Tweet
www.truthdig.com
Discrimination Claim at L.A. Times
Posted Apr. 26, 2007
Los Angeles Times Managing Editor Doug Frantz is facing accusations of
discrimination for refusing to run a report about the Armenian genocide
written by Mark Arax, a seasoned LAT writer of Armenian origin. Frantz
claims Arax was biased in his take on the issue, but Armenian community
leader Harut Sassounian says there's a much bigger story behind Frantz's
move.
From Sassounian's account on L.A. Observed:
On April 11, 2007, in an e-mail to Arax, Frantz accused him of having `a
conflict of interest that precludes you from writing about the Armenian
genocide, and particularly about an ongoing congressional debate about it.
...Your personal stance on the issue, in my view, prohibits you from writing
about the issue objectively.'
To justify his discriminatory action, Frantz used the pretext that Arax and
five other reporters at The Times had signed a joint letter in September
2005, reminding the editors that the newspaper was not complying with its
own policy of calling the Armenian Genocide, a genocide. The editors, at
that time, had no problem with that letter. On the contrary, they thanked
all six reporters - five Armenian-Americans and one Jewish-American - for the
reminder and pledged to comply with the paper's policy on this issue.
To make matters worse, in his e-mail, Frantz falsely referred to the
above-cited letter as a `petition,' and on that basis accused Arax of taking
`a position' on the Armenian Genocide. He thus implied that all six
letter-writers - Mark Arax, Ralph Vartabedian, Robin Abcarian, Greg Krikorian,
Chuck Philips, and Henry Weinstein - were political activists rather than
independent journalists.
http://www.truthdig.com/eartothegrou nd/item/discrimination_claim_at_la_times/#comments
Discrimination Claim at L.A. Times
Posted Apr. 26, 2007
Los Angeles Times Managing Editor Doug Frantz is facing accusations of
discrimination for refusing to run a report about the Armenian genocide
written by Mark Arax, a seasoned LAT writer of Armenian origin. Frantz
claims Arax was biased in his take on the issue, but Armenian community
leader Harut Sassounian says there's a much bigger story behind Frantz's
move.
From Sassounian's account on L.A. Observed:
On April 11, 2007, in an e-mail to Arax, Frantz accused him of having `a
conflict of interest that precludes you from writing about the Armenian
genocide, and particularly about an ongoing congressional debate about it.
...Your personal stance on the issue, in my view, prohibits you from writing
about the issue objectively.'
To justify his discriminatory action, Frantz used the pretext that Arax and
five other reporters at The Times had signed a joint letter in September
2005, reminding the editors that the newspaper was not complying with its
own policy of calling the Armenian Genocide, a genocide. The editors, at
that time, had no problem with that letter. On the contrary, they thanked
all six reporters - five Armenian-Americans and one Jewish-American - for the
reminder and pledged to comply with the paper's policy on this issue.
To make matters worse, in his e-mail, Frantz falsely referred to the
above-cited letter as a `petition,' and on that basis accused Arax of taking
`a position' on the Armenian Genocide. He thus implied that all six
letter-writers - Mark Arax, Ralph Vartabedian, Robin Abcarian, Greg Krikorian,
Chuck Philips, and Henry Weinstein - were political activists rather than
independent journalists.
http://www.truthdig.com/eartothegrou nd/item/discrimination_claim_at_la_times/#comments