Tweet
SOVIET BACKGROUND SEPARATES TWO ARMENIAN CHURCHES IN US
By Olesya Vartanyan
AXcess News, KY
Source: Scripps Howard Foundation Wire
http://www.axcessnews.com/index.php/articles/ show/id/11419
June 28 2007
(AXcess News) Washington - There are two Armenian churches in the
Northwestern part of the city that are a 10 minute walk from each
other. But the relationship distance is farther than that.
Although these churches have the same religious ceremonies and books,
they are led by two different Catholicoses, who are the heads of
different branches - similar to archbishops - of the same Armenian
Apostolic Church.
Both claim to be the Armenian Apostolic Church, but since 1958 they
officially have operated separately. The split occurred because of
Soviet-era politics. Each says the other is also part of the church,
but they don't cooperate, and at times members refused to allow their
children to marry each other.
The churches are called the Etchmiadzin branch and the Cilicia branch
by some, though neither church accepts those names officially, each
calling itself Armenian Apostolic. The two names come from Armenian
geographic areas. Cilicia is now part of Turkey.
About 1 million Armenians live in the U.S., according to the Armenian
Embassy. A third of them are in one church, and another third are in
the other, according to these churches. The rest don't usually go to
these churches.
The division of the Armenian Apostolic Church in the U.S. began after
the Revolution of Bolsheviks in the former Soviet Union in 1917. One
part of the Armenian Church claimed it want to be separate from the
head, whose seat was in Etchmiadzin, Armenia. Armenia was then a Soviet
republic, and some Armenians in the U.S. thought Moscow tried to use
the Armenian Church to promote Communists' ideas outside the country.
In Armenian Apostolic Churches all over the U.S., priests from the
different churches sometimes didn't talk to each other.
"First time [after the division], Armenian families usually didn't
let men from one church to marry ladies from another church. But then
the situation improved," said a priest from the Etchmiadzin branch's
St. Mary Church in Washington, the Rev. Father Vertanes Kalayjian.
An Armenian man, Daron Bolat, 29, who runs an Armenian youth
organization, is not married but he said it wouldn't matter to him
if his wife came from another church. He said 15 years ago it was
sometimes a problem for local Armenians if a fiancee was from one
church and a fiance from the other.
"I know some stories when family didn't talk to their girl because
she married to a boy from another church," Bolat said.
All his family attends the Etchmiadzin branch's church in Washington.
He has never been in the neighbor Cilicia branch's church, as he is
"always on Sunday services in my church," he said.
"I don't think they are bad. I don't have anything against them,"
Bolat said.
Since the collapse of the USSR, there is no longer any suspicion about
political alienation of the Etchmiadzin Church toward Communists. But
the churches don't seem to be in a hurry to reunite.
An expert in political issues, Gevorg Melikyan, who is a vice-president
of a nonprofit organization, "National Spiritual Security" in Yerevan,
Armenia, said in an e-mail that politics is the main reason the
churches haven't gotten back together.
The idea of a separation of two churches was promoted by the Armenian
Revolutionary Party also known as Dashnaktsutun. This social-democratic
party ruled Armenia for about a year in 1920s before the Soviet
Bolsheviks occupied the country. Some of ARP's rulers immigrated to
the U.S. and tried to struggle against Communists from here.
Members of this party once were not allowed to attend Etchmiadzin
branch churches in U.S. It became one of the reasons ARP began to
discourage people from attending these churches and for bringing
the Cilicia church's representatives here from Lebanon. It became a
scandal inside the Armenian community.
"Once, they came to one of our services and were pretending they were
coming to the priest to kiss the cross. They came, surrounded the
priest and killed him with knives during the service," Kalayjian said.
He still believes ARP has an influence on the Cilicia Church.
"If there were not Dashnaks, we would unite," he said.
Kalayjian represents a common point of view in the Armenian
Community. Some of them think that ARP has an interest in a separate
Cilicia Church to preserve its influence among Armenians.
ARP is one of the influential political parties in the Armenian
Parliament today. But some experts say that ARP's main force is in
the Armenian Diaspora, which includes about 6 million people around
the world, according to the official statistics of Armenian government.
The executive director of the American National Committee of Armenia,
which is the U.S. East Cost representative of ARP, Jirayr Beugekian
said there was a stereotype of their interest of having Armenian
churches apart.
"We have a long history in cooperating with the Cilicia Church. And
with the Etchmiadzin Church, we began work not a long time ago. So
sometimes people say we work more with Cilicia church, but for us
they both are the same as long as there is no Soviet regime any more,"
Beugekian said.
"There is no political solution to this problem. The religious Churches
should agree with each other," he said.
After the collapse of the Soviet Union, a new government of an
independent Armenia tried to support the unification of two Armenian
churches. But until now, these Churches have only official relations.
A priest of Cilicia branch's St. Cross Church a few blocks outside
Washington in Maryland, the Rev. Father Sarkis Aktavoukian said he
had some personal contacts with people from the other church. But
he said that there were some people in the Etchmiadzin branch who
offended him personally when they sometimes said that "we are a sect."
"I know that our heads are talking about unification. But there are
some details in their disputes that we don't know," Aktavoukian said.
In the U.S., two public commissions were formed to discuss possible
reunion of churches. John Jerikyan of Washington participated in
both. He said there was no possibility to settle this dispute as
"some sides didn't want to unite." He said that, besides background
problems, some people have personal reasons for not uniting.
"It's a financial dispute. You lose control, you lose money if they
are together," Jerikyan said.
Jerikyan, 67, is a salesman who attends Cilicia branch St. Cross
Church. All his family is in this church. Jerikyan said a priest from
another church is his good friend.
"I don't want it to be as it is now. Who wins? Nobody wins! I wish to
have a united church to bring there my grandchildren," Jerikyan said.
But Kalayjian, the priest from the neighboring Etchmiadzin branch's
Church, said that the unification will not happen in a short period.
"There should be a very strong person to unite these two Churches.
Now we don't have such a man," he said.
By Olesya Vartanyan
AXcess News, KY
Source: Scripps Howard Foundation Wire
http://www.axcessnews.com/index.php/articles/ show/id/11419
June 28 2007
(AXcess News) Washington - There are two Armenian churches in the
Northwestern part of the city that are a 10 minute walk from each
other. But the relationship distance is farther than that.
Although these churches have the same religious ceremonies and books,
they are led by two different Catholicoses, who are the heads of
different branches - similar to archbishops - of the same Armenian
Apostolic Church.
Both claim to be the Armenian Apostolic Church, but since 1958 they
officially have operated separately. The split occurred because of
Soviet-era politics. Each says the other is also part of the church,
but they don't cooperate, and at times members refused to allow their
children to marry each other.
The churches are called the Etchmiadzin branch and the Cilicia branch
by some, though neither church accepts those names officially, each
calling itself Armenian Apostolic. The two names come from Armenian
geographic areas. Cilicia is now part of Turkey.
About 1 million Armenians live in the U.S., according to the Armenian
Embassy. A third of them are in one church, and another third are in
the other, according to these churches. The rest don't usually go to
these churches.
The division of the Armenian Apostolic Church in the U.S. began after
the Revolution of Bolsheviks in the former Soviet Union in 1917. One
part of the Armenian Church claimed it want to be separate from the
head, whose seat was in Etchmiadzin, Armenia. Armenia was then a Soviet
republic, and some Armenians in the U.S. thought Moscow tried to use
the Armenian Church to promote Communists' ideas outside the country.
In Armenian Apostolic Churches all over the U.S., priests from the
different churches sometimes didn't talk to each other.
"First time [after the division], Armenian families usually didn't
let men from one church to marry ladies from another church. But then
the situation improved," said a priest from the Etchmiadzin branch's
St. Mary Church in Washington, the Rev. Father Vertanes Kalayjian.
An Armenian man, Daron Bolat, 29, who runs an Armenian youth
organization, is not married but he said it wouldn't matter to him
if his wife came from another church. He said 15 years ago it was
sometimes a problem for local Armenians if a fiancee was from one
church and a fiance from the other.
"I know some stories when family didn't talk to their girl because
she married to a boy from another church," Bolat said.
All his family attends the Etchmiadzin branch's church in Washington.
He has never been in the neighbor Cilicia branch's church, as he is
"always on Sunday services in my church," he said.
"I don't think they are bad. I don't have anything against them,"
Bolat said.
Since the collapse of the USSR, there is no longer any suspicion about
political alienation of the Etchmiadzin Church toward Communists. But
the churches don't seem to be in a hurry to reunite.
An expert in political issues, Gevorg Melikyan, who is a vice-president
of a nonprofit organization, "National Spiritual Security" in Yerevan,
Armenia, said in an e-mail that politics is the main reason the
churches haven't gotten back together.
The idea of a separation of two churches was promoted by the Armenian
Revolutionary Party also known as Dashnaktsutun. This social-democratic
party ruled Armenia for about a year in 1920s before the Soviet
Bolsheviks occupied the country. Some of ARP's rulers immigrated to
the U.S. and tried to struggle against Communists from here.
Members of this party once were not allowed to attend Etchmiadzin
branch churches in U.S. It became one of the reasons ARP began to
discourage people from attending these churches and for bringing
the Cilicia church's representatives here from Lebanon. It became a
scandal inside the Armenian community.
"Once, they came to one of our services and were pretending they were
coming to the priest to kiss the cross. They came, surrounded the
priest and killed him with knives during the service," Kalayjian said.
He still believes ARP has an influence on the Cilicia Church.
"If there were not Dashnaks, we would unite," he said.
Kalayjian represents a common point of view in the Armenian
Community. Some of them think that ARP has an interest in a separate
Cilicia Church to preserve its influence among Armenians.
ARP is one of the influential political parties in the Armenian
Parliament today. But some experts say that ARP's main force is in
the Armenian Diaspora, which includes about 6 million people around
the world, according to the official statistics of Armenian government.
The executive director of the American National Committee of Armenia,
which is the U.S. East Cost representative of ARP, Jirayr Beugekian
said there was a stereotype of their interest of having Armenian
churches apart.
"We have a long history in cooperating with the Cilicia Church. And
with the Etchmiadzin Church, we began work not a long time ago. So
sometimes people say we work more with Cilicia church, but for us
they both are the same as long as there is no Soviet regime any more,"
Beugekian said.
"There is no political solution to this problem. The religious Churches
should agree with each other," he said.
After the collapse of the Soviet Union, a new government of an
independent Armenia tried to support the unification of two Armenian
churches. But until now, these Churches have only official relations.
A priest of Cilicia branch's St. Cross Church a few blocks outside
Washington in Maryland, the Rev. Father Sarkis Aktavoukian said he
had some personal contacts with people from the other church. But
he said that there were some people in the Etchmiadzin branch who
offended him personally when they sometimes said that "we are a sect."
"I know that our heads are talking about unification. But there are
some details in their disputes that we don't know," Aktavoukian said.
In the U.S., two public commissions were formed to discuss possible
reunion of churches. John Jerikyan of Washington participated in
both. He said there was no possibility to settle this dispute as
"some sides didn't want to unite." He said that, besides background
problems, some people have personal reasons for not uniting.
"It's a financial dispute. You lose control, you lose money if they
are together," Jerikyan said.
Jerikyan, 67, is a salesman who attends Cilicia branch St. Cross
Church. All his family is in this church. Jerikyan said a priest from
another church is his good friend.
"I don't want it to be as it is now. Who wins? Nobody wins! I wish to
have a united church to bring there my grandchildren," Jerikyan said.
But Kalayjian, the priest from the neighboring Etchmiadzin branch's
Church, said that the unification will not happen in a short period.
"There should be a very strong person to unite these two Churches.
Now we don't have such a man," he said.