Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ANCA Testimony Urges U.S. Action to End to Cycle of Genocide

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ANCA Testimony Urges U.S. Action to End to Cycle of Genocide

    Armenian National Committee of America
    1711 N Street NW
    Washington, DC 20036
    Tel. (202) 775-1918
    Fax. (202) 775-5648
    Email [email protected]
    Internet www.anca.org

    PRESS RELEASE

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    February 5, 2007
    Contact: Elizabeth S. Chouldjian
    (202) 775-1918

    ANCA TESTIMONY TO SENATE PANEL CALLS FOR
    U.S. LEADERSHIP IN ENDING THE CYCLE OF GENOCIDE

    -- New Senate Judiciary Human Rights Subcommittee Holds
    Inaugural Hearing on "Genocide and the Rule of Law"

    WASHINGTON, DC -- The Armenian National Committee of America
    (ANCA), in testimony submitted today to a key U.S. Senate Judiciary
    panel, called for an end to U.S. complicity in Turkey's denial of
    the Armenian Genocide, and concrete steps to end the ongoing
    genocide in Darfur.

    The ANCA's written testimony was submitted as part of the inaugural
    hearing of the newly created Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Human
    Rights and Law, titled "Genocide and the Rule of Law", which
    included remarks by Canadian Senator Romeo Dallaire, Deputy
    Assistant Attorney General Sigal Mandelker, actor and activist Don
    Cheadle, and American University College of Law Professor Diane F.
    Orentlicher.

    "Today, as we witness the genocide unfolding in Darfur, it has
    become increasingly clear that the failure of the international
    community, over the course of the past century, to confront and
    punish genocide has created an environment of impunity in which the
    brutal cycle of genocide continues," began ANCA Executive Director
    Aram Hamparian, in his testimony.

    Hamparian cited the history of U.S. complicity in Turkey's 92-year
    campaign of genocide denial, most recently through the firing of
    former Ambassador to Armenia John Marshall Evans for properly
    characterizing the Armenian Genocide as 'genocide,' and the re-
    nomination of Richard Hoagland for this diplomatic posting -
    despite his record of denying the Armenian Genocide. Hamparian
    publicly thanked Senator Robert Menendez (D-NJ), who has placed a
    "hold" on the Hoagland nomination.

    At the opening of the hearing, Chairman Richard Durbin (D-IL)
    presented a video, "Genocide and the Rule of Law" which began with
    mention of the Armenian Genocide, and went on to cite the other
    genocides of the 20th century. The film highlighted efforts by
    genocide law champion, former Sen. Bill Proxmire (D-WI), who made
    over 3,000 Senate speeches in support of U.S. ratification of the
    United Nations Convention and the Prevention and Punishment of
    Genocide. Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK), in his moving opening remarks,
    cited a poem inspired by the Armenian atrocities, but which sadly
    describes the inhumanity of all subsequent genocides.

    In his testimony, Cheadle noted Sudan as the most recent of example
    of the cycle of genocide that pervaded the last century, beginning
    with the Armenian Genocide. First term Senator Sheldon Whitehouse
    (D-RI) outlined the "pattern of genocide" the international
    community has faced over the past century, beginning with the
    Armenian Genocide.

    The text of the ANCA testimony is provided below. Remarks by the
    principal witnesses will be available on the Senate Judiciary
    Subcommittee website in the upcoming days at:
    http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearing.cfm?id=252 1

    Also submitting written testimony were Save Darfur, Armenian
    Assembly, Genocide Intervention Network, and a broad range of other
    ethnic and human rights organizations.

    #####

    Statement of Aram Hamparian
    Executive Director of the Armenian National Committee of America

    Senate Committee on the Judiciary
    Subcommittee on Human Rights and the Law
    Hearing on "Genocide and the Rule of Law"
    February 5, 2007


    Chairman Durbin, Ranking Member Coburn, and distinguished members
    of the Subcommittee, on behalf of the Armenian National Committee
    of America, I would like to thank you for holding this important
    hearing and for inviting our organization to offer the insights of
    the Armenian American community on a truly crucial issue for our
    nation and the entire international community.

    The cycle of genocide
    =====================
    Today, as we witness the genocide unfolding in Darfur, it has
    become increasingly clear that the failure of the international
    community, over the course of the past century, to confront and
    punish genocide has created an environment of impunity in which the
    brutal cycle of genocide continues.

    As Armenian Americans - heirs of a nation that bore witness to the
    20th Century's first genocide - we bear a special responsibility to
    help ensure that the lessons of our experience help prevent similar
    atrocities from being visited upon any people, anywhere in the
    world.

    We consider it our responsibility to contribute to the life-saving
    work of the Save Darfur Coalition, Africa Action, the Genocide
    Intervention Network, and other groups working to bring an end to
    the horrific suffering in Sudan. Here in the United States, we
    enthusiastically support the efforts of Facing History and
    Ourselves, the Genocide Education Project and other educational
    groups teaching America's school children about the dangers of
    genocide and the value of tolerance. We are especially encouraged
    by the powerful reach of the band "System of a Down" - comprised of
    four Armenian Americans - in educating countless millions about
    genocides - past and present. The powerful documentary
    "Screamers," which is currently playing around the nation,
    documents their work in this area. All these efforts are aimed at
    breaking the genocidal cycle.

    With specific regard to the situation in Darfur, we were gratified
    that the Administration - in a break from past practice - properly
    invoked the term genocide, but remain deeply troubled that our
    government has yet to take the decisive steps required of us under
    our commitments to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment
    of Genocide. We run the risk of turning this landmark treaty into
    a dead letter if our actions do not live up to our moral and legal
    obligations.

    As members of this panel know, the Armenian Genocide and the
    Holocaust weighed heavily on the mind of international lawyer
    Raphael Lemkin, whose family was brutally murdered by the Nazis in
    their genocidal drive to destroy the Jews of Europe. He coined the
    term "genocide" and was instrumental in the drafting and adoption
    of the Convention. In a 1949 interview with CBS, Lemkin explained,
    "I became interested in genocide because it happened to the
    Armenians; and after[wards] the Armenians got a very rough deal at
    the Versailles Conference because their criminals were guilty of
    genocide and were not punished."

    The denial of the Armenian Genocide
    ===================================

    Sadl y, even in 2007, we are faced with a state-sponsored campaign
    of denial that the Armenian Genocide ever took place.

    This denial takes the form of Turkish laws against even the mention
    of the Armenian Genocide, the systematic teaching of genocide
    denial to Turkey's school children, and, in nations around the
    world, a campaign of threats, intimidation and blackmail against
    any individual, group, or country that speaks the truth about the
    Ottoman Turkish government's murder of 1.5 million Armenians
    between 1915 and 1923.

    Our own Ambassador to the Ottoman Empire during the early years of
    the Genocide, Henry Morgenthau, described the government's crimes
    as "a campaign of race extermination." The Allied Powers vowed to
    punish the Turkish authorities for these crimes, using for the
    first time the term "crimes against humanity," but, as we know too
    well, they did not fulfill their promise of justice for the
    Armenian people, setting the stage for nearly a century of Turkish
    government denials.

    We work to end this denial because, as a matter of fundamental
    morality, our nation should recognize and condemn all genocides -
    past and present. The United States should, on principle, reject
    all genocide denial - whether it come from Tehran, Khartoum or
    Ankara. To do any less is to undermine our country's credibility
    on the most vital international issue of our time - the creation of
    a world safe from genocide.

    We work to end this denial because it seeks to obscure a proud
    chapter in American history. Those who deny this crime dishonor
    President Woodrow Wilson and all those who spoke out against the
    atrocities committed against the Armenian people. They dishonor
    the U.S. diplomats who risked their lives to document the suffering
    of the Armenian nation. They dishonor the Americans - rich and
    poor - who gave of themselves as part of an unprecedented American
    relief effort to alleviate the suffering of a brutalized
    population.

    We work to end this denial because we know that the Republic of
    Armenia cannot be safe as long as Turkey remains an unrepentant
    perpetrator of genocide against the Armenian people.

    We work to end this denial because Turkey's acceptance of a just
    resolution of the Armenian Genocide would represent significant
    progress toward a more tolerant Turkish society, and a meaningful
    step toward the Republic of Turkey's long sought acceptance into
    the European family of nations.

    And, perhaps most importantly for the work of this panel today, we
    work to end this denial because it sets a dangerous precedent - a
    real life example of genocide committed with impunity - that makes
    future genocides more likely. Prior to launching his "final
    solution," Adolf Hitler infamously cited this example in a 1939
    speech intended to quiet the potential reservations of his
    generals, asking the chilling question: "Who, after all, speaks
    today of the annihilation of the Armenians?"

    The denial of any genocide, past or present, sets a dangerous
    precedent for the future, emboldening potential perpetrators with
    the knowledge that their crimes can be committed without
    condemnation or consequence.

    The murder of Hrant Dink
    ========================

    The most recent victim of this denial is Hrant Dink, a courageous
    journalist who was assassinated on January 19th of this year in
    front of his newspaper's offices in Istanbul.

    One of the remaining Armenians living in Turkey, Hrant was born and
    spent his early years in Malatya, a city whose Armenian population
    was - with only a handful of exceptions - destroyed during the
    Armenian Genocide. As editor of Agos, a bilingual Armenian-Turkish
    language newspaper, he faced years of official persecution and
    regular death threats in response to his writings about the
    Armenian Genocide. Last year he was given a suspended sentence of
    six months under Article 301, a new provision of the Turkish Penal
    Code that punishes discussion of the Armenian Genocide as an
    "insult to Turkishness." When he criticized this verdict, he was
    prosecuted once again under a different provision of law that
    criminalizes attempts to "influence the judiciary." In his last
    column, he wrote about the torment of living in the shadow of death
    threats and the vulnerability he faced due to the government's
    incitement of hatred against him.

    Hrant Dink was not alone. Many other writers in Turkey are being
    silenced through Turkey's criminal code. Nobel Prize-winner Orhan
    Pamuk has been prosecuted under Article 301 for mentioning the
    killings of Armenians. The writer Elif Shafak was prosecuted for
    writing a novel in which her fictional characters discussed the
    Armenian Genocide.

    Hrant Dink's murder is tragic proof that the Turkish government
    continues to fuel the same type of hatred and intolerance that led
    to the Armenian Genocide more than ninety years ago. His killing
    was not an isolated act, as Turkish leaders have said in what can
    only be described as disingenuous expressions of regret, but rather
    occurred as the result of the Turkish government's official - and
    increasingly aggressive - policy of denial. His example
    underscores the pressing need for the United States to fully
    recognize the Armenian Genocide - through Executive branch action
    and the adoption by the Congress of the Armenian Genocide
    Resolution.

    U.S. complicity in Armenian Genocide denial
    ===========================================

    Sadly, the Turkish government is able to maintain its denial,
    against all evidence and the tide of international opinion, in
    large part due to the State Department's refusal to speak with
    moral clarity about the Armenian Genocide.

    Our State Department remained almost entirely unwilling to speak
    publicly against the Turkish government's longstanding prosecution
    and persecution of Hrant Dink. In fact, a search of the
    Department's website finds only one mention of him before his
    murder. In sharp contrast, the same State Department that has been
    so reluctant to defend free speech within Turkey has been more than
    willing to loudly and aggressively seek to prevent our own
    legislature - the U.S. Congress - from even considering legislation
    commemorating Armenian Genocide.

    In a truly unfortunate escalation of our complicity in Turkey's
    denials, the State Department, last year, fired Ambassador John
    Evans - a distinguished diplomat with over thirty years of
    experience - for properly characterizing the Armenian Genocide. In
    the proud tradition of Ambassador Henry Morgenthau, who represented
    our nation in the Ottoman Empire during the early years of the
    Genocide, Ambassador Evans spoke the truth about this crime against
    humanity. For this, his career of service to our nation was ended
    by an Administration apparently more concerned with the
    sensitivities of a foreign government - one that regularly violates
    the free speech rights of its own citizens - than with the rights
    of an American citizen who speaks out honestly about genocide. The
    Turkish government's Foreign Agent Registration Filings with the
    Justice Department reveal that its foreign agents contacted several
    U.S. officials regarding the Ambassador's comments, but, as of
    today, the State Department has been unwilling to offer any
    meaningful explanation of the role the Turkish government played in
    the Ambassador's dismissal.

    Most recently, the President - in the face of broad-based
    Congressional opposition - has again nominated Richard Hoagland to
    serve as ambassador to Armenia, despite his intensely controversial
    record of denying the Genocide. As a community, Armenian Americans
    are deeply grateful for the principled leadership of Senator Robert
    Menendez, who has, once again, placed a hold on this ill-advised
    nomination.

    In closing, I would like to stress that, although the Armenian
    Genocide began in 1915, it continues today through the Turkish
    government's worldwide campaign of denial. We look to the members
    of this panel, and to all Members of Congress, to help end U.S.
    complicity in Turkey's denial, and to encourage the Republic of
    Turkey to abandon its efforts to erase this chapter in its - and
    the world's - history.

    The proper recognition and universal commemoration of the Armenian
    Genocide will, we are confident, represent a meaningful
    contribution to our nation's efforts to end the cycle of genocide.


    ______________________________________ _____________________________
Working...
X