Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ANKARA: What happened in Turkey and what did not in 2007?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ANKARA: What happened in Turkey and what did not in 2007?

    Today's Zaman, Turkey
    Dec 31 2007


    What happened in Turkey and what did not in 2007? (2)

    BULENT KENES

    It was the first day of 2002. A friend of mine gave me a call at an
    early morning hour, wished me a happy new year and then asked me how
    I was doing. After 2001, marked by uncertainty and dominated by
    crises, bankruptcies and layoffs, I remember saying to my friend in
    the first hours of the new year precisely this: `Well, what else
    could I be doing? Just trying to get through 2002 as quickly as I
    can.'
    Just like in the first days of 2002, 2007 signaled from the very
    first day that it would be a year we'd have to get through. Strangely
    enough, there was neither a political crisis nor an economic one as
    we left 2006 behind for 2007; there was also no mass bankruptcies nor
    chaotic events. Just the opposite, the economy was booming and income
    per capita was increasing by the day. Turkey was flourishing. And
    Turkish democracy, although at a slow pace, was making progress
    thanks to serious civil reforms enacted on the way to the European
    Union. The unrest did not stem from any of these; indeed, it came
    from the fact that the presidential election would be held in 2007,
    and this election was enough to stir up political fears in a country
    like Turkey.

    And all the fears were soon proven to have not been unfounded, and
    2007 turned out to be a year that was very hard on Turkey. However, I
    can say with peace of mind in this last day of the year that 2007 has
    been a critical turning point, for coming up with solutions to all
    our acute problems caused by our defective democracy and for our
    democratization adventure. I'm positive that history will record this
    determination as an accurate one. Even though we may have faced a
    wide range of anxieties, we will remember 2007 as a passageway to a
    more mature Turkish democracy, to a more civil and participative
    understanding in the administration and as a door opening to a
    serious opportunity to put an end to the trouble of terrorism.

    In my previous column, I recalled what did not happen in 2007 and
    promised to write about what has happened this year. I should first
    of all note that 2007 has been a difficult year for the journalism
    profession. It has been a year during which we -- among our
    journalist friends -- frequently joked that `we consume so much
    material in one day; material that countries like Norway and Sweden
    couldn't find in a year.' As a matter of fact, we experienced days in
    2007 such that we were forced into changing our headline topic hour
    by hour. If we are to remember those politically hot days, we can
    note the following:

    This may be a little personal, but I became a father twice in 2007,
    in two very important ways. After a magnificent celebration, Today's
    Zaman began its publishing life on Jan. 16 under my direction.
    Although it was only its first year, it played a historic role in
    causing the critical developments of 2007 to be correctly perceived
    abroad and among foreigners in Turkey. And in this long year, I
    tasted the sweet feeling of becoming a father for the second time
    with the birth of my daughter Elif Leyla.

    Of course, not all the events that occurred were as happy as these
    two. The first tragic incident of 2007, which was expected to be
    marked by provocations and high tension because of the presidential
    elections to be held, was the killing of Turkish journalist of
    Armenian descent Hrant Dink. If there is a single positive aspect to
    this, it must be that it aroused a nationwide mass reaction against
    the assassination. The positive atmosphere that developed around
    civil society organizations and citizens claiming Dink, regardless of
    his ethnic background, was as important as the negative atmosphere
    created by the state's reluctance to delve into the dark structure
    behind his murder.

    The first half of 2007 saw many opposition rallies with high
    participation. Acting on the paranoid fallacy that the republic and
    secularism were under imminent threat, tens of thousands took to the
    squares with a single target in mind -- to prevent anyone nominated
    by the Justice and Development Party (AK Party) from residing in the
    Çankaya presidential palace for seven years. The main slogan they
    kept chanting during these rallies, where they claimed that the
    government did not represent the bigger portion of the society, was
    `Tayyip look at us and count how many we are!' Organized by retired
    generals remembered for their unrealized coup plans during their
    terms of service, these rallies caused the tension in the country to
    rise, thereby providing an important ground for those endeavoring to
    stop the presidential election through anti-democratic methods.

    Amid this political pandemonium, they fabricated an absolutely
    nonsensical formula that did not exist in established practice --
    that the quorum to hold a parliamentary session was 367. The
    Constitutional Court approved of this cock-and-bull formula, under
    heavy pressure from the propaganda of the elitist clique and the
    military's midnight e-memo. Therefore, the government decided to head
    for early elections. What reversed that dark process, which gave
    serious signals that Turkey was about to go off the rails of
    democracy, was the ballot box, the temple of democracy.

    The results of the July 22 elections shattered all the dark plots to
    pieces in an atmosphere marked by bellows of rage in relation to the
    fallacy that the republic and secularism were under threat, by
    efforts to give a new shape to politics with interventions made from
    outside and by escalating terrorist attacks, which put great pressure
    on Turkey to carry out a cross-border military operation. Above all,
    the whole of Turkey and the world found the answers to the slogans
    chanted at the rallies called `republican' and clearly saw that this
    rally-loving disgruntled group was only a marginal segment of
    society.

    All the plans belonging to the main opposition party fell through.
    While the Republican People's Party (CHP) lost a good deal of the
    trust placed in it due to its strategy of tension and emerged from
    the elections suffering great political devastation, the Nationalist
    Movement Party (MHP) and the Democratic Society Party (DTP), which
    obtained the chance to enter Parliament after the passage of some
    years, acted differently from the CHP. The first candidate in the
    process, Abdullah Gül, was elected to the country's highest post, for
    the sake of which so many crises were sparked. Parallel to this
    election, a process of drafting a civil constitution started. An
    intensive political and diplomatic effort was exerted for the
    cross-border operation. Although some tried to abuse the cross-border
    operation plans in order to change the political balances in the
    country prior to the general elections, it was launched in December
    with accurate planning, correct timing and a proper method.

    Turkey became the scene of many other historic developments -- so
    many that we cannot list all of them here -- as well as many
    provocations and dark events. However, the obvious winner of 2007 is
    democracy. Now, I can easily remark that I don't view 2008 as a year
    we have to get through, and I hope that it will be year to be enjoyed
    by everybody to the fullest. Happy New Year.
Working...
X