Tweet
http://www.townonline.com/watertown/opinions/x1189 853281
The Watertown TAB
Watertown, MA
Editorial: Watertown should keep `No Place for Hate'
It appears that the national head of the Anti-Defamation League lobbied
against Congressional recognition of the Armenian Genocide.
And, understandably, this has stirred up some strong feelings right here in
Watertown.
As you can see from a surge of letters to the editor, as seen on the
opposite page, the action by the ADL's national director, Abraham Foxman,
has some residents so furious that they are calling for an end to the
Watertown's participation in the ADL-sponsored `No Place for Hate' program.
Town councilors recently reaffirmed Watertown's participation in the
program, which aims to `provide communities with a solid framework for
promoting an inclusive environment while fighting all forms of hate and
bigotry,' according to its Web site.
But now, some say Watertown must respond to Foxman's action by pulling the
town out of `No Place for Hate.'
More than 8 percent of Watertown residents trace their heritage back to
Armenia, according to the Census. The actual number may be higher. Certainly
Watertown became a sanctuary for Armenians fleeing the World War I-era
attempt by the Turkish government to wipe them out.
Turkey's government continues to deny that the mass deaths of Armenians were
the result of government policy. To Turkey's great shame, it is still a
crime to `insult Turkishness' by calling it what is clearly was: genocide.
More than a million ethnic Armenians died in what was without doubt a
program by the Turkish government to eradicate Armenians. Hitler publicly
admired Turkey's methods.
The Armenian Genocide bill, House bill 106, is now in the House Foreign
Affairs Committee. There's a similar bill in the Senate. The new
Democratically controlled Congress appears to offer the best chance in years
of putting the U.S. government on record as calling Turkey to account for
its systematic campaign to eliminate Armenians.
So why in the world would the head of the ADL, an organization with a proud
history of fighting anti-Semitism and racism, argue against U.S. government
recognition of the Armenian Genocide?
Here's what Foxman said, according to the L.A. Times:
`I don't think a bill in Congress will help reconcile this issue. The
resolution takes a position. It comes to a judgment. The Turks and Armenians
need to revisit their past. The Jewish community shouldn't be the arbiter of
that history. And I don't think the U.S. Congress should be the arbiter,
either.'
It boggles the mind that the head of the ADL could actively work against
recognition of a genocide, given the centrality of the Holocaust to the
ADL's work.
But Foxman's line of thought isn't different from that of other public
figures from Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to a wide range of members
of Congress: As a moderate Muslim state, Turkey is an important U.S. ally.
And Turkey may be the closest thing to an ally that Israel has among states
with a Muslim majority. Pushing recognition of the Armenian Genocide could
result in Turkey taking actions against U.S. and Israeli interests.
This `realpolitik' way of thinking envisions Turkish hardliners retaliating
by, for instance, shutting down U.S. military bases in Turkey. The thinking
goes: Israel still faces an existential threat from its neighbors, so
keeping Turkey friendly is a greater good than righting a historical wrong.
But these considerations of geo-politics should be removed from the
discussion about whether Watertown should participate in `No Place for
Hate.'
While `No Place for Hate' has attracted a vocal minority of people who make
the specious claim that it somehow muzzles free speech, the program itself
is a good one. It's a public statement that Watertown stands against bigotry
and hate.
`No Place for Hate' was created by the ADL New England Region, in
partnership with the Massachusetts Municipal Association. It has virtually
nothing to do with Foxman's national organization.
`The local `No Place for Hate' is very committed to efforts to reinforce
tolerance,' said Will Twombly, co-chairperson of the program's Watertown
committee. `We are not in any way part of efforts to deny the Armenian
Genocide.'
Watertown shouldn't pull out of `No Place to Hate' over Foxman's
hypocritical decision to work against governmental recognition of the
Armenian Genocide. To do so would be `throwing the baby out with the bath
water.'
The goals of `No Place for Hate' track well with the moral imperative to
recognize the Armenian Genocide. Put another way, when our friends
disappoint us, the solution isn't to stop being friends. It's to work to
bring our friends around.
Putting pressure on Foxman to reverse his stance is a good thing.
Getting rid of `No Place for Hate' in Watertown isn't.
The Watertown TAB
Watertown, MA
Editorial: Watertown should keep `No Place for Hate'
It appears that the national head of the Anti-Defamation League lobbied
against Congressional recognition of the Armenian Genocide.
And, understandably, this has stirred up some strong feelings right here in
Watertown.
As you can see from a surge of letters to the editor, as seen on the
opposite page, the action by the ADL's national director, Abraham Foxman,
has some residents so furious that they are calling for an end to the
Watertown's participation in the ADL-sponsored `No Place for Hate' program.
Town councilors recently reaffirmed Watertown's participation in the
program, which aims to `provide communities with a solid framework for
promoting an inclusive environment while fighting all forms of hate and
bigotry,' according to its Web site.
But now, some say Watertown must respond to Foxman's action by pulling the
town out of `No Place for Hate.'
More than 8 percent of Watertown residents trace their heritage back to
Armenia, according to the Census. The actual number may be higher. Certainly
Watertown became a sanctuary for Armenians fleeing the World War I-era
attempt by the Turkish government to wipe them out.
Turkey's government continues to deny that the mass deaths of Armenians were
the result of government policy. To Turkey's great shame, it is still a
crime to `insult Turkishness' by calling it what is clearly was: genocide.
More than a million ethnic Armenians died in what was without doubt a
program by the Turkish government to eradicate Armenians. Hitler publicly
admired Turkey's methods.
The Armenian Genocide bill, House bill 106, is now in the House Foreign
Affairs Committee. There's a similar bill in the Senate. The new
Democratically controlled Congress appears to offer the best chance in years
of putting the U.S. government on record as calling Turkey to account for
its systematic campaign to eliminate Armenians.
So why in the world would the head of the ADL, an organization with a proud
history of fighting anti-Semitism and racism, argue against U.S. government
recognition of the Armenian Genocide?
Here's what Foxman said, according to the L.A. Times:
`I don't think a bill in Congress will help reconcile this issue. The
resolution takes a position. It comes to a judgment. The Turks and Armenians
need to revisit their past. The Jewish community shouldn't be the arbiter of
that history. And I don't think the U.S. Congress should be the arbiter,
either.'
It boggles the mind that the head of the ADL could actively work against
recognition of a genocide, given the centrality of the Holocaust to the
ADL's work.
But Foxman's line of thought isn't different from that of other public
figures from Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to a wide range of members
of Congress: As a moderate Muslim state, Turkey is an important U.S. ally.
And Turkey may be the closest thing to an ally that Israel has among states
with a Muslim majority. Pushing recognition of the Armenian Genocide could
result in Turkey taking actions against U.S. and Israeli interests.
This `realpolitik' way of thinking envisions Turkish hardliners retaliating
by, for instance, shutting down U.S. military bases in Turkey. The thinking
goes: Israel still faces an existential threat from its neighbors, so
keeping Turkey friendly is a greater good than righting a historical wrong.
But these considerations of geo-politics should be removed from the
discussion about whether Watertown should participate in `No Place for
Hate.'
While `No Place for Hate' has attracted a vocal minority of people who make
the specious claim that it somehow muzzles free speech, the program itself
is a good one. It's a public statement that Watertown stands against bigotry
and hate.
`No Place for Hate' was created by the ADL New England Region, in
partnership with the Massachusetts Municipal Association. It has virtually
nothing to do with Foxman's national organization.
`The local `No Place for Hate' is very committed to efforts to reinforce
tolerance,' said Will Twombly, co-chairperson of the program's Watertown
committee. `We are not in any way part of efforts to deny the Armenian
Genocide.'
Watertown shouldn't pull out of `No Place to Hate' over Foxman's
hypocritical decision to work against governmental recognition of the
Armenian Genocide. To do so would be `throwing the baby out with the bath
water.'
The goals of `No Place for Hate' track well with the moral imperative to
recognize the Armenian Genocide. Put another way, when our friends
disappoint us, the solution isn't to stop being friends. It's to work to
bring our friends around.
Putting pressure on Foxman to reverse his stance is a good thing.
Getting rid of `No Place for Hate' in Watertown isn't.