Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

State Department's Human Rights Report

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • State Department's Human Rights Report

    Congressional Record: May 7, 2007 (House)
    >From the Congressional Record Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]

    STATE DEPARTMENT'S HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT

    The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
    gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Pallone) is recognized for 5 minutes.
    Mr. PALLONE. Mr. Speaker, each year, the Department of State issues a
    report outlining the human rights practices of various Nations, and I
    object this evening to the inaccuracies in the Armenia section of the
    2006 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices.
    Originally, the State Department issued erroneous language about
    Armenia being an occupier of Azerbaijani territory and Nagorno-
    Karabakh, the report was substantively revised with more balanced,
    although still not fully accurate, wording and then revised again to
    restore the original inaccurate language.
    I am deeply disturbed by the State Department's mischaracterization
    of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. It is unprecedented and
    counterproductive to our government's goal of actively promoting
    constructive engagement in the peace negotiations of the region. It
    also sets a troubling example by allowing a foreign State, in this case
    Azerbaijan, to shape the assessments of our human rights report.
    To assert that Nagorno-Karabakh is Azerbaijani territory or that
    Armenia occupies Nagorno-Karabakh and other territories is simply
    wrong. This version ignores the reality that the current conflict is
    about the self-determination of the people of Nagorno-Karabakh.
    Like many other ethnic autonomous regions with the status of Oblast
    under the Soviet Constitution, the people of Nagorno-Karabakh declared their
    independence. They then conducted a referendum as set forth in the same
    Soviet Constitution, and they are now an independent republic and
    should be recognized as a Nation, just like Azerbaijan, Armenia and any
    other former Soviet Republic. The situation has absolutely nothing to
    do with Armenia. The only role Armenia plays in this conflict is that
    country's part in peace negotiations.
    Mr. Speaker, I am concerned that Armenia is being characterized as an
    abuser of human rights in the region when it is Azerbaijan who
    continues to maintain a blockade of both Nagorno-Karabakh and Armenia,
    and regularly threatens a new wave of violence against Nagorno-
    Karabakh.
    Such misrepresentations will undermine our Nation's credibility as an
    impartial mediator and jeopardize prospects for successful peace
    negotiations. It could also have a negative impact on U.S.-Armenia
    relations.
    Our common aim as a country should be to focus on workable diplomacy
    that brings parties together in the spirit of conflict resolution, not
    to cause additional tension by introducing new and controversial
    elements into an already complex negotiating process.
    Mr. Speaker, the United States has a long history of supporting
    Nagorno-Karabakh's democracy and its right to live in freedom and
    peace. The State Department has never made assertions in previous
    reports about Armenia being an occupier of Azerbaijani territory and
    Nagorno-Karabakh.
    Last week, I sent a letter to Secretary Rice with my concerns over
    the State Department report's language, and I urged her to quickly
    reverse the State Department's mischaracterization.
Working...
X