Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Heads Of "Royal Armenia" Company Are Acquited And Set Free From Cour

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Heads Of "Royal Armenia" Company Are Acquited And Set Free From Cour

    HEADS OF "ROYAL ARMENIA" COMPANY ARE ACQUITED AND SET FREE FROM COURT HALL

    Noyan Tapan
    Jul 17 2007

    YEREVAN JULY 17, NOYAN TAPAN. The Court of First Instance of the
    Kentron and Nork-Marash communities of Yerevan with judge Pargev
    Ohanian at the head on July 16 made a decision to bring in a verdict of
    not guilty for Gagik Hakobian, the co-holder of the "Royal Armenia"
    company, and Aram Ghazarian, the Deputy Director of the company,
    who were set free from the court hall.

    It should be mentioned that this criminal case was filed on March
    10, 2005.

    Gagik Hakobian and Aram Ghazarian were put under arrest in the
    seventh month of the preliminary investigation. The verdict was
    envisaged to be published on June 28 this year. However, the court
    made a sudden decision to restart the trial of this case in order to
    make an additional investigation of the conclusions of examinations
    of judicial criminology, judicial accountancy and judicial economics.

    According to the decision of the court, the charges of simulating
    invoices and purposefully evading the payment of taxes through them,
    smuggling, making the incomes received in a criminal way legal, that is
    to say, money laundering, as well as that of seizing the property of
    the "FIG" ("Federal Investigation Group") company through deception
    were brought against the defendants by the criminal prosecution
    body on the bases of assumptions. The court found that the deeds the
    defendants are charged with have not been proved and are groundless.

    In addition to this, the investigation of the originals of the
    invoices, as well as of their copies and other documents examined
    by the hearing has revealed that there are discrepancies between
    the copies of the invoices presented to the investigation by Vache
    Petrosian, a representative of the "Federal Investigation Group",
    and the data of other documents concerning goods. According to
    the court, Vache Petrosian presented not one of the three invoices,
    which were given to a person, who transported the load of the "Federal
    Investigation Group" company, where the real price and seals of goods
    should be seen, but the xerocopies of a version of that document
    with changed data. Thus, he created artificial proof in order to
    charge the defendants with the committment of especially serious
    crimes. Therefore, the court decided to turn to the RA Prosecutor
    General with a petition to file a criminal prosecution towards
    V. Petrosian, who is a witness of the case, on the indications of the
    first, second, and third points of Article 333 of the RA Criminal
    Code for giving false testimony and creating artificial proof for
    mercenary motives and thus charging the person with a serious crime.
Working...
X