Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Armenian Reporter - 3/17/2007 - Arts & Culture section

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Armenian Reporter - 3/17/2007 - Arts & Culture section

    ARMENIAN REPORTER
    PO Box 129
    Paramus, New Jersey 07652
    Tel: 1-201-226-1995
    Fax: 1-201-226-1660
    Web: http://www.reporter.am
    Email: [email protected]

    March 17, 2007 -- From the arts & culture section
    All of the articles that appear below are special to the ARMENIAN REPORTER

    Briefly
    1. WAR AND PEACE at the Tribeca Film Festival
    2. Homeland & diaspora on film
    3. San Francisco Film Festival wants your film
    4. Ken Davitian scores new role in GET SMART
    5. Davitian to appear in upcoming indie feature FLOAT

    6. Q&A with STONE TIME TOUCH filmmaker Gariné Torossian (Paul Chaderjian)

    7. An exclusive, in-depth interview with "La Grande Dame" of Armenian
    Cinema, Actress Arsinée Khanjian (Paul Chaderjian)

    8. In her own words: Shooting in Bulgaria (by Arsinée Khanjian)

    9. The return of opera to the Opera House: A new production of opera
    Arshak II opens in Yerevan

    10. Continuing the literary legacy of "the Attic" in the 21st century:
    Weekly talk show features Armenian literary and cultural personalities
    (by Paul Chaderjian)

    11. Genocide and Egoyan (by Paul Chaderjian)

    ************************************* **************************************

    Briefly

    1 . WAR AND PEACE at the Tribeca Film Festival

    Vardan Hovanesyan's docudrama A STORY OF PEOPLE IN WAR AND PEACE has
    been chosen by the prestigious Tribeca Film Festival, which will take
    place from April 25 to May 6. The film calls itself the first
    international documentary about the Karabakh war, because it was
    coproduced by the likes of the BBC, ARTE, and UNESCO. Hovanesyan, a
    Karabakh war veteran, used footage he shot 12 years ago to tell the
    story of the liberation war. The filmmaker tracked down some of those
    who survived the brutal war and interviewed them for the film.
    Producers at Bars Media in Armenia tell the ARMENIAN REPORTER that the
    film has been screened at the Barcelona, Amsterdam, and Copenhagen
    film festivals. The Tribeca screening will the its U.S. premiere, and
    an Armenian-language version of the film will be screening in Yerevan
    later this year.

    connect:
    www.warandpeacefilm.com
    www.tribec afilmfestival.com

    * * *

    2. Homeland & diaspora on film

    Contemporary Armenian society through the eyes of two filmmakers is
    the theme of a film night organized by the Hamazkayin Boston chapter.
    "The Armenian Homeland and Diaspora: Reflections of Two Filmmakers"
    will take place on Friday, March 23 at 7 p.m. Organized by the Boston
    chapter of Hamazkayin, the Amaras Art Alliance, and the Harvard Film
    Archive, the program will examine the eastern and western sides of
    Armenian society. The films of directors Nigol Bezjian and Harutyun
    Khachatryan will be featured. Nora Nercessian from the Golden Apricot
    Film Festival is scheduled to talk. Khachatryan's 82-minute film is
    called RETURN OF THE POET (Poeti veratartse). Bezjian's 35-minute and
    15-minute films to be screened are ROADS FULL OF APRICOTS and VERVE.

    connect:
    http://hamazkayin-boston.org
    http ://hcl.harvard.edu/hfa

    * * *

    3. San Francisco Film Festival wants your film

    The 2008 San Francisco Film Festival is a year away, but organizers
    are already asking for submissions. The deadline for VHS or DVD copies
    of documentaries, features, shorts, and experimental or animated films
    and videos is June 1. The festival will take place February 15-17,
    2008, and its mission is to share with the public films made by
    Armenians and films that have Armenian themes.

    connect:
    www.armenianfilmfestival.org

    * * *

    4. Ken Davitian scores new role in GET SMART

    The biggest Armenian box office draw this year has another big role
    coming up. Actor Ken Davitian, whose movie BORAT hit DVD stands this
    week, will be part of the upcoming GET SMART feature. Davitian will be
    playing an evil sidekick of KAOS agents in a movie based on the Agent
    Maxwell Smart's adventures on the small screen. Davitian will be
    playing opposite 40-YEAR-OLD VIRGIN's Steve Carell, who will play
    Agent Smart. Alan Arkin will be playing the Chief of Control.

    "It's really an honor for me to work on this," says Ken. As long as he
    doesn't speak Armenian in this role. And while he is preparing for the
    role, Davitian can be seen hanging out at his sandwich shop next to
    the Kodak Theatre in Hollywood. It's called the Dip. (For real. No pun
    intended).

    connect:
    http://myspace.com/kendav itian

    * * *

    5. Davitian to appear in upcoming indie feature FLOAT

    Principal photography has wrapped up on writer-director Johnny
    Asuncion's feature costarring Hrach Titizian. Ken Davitian also has a
    small role in the film, which is about a middle-aged ice cream shop
    owner, who ends up living with his 20-somethings employees after
    leaving his wife. The film is set in Glendale, where producers say
    they received a lot of help from the local Armenian community. In
    addition to playing a lead role, Hrach Titizian is producing the film.
    Hrach may be familiar to fans of 24, THE NINE, LAS VEGAS, and THE
    SHIELD. He's played several roles on these shows as well as on an
    upcoming Jamie Foxx-Jason Bateman feature titled THE KINGDOM.

    connect:
    www.floatmovie.com

    *********** ************************************************** **************

    6. Q&A with STONE TIME TOUCH filmmaker Gariné Torossian

    Gariné Torossian, whose STONE TIME TOUCH will be shown in New York
    City this week, spoke to the ARMENIAN REPORTER's Paul Chaderjian.

    PC: I would love to know about your Berlin experience, what you felt
    while seeing the film up on the screen, what the audience reaction was
    afterward, and how this will affect your career as a filmmaker.

    GT: For me screening in Berlin was very important for various reasons.
    This was the world premiere of STONE TIME TOUCH in the Forum section
    of the festival. I had showed my second short film GIRL FROM MOUSH in
    Berlin in the Panorama section. These two films connect in that they
    are both about the issue of imagined versus the true homeland. The
    Berlin Film Festival is a very important festival and a launching
    ground to be invited to various other festivals. Upcoming, I will be
    showing at the Museum of Modern Art in New York, Hot Doc Documentary
    Film Festival in Toronto, Vision du Reel in Switzerland, and Karlovy
    Vary in the Czech Republic.

    Seeing my film on the big screen was magical. The theaters are of
    superb quality and as a result all the work I put on my film shows at
    its best on the screen. The audiences here were fantastic. People
    showed a genuine curiosity in the style and subject of the film. It
    did sell out three times and the Q?&?As after the screenings were very
    stimulating. I was truly satisfied by the experience in every way. As
    a filmmaker, being accepted in the Berlinale is a big deal. For me,
    especially, showing my first feature in such a reputable festival is a
    huge encouragement. I have shown shorts in the Panaroma section of the
    festival four times in the past and have had a retrospective at the
    Arsenal section in 1998.

    PC: Tell me how you got started in film, when you realized your
    passion, where you studied and what you've done that you're proud of
    so far.

    GT: I have always been interested in the arts and in artists. I
    started with fashion design at 12 then moved on to photography and
    painting and then to film. I am self-taught. I felt with film I could
    include everything and felt that it suited my temperament most. Also,
    I felt there is a world within filmmaking that is unlimited. I find my
    films always bring me to unfamiliar territory or territory that I
    cannot reach without film. I am happy that my work has had the
    exposure it has, and it is through that that I can express and
    experience. I feel like an explorer as a filmmaker, and I love that.

    PC: Also, revisit the idea behind the film. What did you set out to
    document and how do you tell your story? Whose story is it? Where did
    you shoot and whom did you interview?

    GT: I set out with a particular mission on making this film. I knew
    what I was looking for, that is the homeland I had imagined for so
    many years. I had a strong need to find it at this point in my life.
    Although I had a mission I was open to find it without a plan. I went
    to Armenia for two months and met people, and by chance encounters I
    was guided through a very adventurous process to find what I was
    looking for.

    I wanted to explore all aspects of the culture with a strong focus on
    Armenian women. I went to various different villages, meeting a
    survivor, women working in the village and in Yerevan with artists. I
    had a protagonist who played the tourist going to Armenia for the
    first time to explore.

    Within this story is the story of Arsinée Khanjian, who speaks about
    her fourth trip to Armenia and how her relationship to Armenia has
    changed with time. She travels through Armenia experiencing different
    regions and different social conditions, also relating to us her story
    and analytical point of view. Ultimately, coming to the conclusion
    that there are only more questions now that we have established a
    relationship to Armenia. It is through my film that I got to
    investigate my past and present relationship to Armenia

    PC: What are upcoming projects you are working on and how and where
    are you spending your time. I read or heard somewhere you had been
    invited to work in Germany for six months?

    GT: I am currently residing in Berlin on a DAAD (German Academic
    Exchange Service) fellowship. In Berlin I am working on a new project.
    I am currently at the research and development phase.

    * * *

    Catch STONE TIME TOUCH at the Roy and Niuta Titus Theaters of the
    Museum of Modern Art in New York on Thursday, March 15, at 6:30 p.m.
    or on Monday, March 19, at 8:30 p.m.

    ******************************************** ********************************

    7. An exclusive, in-depth interview with "La Grande Dame" of Armenian
    Cinema, Actress Arsinée Khanjian

    * * *

    "The Lark film is the Genocide film that Armenians have been asking to
    see on the big screen for decades."

    * * *

    Based on Antonia Arslan's novel, SKYLARK'S FARM, the movie LARK FARM
    (La Masseria delle Allodole), starring Arsinée Khanjian, tells the
    story of the Armenian Genocide through the relationship of a Young
    Turk officer who falls in love with and tries to save the life of a
    young Armenian woman. Arsinée Khanjian discusses the film and much
    more with PAUL CHADERJIAN.

    The film, directed by the legendary Italian filmmaker brothers Paolo
    and Vittorio Taviani, was recently chosen to be part of the Berlin
    Film Festival. It be the released in France in June and will be the
    opening film at the fourth annual Golden Apricot Film Festival in
    Yerevan in July.

    "Berlin was really wonderful for me this time," says Arsinée Khanjian.
    "I hadn't been there before the fall of the Wall, and it's been an
    important festival in my journey." Arsinée's husband, celebrated and
    award-winning, Oscar-nominee Atom Egoyan's first features CALENDAR and
    SPEAKING PARTS were screened at the same festival.

    "Being in Berlin with LARK FARM had a big significance for me,
    especially because of STONE TOUCH TIME, an experimental documentary
    that was incredibly received at three screenings." Arsinée believes
    that Europeans connected with both Gariné Torossian's documentary (see
    page C3) and the Taviani feature film because the themes of searching
    for an identity, and past, present, and future identities are
    resonating in European communities.

    "We have carried these themes and issues in us in the diaspora. The
    trauma of the Genocide and how that has shaped us, how identities have
    allowed us to fit into the societies that we became part of, how we
    have had to reinvent our relationship with a new homeland we have
    dreamed about, these have been our issues. Now, we are exposing these
    issues and global audiences are connecting to them because they are
    dealing with these issues now."

    Arsinée says that Germans, like other Europeans, who would not have
    asked what it means to be a German twenty years ago, are now asking.
    "There are so many people from elsewhere that they are challenging
    what it means to be German," she says. "We're all asking these
    questions. Our relationship with Armenia is a timely subject to
    explore, and we have this experience because for 90 years, we were
    asking these questions."

    The Taviani film, says Arsinée, brought historic relevance and
    reference to the audience. "Intelligent, educated people, who take
    great pride in their political and human rights commitment, are
    realizing that history can be censored, and they feel uninformed and
    undignified that their own political and educational system has kept
    them uninformed about the survivors of the Armenian Genocide."

    Arsinée says having two different films at the Berlin festival gave
    her a renewed sense of how cinema can still impact people. "The two
    film were made with two different budget realities and with different
    people's motivations," says Arsinée. "It was important to have these
    two parallels and see the impact cinema can still have on people's
    sense of acquiring knowledge and enjoying artistic process."

    * Lark Farm and Ararat

    Art forms are a product of their time, says the actress as she sips
    tea to refresh her throat during the phone interview. She has been
    battling the flu since her return from Berlin, and she has a short
    break in Toronto before returning to Europe, where she will be dubbing
    the LARK film from Italian into French. Atom will also be going to
    Paris to prepare for the retrospective of his artistic canon being
    organized at the Pompidou Center as part of the Year of Armenia in
    France cultural exchange program. The leading man and first lady of
    Armenian cinema will also be taking their son Arshile along.

    "The LARK film is the Genocide film that Armenians have been asking to
    see on the big screen for decades," says Arsinée. "When ARARAT came
    out, Armenians said they wanted to see a film that described what
    happened during the Genocide. They wanted to see the film that the
    Saroyan character in ARARAT was shooting, the film that Atom didn't
    feel comfortable shooting."

    Arsinée says her husband Atom Egoyan made ARARAT to address and deal
    with the issues of identity, but that the 2002 film can complement
    LARK FARM. "This new film is the voice of two auteurs and master
    filmmakers addressing what Atom did not show completely, but only
    partially, as a device and not a complete film."

    Even though the Canadian-Hollywoodian-Armenian-Lebanese actress
    believes an Armenian Genocide film like LARK FARM should and could
    have been made thirty years ago, it is still wonderful to see it up on
    the big screen now. "It has been done with great scrutiny, artistic
    purity," says the 47-year-old actress. "It really does justice to the
    story and also to the history of the culture. The film is masterful,
    very classically, very provocatively handled by the masters of Italian
    cinema."

    * * *

    "We have a film that's fresh out of the oven that American lobbyists
    as well as Armenians in the States from the cultural perspective can
    enjoy."

    * * *

    * The Taviani brothers

    Arsinée says the Tavianis are no less than Bernardo Bertolucci or
    Michelangelo Antonioni. She believes they are more rigorous in their
    stylistic pursuit, and that they have challenged audiences with their
    award-winnings films. "THE LARK FARM is also very engaging," says
    Arsinée. "It also has offers a lot of the social psychology of the
    time and that makes the film even more powerful.

    "The Tavianis are not psychologically-driven filmmakers," says
    Arsinée. "Their cinema is about themes they explore through their
    actors, situations, and they are curious about social phenomena. At
    first when I read the script, I wondered why the Tavianis were
    interested in this story, then I realized that it fitted perfectly
    with the themes they have dealt with like Italian Fascism, the
    separation of families, the atrocities family members inflict on each
    other because of their beliefs."

    Arsinée says she believes the Taviani Brothers were drawn to THE LARK
    FARM because it gave them a chance to study a minority community's
    cultural experience in the middle of an empire. She says stories of
    how neighbors one day become enemies the next, how a newborn baby of
    one neighbor is killed by the son of the other are all stories and
    issues that have interested the brothers. "The human behavior under
    the scrutiny of social and political environment has always interested
    them," says Arsinée. "They have committed themselves to clear
    positions on how people should care about humanity."

    Italians had to deal with Fascism, says Arsinée. "They had to make an
    effort to understand the evils of it and turn it into social values.
    Germany had to deal with Nazi ideology and reconfigure its social
    ideology. If we allow Turkey to continue to indulge itself with the
    negative privileges of denial and refusal, then how can we prevent our
    history from reoccurring and reoccurring?"

    * European awareness & Turkish pressure

    Arsinée says she was amazed that there was interest in non-Armenians
    to tell the Genocide story to global audiences. "We have seldom seen
    in the last 90 years the interest of people in any field to actively
    pursue this history. It could have been my own insecurity that I was
    surprised, but Europe is looking into what is European, who is
    European."

    "Turkey's candidacy to join the union is putting this question on the
    table," says Arsinée, "and the question of the Armenian Genocide has
    become a point of consideration and a point of political currency.
    Antonia Arslan's book fits into this awareness and got the attention
    of the Tavianis. It became obvious for them to make this their next
    project."

    When word got out that the Tavianis were trying to make the novel into
    a movie, says Arsinée, the Turkish government tried to put the brakes
    on the project. "The Italian Minister of Culture asked them to
    reconsider the project," she says, "but we're not in Hollywood in the
    1940s, so the pressure did not go far. With all this as the backdrop,
    it's interesting that this film exists."

    Arsinée says she was relieved that it was shown at the Berlin Film
    Festival, because it's one of the top three festivals in the world -
    the other two being Cannes and Venice. "We couldn't have hoped for a
    more prestigious venue to show the film. There is a large Turkish
    community in Berlin, and Turkish journalists after the press screening
    were dismissing the film for technical matters, not regarding the
    artist aspect.

    "One critic said Turkey does not have to worry about this film,
    because it's very respectful. But that's not the case of the film. The
    film is respectful of the individual choices that were made in those
    times, but we have a uniform understanding of what happened. That
    understanding is not wrong, because the outcome was a million and half
    dead."

    * The individual stories

    "In the process of the pain, anger, and trauma," says Arsinée, "we
    have forgotten the individual stories. This film is a testament of the
    individual stories. These stories form the Armenian families'
    perspective, the perspective of families which were annihilated in the
    film, the perspective of the Turkish town leader, the Turkish
    neighbors."

    Arsinée believes there are beautiful ways of evoking what the victims,
    survivors, and witnesses of the atrocities lived through as friends
    and acquaintances. "There were family ties like in the main story of
    the film, which is the love story of Nunik," she says. Arsinée plays
    Nunik's sister-in-law in THE LARK FARM.

    "Nunik falls madly in love with a Turkish officer, who happens to be a
    member of the Young Turks," Arsinée explains. "So, that story has a
    tragic ending as a love story. She basically ends up the leader of the
    family after all the men in the family are beheaded.

    "There is also a touching relationship developing between Nunik and
    the man in charge of the deportees," says Arsinée. "That man becomes
    the witness to Nunik's story. He's the one in the tribunals who
    testifies, and a lot of the accounts are based on Aslan's
    grandparents, the children who survive in the film, the children who
    are my character's grandchildren."

    Arsinée says the novel upon which the film is loosely based has
    recently been published in English. The book, says Arsinée, chronicles
    the indescribable history of the family, the uprooting and complete
    devastation of everything from tradition to economic reality to
    cultural reference. Everything that was real for these families was
    tragically eliminated, she says.

    * Call to action

    "In a way, we are very lucky that this film is out there," says
    Arsinée. "It is our responsibility to do with it what we did not do
    with ARARAT. French-Armenians hardly went to see ARARAT. If ARARAT was
    not a film they were not wanting to see, and if it was ahead of its
    time, this film is something that they asked for."

    Arsinée says she is hoping that when THE LARK FARM opens in France in
    June, it will receive community support. She hoped that all Armenian
    organizations and associations mobilize the community and turn out in
    great numbers.

    "I don't know what the French critics will say," Arsinée wonders. "If
    it was made 30 years ago, it would have been a revolutionary, unusual
    film. Today the history of cinema has developed, so perhaps
    stylistically it's not unusual. I don't know what critics look for, so
    I don't know what they will say."

    Regardless of critical reaction, Arsinée says Armenians wanted to make
    this film happen, and there is a responsibility when people want
    things to happen. The responsibility with THE LARK FARM is creating
    chaos, asking for distribution and screenings, and then buying
    tickets.

    "The reality is that the film doesn't have American distribution,"
    says the actress. "What could be better than Armenian producers or
    organizations or benefactors raising funding to make this film
    commercially distributed? Who made all the films about the Holocaust?
    Who distributed the films? The Jewish community itself. So what are we
    doing? What are we doing?"

    Arsinée says Armenians have to get organized. "We don't have anyone to
    blame anymore. We have a film, and the life of a film is very short.
    Six months down the road, if it's not distributed, it's lost. I don't
    want to hear the age-old comment about groups challenging this film or
    working against it. If we don't do the work, we have no one to blame
    that our stories are not on movie screens around the world."

    * * *

    "I have optioned the rights to a play. I'll be acting in it, and I'd
    like Atom to direct it. It will happen this year. I have to get the
    funding in place. It's called Mathilde, the name of the character.
    Veronique Olmi is the playwright, and it's a wonderful play. It's in
    French, translated into English. I saw the production in Toronto, on
    stage. It's about the relationship of a middle-aged couple. It's a
    beautiful play."

    ************************************* ***************************************

    8. In her own words: Shooting in Bulgaria (by Arsinée Khanjian)

    A lot of the shooting happened in Plovdiv, Bulgaria. This town is
    important for us historically. It used to be where a lot of Armenian
    merchants were established during the Ottoman Empire. We had a big
    community in Bulgaria, and they had magnificent homes built for
    themselves. We used them while we were shooting the film. The homes
    are in a neighborhood called the Armenian Quarter. They were all
    Armenians there. The houses were nationalized in the Soviet Era, but
    Armenians are claiming them back. The houses you see in the film,
    which is in an unnamed town, belonged to Armenian merchants of the
    time.

    When I was there, I met with the Armenian community which has a school
    and a church and a dance group. They are involved in Armenian affairs.
    A lot of the background actors and extras were Armenians from
    different walks of life. And on the other hand, what is really
    important about the film is that it was not made by Armenians. There
    were actors from Palestine, an Italian star, a handsome actor playing
    the Young Turk.

    Nunik was played by a Spanish star. There were Italian actors, great
    Bulgarian theater actors playing smaller parts. So it was a very
    symbolic and wonderful experience to shoot the film with people from
    all different cultural backgrounds. All these people had to tap into
    what they knew, what they learned, what their responsibilities were in
    society. Everyone had invested their own work, their own talent with a
    real commitment and with curiosity about what the film was talking
    about.

    ********************************** ******************************************

    9. The return of opera to the Opera House: A new production of opera
    Arshak II opens in Yerevan

    For two nights in early March, opera returned to the Alexander
    Spendiaryan Opera and Ballet Academic Theater in Yerevan. Opera on the
    stage of the opera house has been rare, since the stage now mostly
    serves as a showcase for pop artists and shows.

    March 3rd was opening night of a new, fourth-generation Armenian
    production of Arshak II. (The opera had its American production in San
    Francisco in 2001.) It was staged by the acclaimed tenor and director
    of opera theater Gegham Grigoryan, directed by Karen Dourgaryan, and
    conducted by Karen Sragsyan.

    The first production of Arshak II was in the first half of 1950s.

    It is the first Armenian opera ever, composed in 1868 by the composer
    Tigran Choukhajian. Arshak II is set in 4th-century Armenia,
    politically divided between the Byzantine and Persian empires. The
    curtain opens to a festive air as King Arshak II (performed by Gevorg
    Hakobyan) returns victoriously to the palace and is praised for his
    courageous performance in battle.

    But treachery is in the air on both political and personal levels.
    Prince Tirit (performed by Gegham Grigoryan), next in line to the
    throne, tries to gain power and make an alliance with King Shabouh of
    Persia. He is also in love with his murdered brother's wife, Parandzem
    (performed by Christine Sahakyan), who begs the king for permission to
    return to her homeland, Syunik. But Arshak II himself has an eye on
    the beautiful widow, and to gain her heart he orders a castle to be
    built in her honor in the capital. Meanwhile the queen, the Greek
    Olympia (performed by Anahit Mkhitaryan), wants desperately to regain
    the heart of the king. Toward the end of the first act, the disloyalty
    of Titit is exposed and the traitor is put to death.

    The curtain reopens to uncover a conspiracy against the king, mounted
    in the court, this time involving not only the princes yearning for
    power, but also the queen, who, for the love of the king is ready to
    do anything. By now King Arshak has found a bond with Princess
    Parandzem, who gradually sympathizes with the king's vulnerability. He
    shares with her his feelings of being betrayed even by his queen,
    while Parandzem advises him to pardon the traitors. A sermon by the
    Catholicos Nerses (performed by M. Hovakimyan) also urges the king to
    be forgiving, and peace and safety apparently reign at the court and
    in the country.

    It is in the last scene that the drama reaches its peak. The court
    celebrates the apparent amity. But Parandzem notices one of the
    conspirators handing a cup of wine to the queen who offers it to the
    king. Parandzem leaps forward and begs to drink it herself. Convinced
    that the wine is pure, Queen Olympia takes a sip herself and suddenly
    flies at the king pleading not to drink from the cup. The traitors are
    put to death, but the queen breathes her last breath.

    The curtain comes down only after reestablishing King Arshak II as the
    powerful monarch of Armenia.

    The music of Arshak II has the timbre of Italian operas of that
    period, mixed with nuances of Armenian classical music, namely church
    psalms and hymns.

    Throughout the opera, the set, although with little variation, is
    rather majestic and gloomy, successfully creating the impression of a
    4th-century palace. Two giant golden eagles, the symbol of Arshakuni
    dynasty, hang high in the hall leading to the throne. The costumes,
    although lacking imagination and innovation, somehow create the
    atmosphere of that time.

    The original opera had two ballet scenes not included in this production.

    ************************************* **************************************

    10. Continuing the literary legacy of "the Attic" in the 21st century

    * Weekly talk show features Armenian literary and cultural personalities

    by Paul Chaderjian

    BURBANK, Calif. - In the mid-1800s, Armenian intellectuals living in
    Tbilisi, Georgia, gathered in literary giant Hovhannes Tumanian's
    attic or VERNADUN to discuss matters close to their hearts and minds.
    Joining Tumanian were the other giants of the time, including Avedik
    Isahagian, Derenig Demirjian, Avedis Aharonian, Gomidas, Mardiros
    Saryan, and Vahan Derian.

    In the 21st century, this meeting of the minds is being replicated in
    a large television studio near the Burbank Airport. Every week,
    writer, journalist, and Armenian language and literature professor
    Sona Tigranyan-Petrossian invites contemporary cultural figures to
    share their work and insights through an hour-long talk show called
    VERNADUN.

    Nestled in an industrial neighborhood feet from California's main
    arterial highway, Interstate 5, Petrossian's virtual VERNADUN sets out
    every Monday night to become the intellectual artery of dialogue for
    Armenian artists, painters, writers, actors, poets, and composers.

    "We serve the Armenian arts community and the Armenian people under
    the 'One Nation, One Culture' slogan," says Sevak Petrossian, the
    executive producer of the program. "As a result of the weekly
    dialogue, we are also helping boost cultural ties between Armenia and
    the diaspora."

    The place where this weekly dialogue takes place is called the
    Meridian Studio. The studio and production company are the creation of
    the 34-year-old Petrossian, whose late father, Vardges Petrossian, was
    a poet, writer, editor, publisher, and head of Armenia's Writers
    Union. Vardges Petrossian was also the publisher of the
    widely-distributed KAROON magazine. He was assassinated in Armenia in
    the early 1990s, but his legacy has been kept alive through the
    Vardges Petrossian Cultural Fund.

    "After the founding of the Vardges Petrossian Cultural Fund," says
    program host Sona Petrossian, "there were gatherings in the attic of
    our house on Verdugo Avenue in Burbank. The Los Angeles Vernadun
    successfully functioned as a studio for young, talented artists."

    After seven years of meetings and classes at the studio, many of those
    who gathered on Verdugo Avenue saw their words published and received
    a number of awards. The Board of the Vardges Petrossian Fund decided
    to enlarge their literary circle by taking their dialogue to cable
    television, and that's how Mrs. Petrossian's weekly show evolved.

    Sevak Petrossian, may be better known to REPORTER readers for the M
    Club Armenian music video awards show that he produced at the Kodak
    Theatre in Hollywood last December. Petrossian, a graduate of the
    Yerevan Art and Theater Institute, oversees several of the shows
    produced at Meridian, including VERNADUN, M CLUB, and POST SCRIPTUM.

    The younger Petrossian aspired to be a director at a young age and has
    since exercised his storytelling talents and skills by producing
    dozens of popular music videos. He has also directed several
    documentaries and short films at Armenfilm Studios, under the
    supervision of well-known Armenian actor and producer Frunze
    Dovlatyan.

    "Meridian is currently shooting short and feature films that focus on
    great Armenian artists," says Petrossian. "We are also producing talk
    shows for teenagers and children's programming. These two varieties
    are of great importance and much needed in this country.

    **************************************** ***********************************

    11. Genocide and Egoyan

    by Paul Chaderjian

    Canadian-Armenian filmmaker Atom Egoyan cannot help but continue to
    make movies that address the themes of loss and the consequences of
    trauma, because so much of his personal history is dictated by the
    loss his grandparents' generation experienced during the Armenian
    Genocide. The person that he is and the art that he creates cannot
    help but be a reaction to one of the greatest traumas suffered - one
    yet to be collectively addressed by 20th- and 21st-century
    civilization.

    While many critics and film fans believe that Egoyan's ARARAT was his
    first film about the Armenian Genocide, a careful study of Egoyan's
    previous feature films will demonstrate that all his films address the
    issue of how an individual or a group of people react and respond to
    loss. The theme of the trauma of loss, people's reaction to loss, and
    the relationship of the people dealing with loss and trauma are what
    define Egoyan's films and screenplays.

    In his first feature, NEXT OF KIN, Egoyan brings to life
    second-generation Genocide survivors who were forced midlife to move
    because of injustices they experienced in the country in which their
    parents had found haven after surviving the Genocide. Where Egoyan's
    characters, the Derian family, found themselves and where they had to
    move from is clearly the result of their parents being displaced from
    their ancestral homeland. The Derians would not have faced
    immigration, poverty and the reality of giving up their newborn son
    had it not been for the catastrophe of genocide that their parents
    escaped.

    What is more important in NEXT OF KIN is how the Derians relate to one
    another as a result of unaddressable traumas their parents survived.
    First, the Derians demonstrate that they are in a mode of extreme
    self-preservation, that even the modern dresses that their daughter
    wants to wear and the freedom of self-expression she wants to engage
    in through art are inconceivable as they relate to the values that the
    Derians are engrained with preserving.

    The second example of the Derians' dysfunctional psychology, again the
    result of genocide, is their inability to deal with the loss of their
    son through adoption. Their inability to make peace with having to
    give up their son is a double-edged sword when combined with the
    losses their parents experienced. When humans suffer from one trauma,
    the scientific community believes the trauma becomes part of their
    'operating system and all future incidents of change are perceived as
    more traumatizing that they truly are. The forced adoption of their
    son is skewed in the Derians' minds, so much so that when a stranger
    shows up and claims that he is their son, they accept him with open
    arms.

    The best example of Egoyan addressing the Armenian Genocide in movies
    other than ARARAT is in the film called THE SWEET HEREAFTER. This
    motion picture is about the deaths of children, who are killed when
    their school bus plunges into a frozen lake. What happens to a
    community after a traumatic, life-changing loss is the question that
    THE SWEET HEREAFTER asks. With the film, Egoyan asks what the world
    should have asked about the victims of the Armenian Genocide and the
    other genocides that were to follow in the 20th century. What happens
    to the survivors? What happens to those who watch their families
    perish? What happens to their psychology and how does the fragile
    human psyche deal with such an incomprehensible event?

    The perpetrator of incomprehensible acts of violence is the character
    Egoyan studies in FELICIA'S JOURNEY. At the center of this film is an
    abused, mocked, and controlled child, the offspring of a selfish
    television star, who turns out to be a cold-hearted serial killer. In
    this film, the viewer sees how the human mind can set out to
    systematically and carefully plan the murder and execute the
    annihilation of other human beings. The killer in FELICIA'S JOURNEY is
    an intelligent man who uses his ability to manipulate reality, endear
    himself to strangers, win their trust through empathy and then
    accomplish that which he planned to do - to kill. In that sense,
    FELICIA'S JOURNEY could be a study of the victim, the Armenians, and
    the victimizer, the Ottoman Turks. The way the pregnant Felicia is won
    over, her resistance is lowered, and she is eventually poisoned is
    metaphoric of how the Armenian populations were manipulated to trust
    the government under whose rule they lived, taught to trust, and then
    easily marched to their deaths.

    In THE ADJUSTER, Egoyan explores moral versus material values by
    telling the story of an Armenian woman who makes moral judgments as a
    movie censor, and her husband, who decides the material value of
    things lost in fires. THE ADJUSTER is a classic study of the clash of
    materialism and morality, and how a human internal dynamic of being
    married to one or the other make it impossible to relate to other
    humans whose dynamic is opposite theirs. The insurance adjuster, the
    materialist, is unable to understand his wife's morality-driven
    existence, in which family and history that offer the moral values are
    central.

    While loss and the trauma of genocide make the adjuster's wife who she
    is, the untamed lands of the new world filmed by Egoyan -- the parcels
    of land upon which will be built new homes and new communities -
    define the adjuster and his mission to appease those who experience
    material losses in a culture of materialism. He demonstrates, by
    sleeping with the victims of loss, that morality is secondary to his
    goal to help the victims of fires make peace with their loss of
    material. In the contradictory world of the adjuster's wife, sharing
    one's life with siblings, nurturing and making moral judgments on the
    arts that the public will consume are what drive the third-generation
    survivors of the Armenian Genocide.

    Finally, how Armenians differ in their relationship to their cultures
    is the theme of CALENDAR, in which a Middle Eastern, an American, and
    an Armenian from Armenia relate to one another. In the melting pot of
    America, the American Armenian is allowed to divorce himself from his
    reality as a genocide survivor and has no emotional connection to his
    past, which is represented by the churches he is commissioned to
    photograph. Because of his disconnect with his culture, he is on a
    mission to find, through a series of unsuccessful dates, someone that
    he can relate to.

    Opposite the American-Armenian post-Genocide experience is the
    photographer's wife from the Middle East, who has embraced survival
    and the dream of a homeland. Upon meeting the Yerevan Armenian, who is
    the driver during her and her husband's trip to Armenia, she realizes
    how much more connected the driver is to his homeland and her plight
    than the invisible American-Armenian. Through the dialogue of this
    film, the images of the homeland, the cold indifference of
    long-distance phone calls, Egoyan demonstrates how three groups of
    Armenians have evolved after the great trauma and incomprehensible
    loss of their people.

    Though Egoyan may not have set out to address themes relating to the
    Armenian Genocide in his films, he nevertheless creates and is
    attracted to stories of loss and survival after a loss. After all, an
    artist creates and expresses in his or her art themes that are unique
    to his or her experience. In Egoyan's case, what is biographically
    unique to him is the reality of his experience growing up as a third
    generation survivor of an event that shaped the characters and
    psychology of his grandparents, his parents, and in turn, the
    character of the artist that is Atom Egoyan.

    ***************************************** ***********************************
    Please send your art, culture, and entertainment news to
    [email protected] and your letters to [email protected]

    (c) 2007 CS Media Enterprises LLC. All Rights Reserved
Working...
X