Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Whose Opinion Is Important, Local Or International Observers'?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Whose Opinion Is Important, Local Or International Observers'?

    WHOSE OPINION IS IMPORTANT, LOCAL OR INTERNATIONAL OBSERVERS'?

    KarabakhOpen
    16-05-2007 14:23:47

    In many countries the law prohibits presence of foreign observers in
    the elections. Some countries stop inviting international observers at
    some stage of democratic development. After the presidential election
    in France no opinions of observers were heard. Besides, nobody seemed
    to question the legitimacy of the election. The protests were against
    the results.

    In fact, in countries where no wrongdoing is believed to be, the
    international observers have nothing to do. It means, the political
    evaluations are unnecessary. Observers are found where the conduct of
    the election is doubted, falsification is possible, non-governmental
    and political organizations are unable to provide the legitimacy of
    the voting. But even in this case the international observers give
    a political evaluation rather than an evaluation of legitimacy. And
    their evaluation is perceived in the political light.

    Obviously, too much importance is imparted to the opinion of
    the international observers in Armenia. In addition, their
    evaluation is believed to be the most objective and the most
    political. Interestingly, the evaluations of voters and local observers
    are not taken into account, whereas the statements of the observers
    from the other side of the cordon become almost as forceful as a law.

    The Armenian media reported that the EU stated "with pleasure"
    that the parliamentary elections in Armenia largely complied
    with international standards and were largely in accordance with
    international commitments. The EU endorsed promotion of partnership
    with Armenia, which will promote the New Neighbors Policy and the
    Action Plan (here is a political evaluation).

    Tom Casey, State Department's Deputy Spokesman, stated that this
    election is an improvement over past elections, though considering
    what observers said, it did not fully meet international standards.

    "Basically, we do congratulate the Armenian people on their
    parliamentary elections and share with the international observers
    who were present the view that the election infrastructure has been
    greatly improved and that this is a step in the right direction
    towards meeting international standards."

    The news agency Mediamax reported that Tom Casey said in a briefing in
    Washington that they "do hope, however, that the Government of Armenia
    will aggressively investigate allegations that are there of electoral
    wrongdoing and prosecute people in accordance with Armenian law."

    In the meantime, a few Armenian NGOs made a statement on "bitter
    disappointment with the election campaign and the voting."

    Avetik Ishkhanyan, the chair of Helsinki Committee Armenia, said the "
    principle of change of government through elections works theoretically
    in Armenia."

    According to him, "the European observers observed only the nice
    coating of what the government offered to them."

    The statement was signed by the Open Society Fund Armenia, the Asparez
    Club of journalists, Yerevan Press Club, Transparency International
    Armenia, the Team Center for Surveys, Internews and others.

    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X