Tweet
I PROPOSE THE PARLIAMENT ADOPT LAW CONDEMNING BOLSHEVISM
Gagik Avanesyan
KarabakhOpen
Hadrut
15-03-2007 10:21:44
The foreign policy of Armenia focuses on the recognition of the
Genocide.
And it turns out that whenever this issue is raised in an organization
(like it was under B. Clinton), the foreign policy of Armenia and
NKR collapses.
Therefore, the foreign affair agencies should not focus on one
direction. New solutions are necessary which are not dictated by
foreign actors.
I think the parliaments of Armenia and NKR can "facilitate" the
resolution of the Karabakh issue by adopting a law condemning
bolshevism. Not communism which is associated with socialism by
most people in Russia, as well as European countries, and is a very
sensitive topic to them, but bolshevism which was condemned by the 20th
conference of the USSR Communist Party. Due to bolshevism Turks got a
major part of the Armenian territory, Nakhidjevan and Karabakh. Due
to bolshevism the agreement of Sevres was not brought into being,
by which the Armenians would get the Armenian territories back.
The law should be adopted without a retrospective look at the partisan
past of the government officials. Moreover, the adoption of the
law would oblige the Armenian members of the European parliament,
independent from what party's members they are, to vote for a similar
resolution which will be presented sooner or later by the Baltic
States, proposing to replace communism with bolshevism.
With regard to bolshevism, and the Baltic States identify it with
fascism, Armenia is the only post-Soviet country whose interests
coincide with the interests of the Baltic States.
Afterwards it would be possible to raise the issue of reconsideration
of agreements signed by Bolshevist Russia, which affected the interests
of the Armenians, other ethnic minorities, reconsideration of the
borders between states which were viewed as internal borders of the
USSR by the international community, were arbitrarily drawn by the
Bolshevists and were not reconsidered after World War II.
Gagik Avanesyan
KarabakhOpen
Hadrut
15-03-2007 10:21:44
The foreign policy of Armenia focuses on the recognition of the
Genocide.
And it turns out that whenever this issue is raised in an organization
(like it was under B. Clinton), the foreign policy of Armenia and
NKR collapses.
Therefore, the foreign affair agencies should not focus on one
direction. New solutions are necessary which are not dictated by
foreign actors.
I think the parliaments of Armenia and NKR can "facilitate" the
resolution of the Karabakh issue by adopting a law condemning
bolshevism. Not communism which is associated with socialism by
most people in Russia, as well as European countries, and is a very
sensitive topic to them, but bolshevism which was condemned by the 20th
conference of the USSR Communist Party. Due to bolshevism Turks got a
major part of the Armenian territory, Nakhidjevan and Karabakh. Due
to bolshevism the agreement of Sevres was not brought into being,
by which the Armenians would get the Armenian territories back.
The law should be adopted without a retrospective look at the partisan
past of the government officials. Moreover, the adoption of the
law would oblige the Armenian members of the European parliament,
independent from what party's members they are, to vote for a similar
resolution which will be presented sooner or later by the Baltic
States, proposing to replace communism with bolshevism.
With regard to bolshevism, and the Baltic States identify it with
fascism, Armenia is the only post-Soviet country whose interests
coincide with the interests of the Baltic States.
Afterwards it would be possible to raise the issue of reconsideration
of agreements signed by Bolshevist Russia, which affected the interests
of the Armenians, other ethnic minorities, reconsideration of the
borders between states which were viewed as internal borders of the
USSR by the international community, were arbitrarily drawn by the
Bolshevists and were not reconsidered after World War II.