Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Belief in an ideal cost an editor his life

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Belief in an ideal cost an editor his life

    Palm Beach Post Editorial
    Belief in an ideal cost an editor his life
    Sunday, January 28, 2007
    BY DOUGLAS KALAJIAN

    http://www.palmbeachpost.com/opinion/content/opi nion/epaper/2007/01/28/a1e_kalajian_commentary_012 8.html

    Hrant Dink died last week because he would not let go of a crazy idea.

    He believed in the essential decency of his fellow human beings.

    As editor of the last Armenian-language newspaper in Istanbul,
    Mr. Dink pleaded with his country to face its ugliest history by
    taking responsibility for the mass slaughter of Turkey's Armenian
    minority in the years before, during and after the First World
    War. This took remarkable courage.

    Turkey not only disavows any such responsibility, it forbids the mere
    suggestion that Armenians were subjected to genocide. Respected
    Turkish author Orhan Pamuk experienced the consequences two years ago
    after he acknowledged the Armenian Genocide: He was charged with the
    crime of "insulting Turkishness."

    Mr. Pamuk's case led to an international outcry. The charges were
    dropped, but the government continued to press similar charges against
    a number of lesser-known academics and writers, including Hrant Dink.

    To Armenians in diaspora, the prosecution of Mr. Dink echoed the
    persecution of their parents and grandparents. My father survived The
    Genocide as a child, but at a terrible price. He grew up without a
    family, a home or a country.

    Despite that, he remained remarkably free of bitterness or anger
    toward Turkey and its people.

    He found it almost impossible to speak about what he experienced, but
    he insisted that I learn enough history to appreciate its lessons. He
    believed, as Mr. Dink apparently did, that truth does more good than
    harm.

    The truth about the Armenian Genocide always has been
    clear. Massacres, forced marches and mass starvation of deportees were
    reported in numbing detail in The New York Times and other major
    publications. A typical headline from Aug. 18, 1915:
    "ARMENIANS ARE SENT
    TO PERISH IN DESERT"
    The story reported "a plan to exterminate the whole Armenian people."
    It hardly was the world's first or the last scheme of mass
    extermination. Raphael Lemkin, a Polish-born Holocaust survivor,
    surveyed not just the wreckage of postwar Europe but the wreckage of
    history when he drew a common thread through the destruction of
    Carthage and the mass murders of Armenians and Jews. He gave the world
    its first word for barbarity on such horrific scale: genocide.

    Turkey insists that the virtual disappearance of its once-vast
    Armenian population was a consequence of war and not an act of ethnic
    cleansing, but the artifice has become increasingly difficult to
    sustain. Armenians have lobbied to make acknowledgment of the Genocide
    a condition of Turkey's entry into the European Union, a demand that
    has infuriated the Turkish government.

    Until last week, however, there was at least one powerful voice of
    dissent in the Armenian community: Hrant Dink's.

    Mr. Dink was that rare creature - a man of principle. He did not think
    Turkey should be wrestled into submission. He seemed to believe that
    truth would triumph by its own virtue. He also believed in the country
    of his birth, Turkey. Friends encouraged him to flee rather than face
    charges, but Mr. Dink refused, even as taunts and death threats
    mounted.

    "I persevered through all this with patience awaiting the decision
    that would acquit me," he wrote in his last column for his newspaper,
    Agos. "Then the truth would prevail and all those people would be
    ashamed of what they had done."

    The column was published on Jan. 19. Mr. Dink was shot three times in
    the head soon after leaving his office that day. Authorities have
    charged a 17-year-old with pulling the trigger on orders of an
    ultra-nationalist group. The government that bullied Mr. Dink and
    sullied his reputation condemned the murder and hailed him as a
    champion of free expression.

    Hrant Dink was tragically wrong in believing that he would find
    justice, but he also was right. The night he died, thousands of Turks
    streamed into the streets of Istanbul to demonstrate that good people
    never are insulted by the truth of history.

    "We are all Armenians," the crowd chanted. "We are all Hrant Dink."
Working...
X