Tweet
IPI Deplores Callous Murder of Journalist in Istanbul
International Press Institute (press release), Austria
Jan 22 2007
22 January 2007
On Friday, 19 January, the Turkish-Armenian journalist, Hrant Dink,
was murdered outside the offices of the newspaper he founded.
The journalist, who worked for the weekly newspaper Agos, was
apparently shot twice in the head and once in the neck.
Dink was a popular journalist who has faced legal problems for his
articles about the massacre of Armenians during the First World War.
These comments have frequently tested harsh Turkish restrictions on
discussing this topic, which prohibit "insulting Turkishness." In July,
Dink lost an appeal over a suspended six-month prison sentence handed
down for an article discussing the massacre.
Aside from this criminal case, Dink was also facing prosecution for a
second article condemning his conviction. Turkish prosecutors believe
it was an attempt to influence the administration of justice.
The reason for the Turkish government's desire to prosecute journalists
and writers who discuss the Armenian massacre is related to the
terminology used. Since the event occurred, the Turkish government
has refused to accept the term "genocide," while a number of other
countries have recognised the term in relation to the incident.
On 20 January, Turkish police arrested a young man suspected of
carrying out the murder. According to newspaper reports, he is believed
to belong to the youth wing of a right-wing nationalist party.
Commenting on the murder, IPI Director Johann P. Fritz, said, "This
is a terrible event for Turkish press freedom. It sends the inevitable
signal to all Turkish media that, if you discuss the Armenian massacre
in the same terms as Dink, you face not only constant harassment from
the authorities, but the possibility of assassination."
"In order for Turkey to take its rightful place among other democratic
nations, it must do away with all laws that inhibit discussion and
dialogue about the massacre of Armenians during the First World War."
"While the investigation has yet to be carried out, it seems probable
to me that the continued existence of the dated notion of 'Turkishness'
encourages others to take the law into their own hands and commit
violence."
"I think the time has now come for the government to realise that
such laws have no place in a modern society. I would also hope that,
following Dink's murder, there is an open discussion about these
issues leading to an agreement by all sides to consign such laws to
Turkish history," Fritz added.
International Press Institute (press release), Austria
Jan 22 2007
22 January 2007
On Friday, 19 January, the Turkish-Armenian journalist, Hrant Dink,
was murdered outside the offices of the newspaper he founded.
The journalist, who worked for the weekly newspaper Agos, was
apparently shot twice in the head and once in the neck.
Dink was a popular journalist who has faced legal problems for his
articles about the massacre of Armenians during the First World War.
These comments have frequently tested harsh Turkish restrictions on
discussing this topic, which prohibit "insulting Turkishness." In July,
Dink lost an appeal over a suspended six-month prison sentence handed
down for an article discussing the massacre.
Aside from this criminal case, Dink was also facing prosecution for a
second article condemning his conviction. Turkish prosecutors believe
it was an attempt to influence the administration of justice.
The reason for the Turkish government's desire to prosecute journalists
and writers who discuss the Armenian massacre is related to the
terminology used. Since the event occurred, the Turkish government
has refused to accept the term "genocide," while a number of other
countries have recognised the term in relation to the incident.
On 20 January, Turkish police arrested a young man suspected of
carrying out the murder. According to newspaper reports, he is believed
to belong to the youth wing of a right-wing nationalist party.
Commenting on the murder, IPI Director Johann P. Fritz, said, "This
is a terrible event for Turkish press freedom. It sends the inevitable
signal to all Turkish media that, if you discuss the Armenian massacre
in the same terms as Dink, you face not only constant harassment from
the authorities, but the possibility of assassination."
"In order for Turkey to take its rightful place among other democratic
nations, it must do away with all laws that inhibit discussion and
dialogue about the massacre of Armenians during the First World War."
"While the investigation has yet to be carried out, it seems probable
to me that the continued existence of the dated notion of 'Turkishness'
encourages others to take the law into their own hands and commit
violence."
"I think the time has now come for the government to realise that
such laws have no place in a modern society. I would also hope that,
following Dink's murder, there is an open discussion about these
issues leading to an agreement by all sides to consign such laws to
Turkish history," Fritz added.