Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why Putin Pulled out of a Key Treaty

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Why Putin Pulled out of a Key Treaty

    Saturday, Jul. 14, 2007
    Why Putin Pulled out of a Key Treaty
    By Yuri Zarakhovich

    _time.com_ (http://www.time.com)

    Far be it from anyone to cast a shadow over the famous Maine
    lobster. But even this fabled treat failed to work as a sweetener on
    Russian President Vladimir Putin. On the way to Kennebunkport, where
    President George W. Bush's family were receiving "friend Vladimir"
    earlier his month, Putin had been particularly fretting about the
    prospective deployment in Europe of the U.S.

    Anti-Ballistic Missile system (ABM), a shield against missiles that
    rogue countries, Iran in particular, may be able to launch in
    future. In addition to ABM, which Putin considers a threat to Russia,
    NATO failed to ratify the Conventional Forces in Europe Treaty (CFE) -
    a key European arms control treaty that has been regulating the
    deployment of troops and the monitoring of weapons systems on the
    continent since 1990. Still, the Kennebunkport was full of good cheer,
    great fishing and conciliatory hints that these newly risen
    U.S.-Russian tensions would soon ease up.

    Nevertheless, six pounds of choice Maine lobster and two weekends
    later, Putin delivered on a long-promised threat. Early Saturday
    morning, the Kremlin abruptly announced Putin's decree to halt
    Russia's participation in the CFE treaty due to "extraordinary
    circumstances ... which affect the security ofthe Russian Federation
    and require immediate measures."

    Putin's "extraordinary circumstances" are clear: first, he says
    missile shield in Europe will see through entire Russia's defenses all
    the way to the Urals; Russia seeks to counter that, but the treaty
    stands very much in theway.

    Second, NATO countries have failed to ratify the treaty's 1999 amended
    version - a failure that Putin insists upsets the balance of forces in
    Europe. For their part, NATO countries hold that the amended version
    required that Moscow withdraw troops from Moldova and Georgia, which
    it hasn't completed, and refuse to ratify until Russia fully complies.

    Within hours of the Kremlin's announcement, the Russian Foreign
    Ministry said that Russia will halt inspections and verifications of
    its military sites by NATO countries and will no longer limit the
    number of its conventional weapons. Russia, however, had already
    halted such verification visits after a CFE treaty conference held in
    Vienna last month turned a deaf ear to Russia's complaints; military
    delegations from Bulgaria and Hungary had been deniedentry to Russian
    military units. Also last month, Russia turned down an invitation to
    take part in joint exercises with the U.S., Romania and
    Bulgaria. General Vladimir Shamanov, particularly notorious for
    aggressive tactics in Chechnya and now advisor to the Russian Defense
    Minister, said: "The Soviet Army took part in joint exercises with the
    Nazi Germany. Which resulted in Germany's perfidiously attacking the
    USSR. What trust there can be now, if the US is deploying bases in
    Romania and Bulgaria?"

    There is wide speculation that Putin's idea of "immediate measures"
    will be to build up its forces in border areas now that it is free of
    the CFE treaty.

    Last month, First Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov, who
    increasingly positions himself as Putin's hawkish potential successor,
    said that Russia would deploy its newly tested Iskander-M cruise
    missiles in is westernmost Kaliningradsky region, wedged among Poland,
    Lithuania and Belarus, unless the U.S. scrapes its defense shield
    bases in Poland and the Czech Republic. Ivanov's threats only
    infuriated Poland and made Lithuania consider asking the U.S. for
    deploying its ABM on its soil as well. However, cruise and new MIRVED
    ICBM missiles, promised to be re-targeted on Europe, are not the only
    ace up Putin's sleeve. Other measures, like troop build-ups along
    southern borders in the Caucasus, new pressures on Ukraine to maintain
    the Russian Black Sea Fleet in the Crimea beyond the 2017 withdrawal
    deadline, and a refusal to leave Moldova are all in the offing among
    other measures.

    Vladimir Ryzhkov, a democratic opposition leader and a rare
    independent member of the Duma, maintains that since the U.S. started
    this controversy by walking out of the ABM Treaty in 2002, there is a
    grain of truth in Putin's assertion that Russia was forced to
    respond. But Ryzhkov sees Putin's saber-rattling as "primarily an
    election year message to the country: 'Your leader won't budge, no
    matter who formally becomes next President'." Polls show that this
    line works, Ryzhkov says: the Russians really buy it.

    But the rest of the world may not. The European Union and NATO have
    already expressed their regrets about Putin's action. "It is a step in
    the wrong direction," NATO spokesman James Appathurai said in
    Brussels.

    In fact, as no provision for a unilateral moratorium was built into
    the CFE treaty, Russia's action amounts to non-compliance, strictly
    speaking. It might indeed be designed for domestic consumption. Or it
    might be just an act of blackmail in Putin's new brinkmanship with the
    U.S. But it also might be serious water testing on his part to see how
    far he can stretch his empire-building muscle and get away with it.
Working...
X