Tweet
A1+
WHO DO THE FINGERPRINTS BELONG TO?
[05:05 pm] 04 July, 2007
On July 4, Levon Gulyan's advocate Hrayr Ghukasyan presented the
conclusions of local and international experts. There are differences
in the description of injuries, the advocate said.
To remind, according to official sources, Levon Gulyan was invited to
an interrogation. His attempts to flee were doomed to failure as he
fell down from the second floor.
The local experts hardly touched upon the question. They ignored the
injuries in the right part of the body, and the bruises on Gulyan's
shoulders and jaw. The experts didn't answer a most important
question, whether there were bodily injuries on the body inflicted
before the fall. According to international experts some bodily
injuries might have been caused before the fall, noted Hrayr
Ghukasyan.
Another serious argument is that Gulyan's body didn't s hit the pipe
sideways, as it was presented in the preliminary conclusion, but on
the back. According to Hrayr Ghukasyan this fact can be deemed as
starting point. `The international experts expressed readiness to
review the case,' Ghukasyan noted.
The advocate is concerned over a few issues. Gulyan's relatives don't
have international experts' official conclusion. They got acquainted
with the electronic version.
A number of issues still remain mysterious. During the dactyloscopic
examination the fingerprints found on the window of Investigator
Tadevosyan's office, proved to belong neither to Tadevosyan, nor to
his deputy Mgoyan. This gives ground for serious contemplations.
WHO DO THE FINGERPRINTS BELONG TO?
[05:05 pm] 04 July, 2007
On July 4, Levon Gulyan's advocate Hrayr Ghukasyan presented the
conclusions of local and international experts. There are differences
in the description of injuries, the advocate said.
To remind, according to official sources, Levon Gulyan was invited to
an interrogation. His attempts to flee were doomed to failure as he
fell down from the second floor.
The local experts hardly touched upon the question. They ignored the
injuries in the right part of the body, and the bruises on Gulyan's
shoulders and jaw. The experts didn't answer a most important
question, whether there were bodily injuries on the body inflicted
before the fall. According to international experts some bodily
injuries might have been caused before the fall, noted Hrayr
Ghukasyan.
Another serious argument is that Gulyan's body didn't s hit the pipe
sideways, as it was presented in the preliminary conclusion, but on
the back. According to Hrayr Ghukasyan this fact can be deemed as
starting point. `The international experts expressed readiness to
review the case,' Ghukasyan noted.
The advocate is concerned over a few issues. Gulyan's relatives don't
have international experts' official conclusion. They got acquainted
with the electronic version.
A number of issues still remain mysterious. During the dactyloscopic
examination the fingerprints found on the window of Investigator
Tadevosyan's office, proved to belong neither to Tadevosyan, nor to
his deputy Mgoyan. This gives ground for serious contemplations.