious when the faith is Islam, Hinduism, Judaism or Sikhism?
Mr. McCarter's report is a warning that should be heeded not only
in Ontario, but all across Canada. Canadians are justly proud to
live in a country where people can practice their privately held
faiths freely. The private sphere is where such matters should remain:
Publicly funded programs that subsidize religious and ethnic groups may
benefit a handful of well-connected organizations. But our democracy
as a whole becomes impoverished in the process. - Naresh Raghubeer
is executive director with the Canadian Coalition for Democracies, a
non-partisan, multi-ethnic, multi-religious organization of concerned
Canadians dedicated to human rights, national security and the
promotion of democracy.