Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Armenian-Turkish Relations: Problems And Perspectives

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Armenian-Turkish Relations: Problems And Perspectives

    ARMENIAN-TURKISH RELATIONS: PROBLEMS AND PERSPECTIVES
    Haroutyun Gevorkyan

    Hayots Ashkharh, Armenia
    Dec 20 2007

    By the initiative of the NA Committee on Foreign Relations, yesterday
    the Parliament started the two-day hearings devoted to the theme
    "Armenian-Turkish Relations: Problems and Perspectives"

    ONLY IN FRIENDLY CONDITIONS

    Foreign Minister VARDAN OSKANYAN introduced Armenia's attitudes towards
    the relationship with Turkey. "The difficulty of the Armenian-Turkish
    relations is on the one hand conditioned with the burden of the past
    and on the other hand - with the imperative of living in the same
    region together, in conditions of peace, security and stability,
    and establishing friendly relations. The challenge is to synthesize
    the past with the present and future.

    Armenia is sure that the problems of the past are possible to solve
    only in conditions of establishing friendly relations between the
    two countries, when the borders are open and there are diplomatic ties.

    Turkey, on the contrary, wishes to establish diplomatic ties and open
    the borders only after solving all the problems of the past the way
    it desires. Armenia does not advance any preconditions, while Turkey
    insists on preconditions: settling the Karabakh conflict or, at least,
    returning the neighboring territories to Azerbaijan, recognizing the
    borders of Turkey and waiving the recognition of the Armenian Genocide.

    All the three preconditions do not stand any criticism from the point
    of view of international law.

    TURKEY -A CLASSICAL EXAMPLE OF TOTALITARIANISM

    NA Vice-Speaker VAHAN HIVHANNISYAN, member of the ARFD Bureau,
    viewed the Armenian Turkish relations purely from the angle national
    and political interests and stated that the situation has come to
    a deadlock.

    "A great number of regional and geopolitical obstacles are
    being mentioned in terms of introducing final clarifications in
    the Armenian-Turkish conflict. Whereas it is clear that no mutual
    agreement can be reached between democracy and dictatorship. Armenia
    is not a country of classical democracy, while Turkey is a classical
    example of dictatorship and totalitarianism.

    Even if Turkey waives the preconditions it has advanced, no dialogue
    will be possible as long as Kemal Ataturk, Taleat Pasha, Enver,
    Nazim and Jemal are considered to be heroes and not murderers.

    Changing the Turkish society is the only way out. Armenia has no
    problems in terms of searching new solutions, because it has already
    said what it had to say.

    V. Hovhannisyan also had doubts as to the fact there might be purely
    positive expectations from a neighboring country which is a member
    to the European Union. "That Turkey mustn't be allowed to become an
    EU member under any circumstances is a radical opinion. As to the
    opinion that Turkey's membership to the European Union is only for
    the good of Armenia, this approach is radical too. The whole question
    is how Turkey will join the European Union: whether it will change
    or remain in the present-day status.

    If the European Union is going to admit Turkey to its family, having no
    other way out as a result of a political calculation, Turkey will no
    longer have any reason to change. As a result, instead of Turkey's
    adopting the European value system, Europe will have to introduce
    quite a new system of values. This will, after all, lead to the
    collapse of the European Union.
Working...
X