Tweet
Kurdish Media, UK
Feb 2 2007
Survival of the filthiest
2/2/2007 KurdishMedia.com - By Dr Fereydun Hilmi
The New Theory concerning survival which could truly be called
Bushism is cantered around entirely new principles nothing to do with
logic evolution or biology. It is to do with the abuse of power and
the exploitation of the simple voter in the western world. We know
Russia and China have never sampled democracy and so they fall in
line with this theory quite easily.
In 1932 when Hitler was elected to the Reichstag it was the voters
who had suffered great humiliation and oppression causing great
deprivation, poverty and even starvation who elected him in what they
say was free and fair elections. He went on to take absolute power
and participated in a great war causing the death of over thirty
million people and the invention of concentration camps and the most
inhuman methods of inflicting pain and bodily harm since the reign of
Hulago Khan; the Grandson of Genghis khan in the 13th century. When
he invaded Baghdad Hulago set about destroying Baghdad's
infrastructure. He destroyed every living thing in the city which
became derelict and abandoned while the territory became under the
control of the Mongols at Tabriz - present Iran.
Recently we have heard the stories about the torture methods
practiced in Iraqi and American prisons in Iraq and many have
wondered where the Iraqis got the method of gouging prisoners' eyes.
I came across the text of a speech by Saddam translated to English
and published by the Guardian on January 17, 2003, part of which I
quote below:
`But Baghdad was not in a position to defend itself properly, and
therefore the eyes of Hulago's army were not gouged out on its walls
nor was it extinguished in its face the venture of trespassing it, or
even to deny it the chance of going ahead to others from the nation
to attack them as it attacked Baghdad, till Hulago's eyes were gouged
out at the hands of the Mameluke dynasty in Egypt at the famous
battle of (Ain Jalut)/
Are we then seeing the revenge of Hulago's descendents today? Is
Sulago the real name of the perpetrator of the crimes so similar to
those committed by the great evil-doer of old which we saw belatedly
on Channel 4? Or is Channel 4 simply carrying on with its policy of
fielding extra-ordinary and awful programmes thus adding violence to
sex and other risky materials to compte with its sister Channel 5?
In that speech Saddam points to the role of the Zionists and New-Cons
in bringing about the forthcoming Hulago-style invasion of Iraq. A
couple of days ago I attended a solidarity meeting with the Armenians
still living in Turkey. The main Armenian speaker gave a very
detailed speech covering the crime of the murder of the Writer Hrant
Dink and went onto explaining some of the causes of Genocide which he
said the mealy-mouthed western politicians refuse to describe the
Armenian massacres as. It does not matter what you call it said the
learned Professor Pilkinina, himself an Armenian Historian. Call it
mass killing, massacre, genocide, holocaust for I do not care - It
happened and it was a great crime which must be admitted and
recognised as such to prevent it happening again.
Then he said that such act are mainly racial and to do with Darwinism
adding that the title of the Theory is often misquoted as only the
Theory of Evolution rather than The Theory of Evolution or The
Survival of the Fittest. Today we have western leaders committing the
same sort of Genocidal acts under the pretext of divine inspiration,
fighting terrorism, and several such excuses. They believe that they
have succeeded to the extent that they rule by God's will and no
longer need to refer back to the Parliaments and the people who were
duped into electing them. Recently Tony Blair the still single-handed
ruler of Great Britain advocated Warmongering by claiming that we
need to keep wars going around the world to keep our forces in a
state of readiness to defend the Empire - a real version of `The
Empire Strikes Back' and forwards.
I have on many occasions pointed out the Nasti methods deployed by
Bush and his little boy demonstrating the closeness of their
ideology, reasoning and methods with those of Hitler such as:
Divineness, Intensive propaganda and the propagation of lies and
deception, the foundation and use of concentration camps with all the
torture, interrogation and elimination methods - and now Channel 4
shows us the refinements of gouging eyes and drilling skulls of live
people - in their prisons and those which they helped the primitive
savages they have installed in the Green Zoo as well as in those
secret - welkl talked about - prisons in the civilised western world.
The interesting thing now is the behaviour of the 2007 world dictator
who has not only deceived and defied the entire world but is now
attempting to defy his own nation and their democratic constitution,
Congress and Senate.
In effect he has usurped all power for eight and become a dictator
just as Hitler dis with one important difference - Hitler had the
support of the vast majority of his nation right up to the last
moment while Bush has himself is reported to have said that he will
go on even if only his wife and his dog remained in his support. It
was not clear if he meant his domestic or the most well-known of his
international lapdogs.
Here I must return to my earlier warnings. I do not dislike any
nation or individual with a modicum of humanity and fairness can
agree to what is going in Iraq and around the world. I despise all
who want to introduce their Machiavellian-Freudian principles as the
new religion for all to follow and accept as their imposed way of
life. Why should Dubai and Qatar and Mecca for example be cheap
copies of London and New York? Why should all nations abandon their
long and old traditions developed over centuries and thousand of
years in favour of the Koka-Kola MakDonald Society? Why do buildings
in the middle of the desert be built in the same way as those in
Western Europe and the USA? And why should people of the desert
abandon their highly suitable way of life and adopt one suited to
colder climates and different cultures?
I despise all who wish to force any ideas down anyone's throat - good
or bad - for liberty, freedom and fairness are the most sacred
principles as far as I am concerned. The new religion based on lies
and deception and the use of basic instincts to control peoples
behaviour and actions is not only against the good basic principles
of the three main religions - the result of thousands of years of
experiences and analyses which helped us arrive at the current day
but against all the interests of western before eastern societies.
Western societies are the more enlightened and advanced if the two
and the evil being spread around the world would boomeranging back to
his them and they should therefore reject all attempts to Globalise
those principles in the name of democracy and progress.
Extremism is the act of going to extremes and is not something which
would be tolerated always. Man was born absolutely free and went on
being so for thousands if not hundreds of years. Thus liberalism is a
natural tendency and a good one. However over the century's man
started living in societies and the interests of these societies
became gradually more important. Rules and codes of conduct started
being laid down. Religions started being coined - the last three of
which claim divinity. There are plenty of good principles in these
religions and the competition should be about which of them offers
the best and more useful and progressive methods and principles;
weeding out the bad ones and abandoning the useless.
Religion however proved to be too restrictive for scientific
advancement and caused people to rethink about ways of avoiding
conflict while not trashing or abandoning the good principles which
help and have helped the creation of law-abiding and humane
societies. As for man's basic instincts of sex greed love, hate,
revenge, jealousy religion has the better solutions than the new
liberalism and permissiveness. Self control and the avoidance of
sexual practices such is today being advanced by the so called
liberals is harmful from the point of view of individual health and
well-being as well as from the point of view of the society. Thus
relinquishing all controls and following a completely liberal
attitude will return us back to year zero and ultimately destroy
civilisation.
To be convinced of this one can see the diseases and malformed
children born to promiscuous people, the spread of AIDS and sexual
diseases and cancers. From the society's point of you liberalism has
led to the break-up of the family destruction of the parent-child
bonds and relationships, the degradation of manners among children
and the young and the attempts of everything weird or unusual for the
sake of experimentation, an increase in child abuse, incest, the
seeking of same-sex relationships and last but not least crimes and
anti-social behaviour connected with all of these practices.
Murders of previously unknown qualities such as associated with White
Cannibalism, racial hatred, record cases of rapes and muggings and so
on as well as crimes which have clearly resulted from the charging of
British and US soldiers emotionally and with the induction of drugs
and psychological warfare is now returning to Britain and the US. A
few days ago we learnt of the soldier who had fought oin Iraq and
Kosovo killing in cold blood four of his family and giving himself up
because he no longer could control his actions.
This situation which could be compared with the notion of
`Constructive Chaos' of the lady at the top of Bush's diplomacy
machine and will produce similar results. The dog-eat-dog society we
live in today cannot last. Soon all the best brains will cease to
produce for the good of mankind and will become servants of the
rulers just as they were in olden times. Already you find that even
if you were the greatest genius on the planet you will only be
allowed to function if you toe the line. The US and Britain are
covertly following this policy at home but quite overtly practicing
it in their New Colonies as well as their existing client-states.
Mankind is therefore in more danger than it is ready to consider. In
the overseas Blair and Bush may count on their command of huge armies
and navies to control the situation but they do not have these
luxuries at home. Chaotic Liberalism will burn the wet and the dry
and fighting Communism is quite different from fighting Religious
Beliefs because these beliefs are at the very soul of human beings
and without them people would be spiritually lost. Science and
technology however advanced they may today have not yet reached a
tiny percentage of what is needed to explain the workings of the
world. Until it is people want the comfort of belief systems which at
least show them ways of life capable of making them sleep well at
night for not all can be satisfied with logic and scientific
reasoning even if they could use those techniques.
The West should learn the lesson of Communism which seemed to offer
ideas for solving the injustices of the economic relations between
Capitalists and Workers nevertheless tries to dehumanise life and
offer half-baked philosophies and quite a bit of `liberalism' in
place of what calms the human heart and produces spiritual
tranquillity. They too depended on Freud and Machiavelli and look
what happened to them.
http://www.kurdmedia.com/news.asp?id=13987
Feb 2 2007
Survival of the filthiest
2/2/2007 KurdishMedia.com - By Dr Fereydun Hilmi
The New Theory concerning survival which could truly be called
Bushism is cantered around entirely new principles nothing to do with
logic evolution or biology. It is to do with the abuse of power and
the exploitation of the simple voter in the western world. We know
Russia and China have never sampled democracy and so they fall in
line with this theory quite easily.
In 1932 when Hitler was elected to the Reichstag it was the voters
who had suffered great humiliation and oppression causing great
deprivation, poverty and even starvation who elected him in what they
say was free and fair elections. He went on to take absolute power
and participated in a great war causing the death of over thirty
million people and the invention of concentration camps and the most
inhuman methods of inflicting pain and bodily harm since the reign of
Hulago Khan; the Grandson of Genghis khan in the 13th century. When
he invaded Baghdad Hulago set about destroying Baghdad's
infrastructure. He destroyed every living thing in the city which
became derelict and abandoned while the territory became under the
control of the Mongols at Tabriz - present Iran.
Recently we have heard the stories about the torture methods
practiced in Iraqi and American prisons in Iraq and many have
wondered where the Iraqis got the method of gouging prisoners' eyes.
I came across the text of a speech by Saddam translated to English
and published by the Guardian on January 17, 2003, part of which I
quote below:
`But Baghdad was not in a position to defend itself properly, and
therefore the eyes of Hulago's army were not gouged out on its walls
nor was it extinguished in its face the venture of trespassing it, or
even to deny it the chance of going ahead to others from the nation
to attack them as it attacked Baghdad, till Hulago's eyes were gouged
out at the hands of the Mameluke dynasty in Egypt at the famous
battle of (Ain Jalut)/
Are we then seeing the revenge of Hulago's descendents today? Is
Sulago the real name of the perpetrator of the crimes so similar to
those committed by the great evil-doer of old which we saw belatedly
on Channel 4? Or is Channel 4 simply carrying on with its policy of
fielding extra-ordinary and awful programmes thus adding violence to
sex and other risky materials to compte with its sister Channel 5?
In that speech Saddam points to the role of the Zionists and New-Cons
in bringing about the forthcoming Hulago-style invasion of Iraq. A
couple of days ago I attended a solidarity meeting with the Armenians
still living in Turkey. The main Armenian speaker gave a very
detailed speech covering the crime of the murder of the Writer Hrant
Dink and went onto explaining some of the causes of Genocide which he
said the mealy-mouthed western politicians refuse to describe the
Armenian massacres as. It does not matter what you call it said the
learned Professor Pilkinina, himself an Armenian Historian. Call it
mass killing, massacre, genocide, holocaust for I do not care - It
happened and it was a great crime which must be admitted and
recognised as such to prevent it happening again.
Then he said that such act are mainly racial and to do with Darwinism
adding that the title of the Theory is often misquoted as only the
Theory of Evolution rather than The Theory of Evolution or The
Survival of the Fittest. Today we have western leaders committing the
same sort of Genocidal acts under the pretext of divine inspiration,
fighting terrorism, and several such excuses. They believe that they
have succeeded to the extent that they rule by God's will and no
longer need to refer back to the Parliaments and the people who were
duped into electing them. Recently Tony Blair the still single-handed
ruler of Great Britain advocated Warmongering by claiming that we
need to keep wars going around the world to keep our forces in a
state of readiness to defend the Empire - a real version of `The
Empire Strikes Back' and forwards.
I have on many occasions pointed out the Nasti methods deployed by
Bush and his little boy demonstrating the closeness of their
ideology, reasoning and methods with those of Hitler such as:
Divineness, Intensive propaganda and the propagation of lies and
deception, the foundation and use of concentration camps with all the
torture, interrogation and elimination methods - and now Channel 4
shows us the refinements of gouging eyes and drilling skulls of live
people - in their prisons and those which they helped the primitive
savages they have installed in the Green Zoo as well as in those
secret - welkl talked about - prisons in the civilised western world.
The interesting thing now is the behaviour of the 2007 world dictator
who has not only deceived and defied the entire world but is now
attempting to defy his own nation and their democratic constitution,
Congress and Senate.
In effect he has usurped all power for eight and become a dictator
just as Hitler dis with one important difference - Hitler had the
support of the vast majority of his nation right up to the last
moment while Bush has himself is reported to have said that he will
go on even if only his wife and his dog remained in his support. It
was not clear if he meant his domestic or the most well-known of his
international lapdogs.
Here I must return to my earlier warnings. I do not dislike any
nation or individual with a modicum of humanity and fairness can
agree to what is going in Iraq and around the world. I despise all
who want to introduce their Machiavellian-Freudian principles as the
new religion for all to follow and accept as their imposed way of
life. Why should Dubai and Qatar and Mecca for example be cheap
copies of London and New York? Why should all nations abandon their
long and old traditions developed over centuries and thousand of
years in favour of the Koka-Kola MakDonald Society? Why do buildings
in the middle of the desert be built in the same way as those in
Western Europe and the USA? And why should people of the desert
abandon their highly suitable way of life and adopt one suited to
colder climates and different cultures?
I despise all who wish to force any ideas down anyone's throat - good
or bad - for liberty, freedom and fairness are the most sacred
principles as far as I am concerned. The new religion based on lies
and deception and the use of basic instincts to control peoples
behaviour and actions is not only against the good basic principles
of the three main religions - the result of thousands of years of
experiences and analyses which helped us arrive at the current day
but against all the interests of western before eastern societies.
Western societies are the more enlightened and advanced if the two
and the evil being spread around the world would boomeranging back to
his them and they should therefore reject all attempts to Globalise
those principles in the name of democracy and progress.
Extremism is the act of going to extremes and is not something which
would be tolerated always. Man was born absolutely free and went on
being so for thousands if not hundreds of years. Thus liberalism is a
natural tendency and a good one. However over the century's man
started living in societies and the interests of these societies
became gradually more important. Rules and codes of conduct started
being laid down. Religions started being coined - the last three of
which claim divinity. There are plenty of good principles in these
religions and the competition should be about which of them offers
the best and more useful and progressive methods and principles;
weeding out the bad ones and abandoning the useless.
Religion however proved to be too restrictive for scientific
advancement and caused people to rethink about ways of avoiding
conflict while not trashing or abandoning the good principles which
help and have helped the creation of law-abiding and humane
societies. As for man's basic instincts of sex greed love, hate,
revenge, jealousy religion has the better solutions than the new
liberalism and permissiveness. Self control and the avoidance of
sexual practices such is today being advanced by the so called
liberals is harmful from the point of view of individual health and
well-being as well as from the point of view of the society. Thus
relinquishing all controls and following a completely liberal
attitude will return us back to year zero and ultimately destroy
civilisation.
To be convinced of this one can see the diseases and malformed
children born to promiscuous people, the spread of AIDS and sexual
diseases and cancers. From the society's point of you liberalism has
led to the break-up of the family destruction of the parent-child
bonds and relationships, the degradation of manners among children
and the young and the attempts of everything weird or unusual for the
sake of experimentation, an increase in child abuse, incest, the
seeking of same-sex relationships and last but not least crimes and
anti-social behaviour connected with all of these practices.
Murders of previously unknown qualities such as associated with White
Cannibalism, racial hatred, record cases of rapes and muggings and so
on as well as crimes which have clearly resulted from the charging of
British and US soldiers emotionally and with the induction of drugs
and psychological warfare is now returning to Britain and the US. A
few days ago we learnt of the soldier who had fought oin Iraq and
Kosovo killing in cold blood four of his family and giving himself up
because he no longer could control his actions.
This situation which could be compared with the notion of
`Constructive Chaos' of the lady at the top of Bush's diplomacy
machine and will produce similar results. The dog-eat-dog society we
live in today cannot last. Soon all the best brains will cease to
produce for the good of mankind and will become servants of the
rulers just as they were in olden times. Already you find that even
if you were the greatest genius on the planet you will only be
allowed to function if you toe the line. The US and Britain are
covertly following this policy at home but quite overtly practicing
it in their New Colonies as well as their existing client-states.
Mankind is therefore in more danger than it is ready to consider. In
the overseas Blair and Bush may count on their command of huge armies
and navies to control the situation but they do not have these
luxuries at home. Chaotic Liberalism will burn the wet and the dry
and fighting Communism is quite different from fighting Religious
Beliefs because these beliefs are at the very soul of human beings
and without them people would be spiritually lost. Science and
technology however advanced they may today have not yet reached a
tiny percentage of what is needed to explain the workings of the
world. Until it is people want the comfort of belief systems which at
least show them ways of life capable of making them sleep well at
night for not all can be satisfied with logic and scientific
reasoning even if they could use those techniques.
The West should learn the lesson of Communism which seemed to offer
ideas for solving the injustices of the economic relations between
Capitalists and Workers nevertheless tries to dehumanise life and
offer half-baked philosophies and quite a bit of `liberalism' in
place of what calms the human heart and produces spiritual
tranquillity. They too depended on Freud and Machiavelli and look
what happened to them.
http://www.kurdmedia.com/news.asp?id=13987