Tweet
KHACHIK MANUKIAN, FORMER CANDIDATE FOR DEPUTY'S MANDATE OF ELECTORAL DISTRICT N 15 APPEALS AGAINST DISTRICT ELECTORAL COMMISSION'S NEGLIGENCE
Noyan Tapan
Jul 26, 2007
YEREVAN, JULY 26, NOYAN TAPAN. The first instance court of Aragatsotn
region, at the July 26 sitting, presided over by judge Manuk Margarian,
examined the lawsuit of Khachik Manukian, former candidate for deputy's
mandate from electoral district N 15, against the district electoral
commission. The court will pronounce the sentence on July 27. As Noyan
Tapan correspondent was informed by Hovhannes Asatrian, the Chairman
of district electoral commission N 15, the claimant appealed against
the commission's negligence at the court.
It should be mentioned that Khachik Manukian, a shoemaker by his
speciality, who had nominated his candidature at the by-elections to
be held at the above mentioned electoral district on August 26, had
withdrawn his candidature by an ordered letter before registration
of candidates, on the basis of which the commission did not register
his candidature. The former candidate asserts that he had not sent
the above mentioned letter and the commission was obliged to invite
him to the sitting convened on the issue of registration of candidates.
Noyan Tapan
Jul 26, 2007
YEREVAN, JULY 26, NOYAN TAPAN. The first instance court of Aragatsotn
region, at the July 26 sitting, presided over by judge Manuk Margarian,
examined the lawsuit of Khachik Manukian, former candidate for deputy's
mandate from electoral district N 15, against the district electoral
commission. The court will pronounce the sentence on July 27. As Noyan
Tapan correspondent was informed by Hovhannes Asatrian, the Chairman
of district electoral commission N 15, the claimant appealed against
the commission's negligence at the court.
It should be mentioned that Khachik Manukian, a shoemaker by his
speciality, who had nominated his candidature at the by-elections to
be held at the above mentioned electoral district on August 26, had
withdrawn his candidature by an ordered letter before registration
of candidates, on the basis of which the commission did not register
his candidature. The former candidate asserts that he had not sent
the above mentioned letter and the commission was obliged to invite
him to the sitting convened on the issue of registration of candidates.