Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Europe's Intellectual Dhimmitude

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Europe's Intellectual Dhimmitude

    The Jerusalem Report
    February 19, 2007

    EUROPE'S INTELLECTUAL DHIMMITUDE

    by Carine Cassuto


    "Who's afraid of Islam?" could have been the defining motto of the
    recent parliamentary elections in the Nether-lands. With the murders
    of outspoken anti-Muslim critics - politician Pim Fortuyn in 2002 and
    film director Theo van Gogh in 2004 - barely digested, the body
    politic chose to ignore the thorny question of integration of the
    Muslim minority and, instead, to focus on less contentious issues,
    such as health care and pensions.

    That is until a little-known Dutch-Armenian lobby group stirred up a
    hornet's nest. FAON, the Federation of Armenian Organizations in the
    Netherlands, made it known it would protest the candidacy of three
    politicians of Turkish descent who had, in a Turkish-language daily,
    denied the Armenian genocide.

    The three politicians - one Christian Democrat and two Social
    Democrats - were dropped like hot potatoes by their respective
    parties, which in turn prompted the Turkish community to threaten to
    boycott the elections. This soon had leaders of the main parties
    bending over backwards to appease their Turkish and other Muslim
    constituents.

    The brouhaha over the Armenian genocide - or "unpleasantness" as some
    Turks would have it - is not just indicative of the Netherlands'
    inability to deal with its so-called multi-cultural society. It is
    symptomatic of Europe's kowtowing to the political and intellectual
    dictates of its fast-growing - mainly Muslim - minorities. Around
    Europe vocal protest by Muslims appears to leave their host societies
    dazed and confused. Whether it is art that is intended to provoke,
    such as the Danish cartoons of Muhammad, or fears that the proposed
    staging of Mozart's opera Idomeneo in Berlin might offend Muslim
    sensitivities, more often than not it leads to an all too familiar
    dance: Muslim outrage and an overabundance of caution on the side of
    the authorities.

    It is this chastened subservience that has led some scholars to issue
    a stern warning: Europe is rapidly becoming "Eurabia," a continent
    that is slowly falling under the sway of Islam. Demographically,
    because of the relatively high birth rate among the Muslim
    communities, and politically: Time after time, they argue, European
    countries give in to 'demands' by outraged Muslims, thus behaving
    like dhimmis, the official inferior status accorded to Jews and
    Christians under Islamic shari'a law.

    The sustained Muslim pressure is having a baneful influence on
    European intellectual life. Two recent Dutch examples drive the point
    home. After almost 40 years of lecturing at Utrecht University and
    with his eyesight failing, Jewish history professor Piet van der
    Horst was looking forward to delivering his retirement lecture last
    summer. Van der Horst wanted to trace the myth of Jewish cannibalism
    from the Hellenistic period through the Middle Ages to the Nazi-era.
    He also decided to add a timely twist to his farewell lecture: the
    resurfacing of the myth of Jewish cannibalism in contemporary Islamic
    society. And he wanted to conclude by saying: "The Islamic world has
    taken up the cause of senseless Jew-hatred from the Nazis and is
    doing so with great gusto. The Islamization of European anti-Semitism
    is one of the most horrifying developments of the last decades."

    However, Van der Horst never got to deliver his lecture in that form.
    University Dean Willem Hendrik Gispen told him that it was
    academically substandard and would, if delivered, create an immediate
    security risk. Van der Horst delivered a sanitized version of the
    lecture.

    One of the most telling examples of this modern-day intellectual
    dhimmitude is the changed curriculum for Shoah education in some
    Dutch vocational schools, introduced after reports that history
    teachers found it impossible to address the subject in classes
    comprised largely of pupils of Moroccan descent. In some cases, more
    than half of the students would leave the classroom, threatening
    phone calls were made and car tires were punctured. "More and more,
    we hear from teachers that they are confronted with anti-Semitism
    from their pupils when they teach the Second World War and the
    persecution of the Jews. The fallout of 9/11 and the war between
    Israel and the Palestinians are disrupting influences when it comes
    to teaching the Holocaust," the Amsterdam-based Anne Frank Foundation
    noted.

    Enter Diversion, a "creative project agency" hired by the City of
    Amsterdam to create a curriculum that would be more palatable to the
    students. With the aim of teaching the students "what the
    con-sequences of discrimination and anti-Semitism would be in today's
    Amsterdam," Diversion put together a textbook consisting of three
    chapters on WWII and another three on the Israeli-Palestinian
    conflict.

    According to Diversion, the initial test-run was successful with
    anti-Semitism down by one-third among students who had taken the
    pilot course. Not surprising, considering the fact that anti-Semitism
    has been redefined as "racism against Semitic people such as Jews and
    Arabs." Or that concentration camps are now places where people "were
    held prisoner" and had to undertake "heavy labor."

    What all this might mean for future European positions on Israel and
    the Middle East is truly alarming.

    Carine Cassuto is an Amsterdam-based journalist and a former
    editor-in-chief of the Dutch Jewish Weekly.
Working...
X