Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Armenian Weekly; Nov. 3, 2007; Commentary and Analysis

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Armenian Weekly; Nov. 3, 2007; Commentary and Analysis

    The Armenian Weekly On-Line
    80 Bigelow Avenue
    Watertown MA 02472 USA
    (617) 926-3974
    [email protected]
    http://www.ar menianweekly.com

    The Armenian Weekly; Volume 73, No. 44; Nov. 3, 2007

    Commentary and Analysis:

    1. Armenian Day Schools:
    Some Random Thoughts About a Not So Random Subject
    By Vartan Matiossian

    2. The Armenian Language and the Armenian School
    By Ardemis Mgrditchian

    3. 106-The New Front
    By Garen Yegparian

    4. Kordz Ooneenk Hayastan
    By Tom Vartabedian

    5. Letters to the Editor

    ***

    1. Armenian Day Schools:
    Some Random Thoughts About a Not So Random Subject
    By Vartan Matiossian

    One can safely assume that the number of students in Armenian day and
    Saturday schools throughout the Eastern U.S. is smaller than that of Sunday
    school students. While we look forward to seeing a statistical update in the
    future, let us take this assumption as a starting point to address briefly
    an old debate in the Armenian-American community: What is the main source of
    Armenian identity in this community?
    If you have a couple of generations here, it is likely that you will say the
    "Church"; if you were born overseas (specifically, the Middle East), your
    answer might be the "school," although none of these have to be taken as
    absolute truths.
    Granted, language and religion are far from being the only elements that
    function as shaping forces of Armenian identity. We will discuss them just
    for the sake of the arguments put forward below.
    While Armenian identity cannot, or should not, rely anymore on a simplistic,
    ideologically tainted definition of an Armenian as "someone who knows the
    language," any truly Armenian-oriented perspective of community survival
    cannot rule out language as an essential marker. (Disclosure: the expression
    "Armenian-oriented" is far from advocating any narrow-minded, exclusivist or
    nationalist viewpoint.)
    If we agree that neither language nor religion can be regarded as defining
    "Armenianness," we must nevertheless agree that out of the two, the first
    one is the only one able to ensure cultural transmission to the extent that
    the past, present and future can be effectively linked. It was first the
    language and then the Church. Suffice it to remember that the latter had to
    make recourse to the former in the fifth century to translate the Bible and
    effectively evangelize people.
    In an increasingly secularized world where distinctions in mainstream
    Christianity are slowly becoming irrelevant, the thought of religion as a
    major shaping force of Armenian identity in the absence of language does not
    withstand serious scrutiny. The Jewish case, where religion was the flagship
    of survival rather than language for a diasporan society (the long-dead
    Hebrew language was resurrected shortly after Jews started to settle in
    Palestine in the early 20th century), is not a valid example for obvious
    reasons.
    Non-Armenian speaking subcommunities in the past and present diaspora have
    been able to maintain a certain degree of symbolic ethnicity because of the
    presence of Armenian-speakers or at least some semblance of an Armenian
    language. Even ritualized expressions of language such as church ceremonies
    held in Armenian played a role in the survival of Armenian ethnicity in
    Poland long after the forced conversion to Catholicism and subsequent
    assimilation of that community in the 17th to 18th centuries and to this
    day. If one day the Armenian Church becomes a fully English-speaking
    denomination in America, it would also become gradually irrelevant to its
    flock from an ethnic viewpoint. In the long term, the distinct profile of
    the Armenian Church will be indifferent to the layman who goes to church for
    spiritual solace, regardless of the denomination.
    This brings us full circle to our main contention. The survival of language
    and religion as benchmarks of Armenian identity (we are not excluding
    Armenian Catholics or Protestants from this statement) can only be enforced
    by a process of transmission which does not stop in a few buzzwords or
    catchphrases peppered into English as some relic from the Old World.
    Hayeren khoseh! "Speak Armenian!" You have had some elder person at home
    lash these two words at you until you came back to your senses and started
    to utter some more or less intelligible Armenian phrases. This is one of the
    many widespread myths among us -that listening to someone's forceful speech
    contributes to the survival of the language. However, languages spoken in an
    increasingly narrow context are not able to function as they should, that
    is, as a reflection of the culture they carry. Rather, they function as what
    they have become, a reflection of the society that use them.
    These languages become a "kitchen language," only bound to go on a downward
    spiral inasmuch as its users make no conscientious effort to enrich it or
    improve its quality. They willfully downgrade a "living" language (pun
    intended), such as Armenian, into a "kitchen" language.
    A parent who sends his or her child to an Armenian day school and then pulls
    the child out in kindergarten or at some point in elementary school because
    "he has already learned enough Armenian" is delusional, to put it mildly.
    "Enough" for what? For daily use in the kitchen?
    If that kindergartener or elementary school student grows up in a family
    where Armenian is the language for daily communication at home; where the
    maddening crisscrossing of English and Armenian (and perhaps even Turkish)
    is absent, and instead only one language is spoken at a time; where by high
    school he is able to speak, write and read at a level comparable to English;
    where he is instilled with interest for reading and writing as a vehicle of
    natural expression, then one would have nothing to argue about such a
    choice.
    But how many such children do you know?
    Instead, we usually come across a gallery of proud Armenians who are
    frequent churchgoers, active participants in community affairs, perhaps avid
    readers of Armenian-related books and anxious followers of current events,
    but who are unable to speak the language except in some kind of farfetched
    jargon, and are willing to donate (e.g. "dump") the books from their father
    or grandfather to some Armenian institution, just because they are unable to
    read and write the language, or they have gone past the aip, pen, kim (which
    they may have as a decoration somewhere in their home).
    In the same way as their command of the language is broken, the chain of
    cultural transmission eventually becomes broken.
    Do you know any other vehicle outside an Armenian day school to make sure
    the chain of culture remains unbroken?

    Dr. Vartan Matiossian is a scholar in Armenian history and literature with a
    remarkable list of publications in Armenian, English and Spanish. He lives
    in New Jersey and works at the Hovnanian School.
    ------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------

    2. The Armenian Language and the Armenian School
    By Ardemis Mgrditchian

    The main factor in raising a generation of Armenian speakers is the Armenian
    family, while the role of the Armenian school is to build up on the
    foundations and guide pupils on the path of an Armenian education - a role
    which ensures the survival of the Armenian language.
    The complementary roles of the Armenian family and the Armenian school
    outlined above are only ideals, and that ideal does not exist anymore in the
    United States, especially on the East Coast. The situation makes us thing of
    the eternal question - which one came first, the chicken or the egg? In
    other words, the question is whether the use of the Armenian language by
    Armenians has declined due to the lack of schools, or whether Armenian
    schools have declined due to a decreased use of the language. Regadless of
    what the answer is, one thing is clear-a lack of Armenian schools speeds up
    the decline of the language, especially in an environment where our children
    use English in every aspect of their lives. And due to this overall
    situation, the role of the Armenian school in the Eastern Region of the US
    is inherently different than its role in other communities. The main
    priority of Armenian schools on the East Coast is the issue of keeping the
    Armenianl language alive, on top of which they must ensure an good overall
    Armenian education, which would include Armenian literature, culture, and
    history lessons.
    We must confess that the resources we have on the East Coast are simply no
    match for the enormity of the challenges we face. Most of the weight has
    been placed on the shoulders of a network of Saturday schools and a few
    daily schools that have limited resources. The situation looks even dimmer
    when we factor in the fact that even the costs of these schools that offer
    limited resources are not within the reach of the average Armenian family.
    Aside the fact that Saturday schools simply cannot meet the expectations set
    to them, they are also not very pleasing for teenage students, who view the
    trip to the Saturday school as an obligation that cuts into their weekend
    leisure time.
    It is unfortunate that our recources are this limited. But then, how can we
    confront the issue of language?
    1- The Armenian family must not spare any efforts to keep the linguistic
    tradition alive. Speaking English is not a sign of intelligence, and not
    speaking English is not a sign of ignorance.
    2- In Armenian schools, aside from the Armenian language classes, efforts
    should be made to ensure that teachers of other subjects are also Armenian
    speakers, which would show the students that Armenian is not just secondary,
    but it is an ever present means of communication.
    3- Schools that only have classes up to the 5th or 6th grade level should
    strive to have higher grade classes soon, since that would help the students
    spend essential years in language-building in an Armenian environment.
    4- Trips to Armenia organized by the schools greatly help in instilling a
    love for the Armenian language in students.
    5-After the students graduate from day school, they should be urged to
    attend Saturday school to continuity Armenian education.
    Thus, the issue of education on the East Coast cannot be resolved just by
    the efforts of institutions, but require collective efforts by the family,
    the school, organizations and other institutions.

    Ardemis Mgrditchian is an Armenian schoolteacher, who has taught in Armenian
    schools in Aleppo and Cairo. She currently teachers at the St. Stephen's
    Daily and Saturday schools in Boston.
    ------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------

    106-The New Front
    By Garen Yegparian

    Read this column in the following context. Shortly after I wrote it, but
    before sending it in, I received word that the sponsors of H.Res.106 were
    delaying bringing it to a vote. All this does is change the timing of our
    efforts, not the substance. In fact, it gives us time to do the very things
    I recommend below. Nor does the concluding paragraph require amendment.

    ***

    I think we might all be getting a sense of what it must've been like being
    subjected to a torture device favored by the late Shah's SAVAK (secret
    police). Evidently, it was a head-enveloping helmet that caused the victim's
    screams to echo, thus "enhancing" the suffering.

    The American media is the helmet. The screams are "It'll never pass," "106's
    supporters are jumping ship," "Give up, it's hopeless." In particular, the
    right wingnut radio and TV operation has been engaged to beat us and the
    resolution's congressional supporters down. No less an "eminence" than Rush
    Limbaugh weighed in with his bulk and blather. Fox News was going against us
    full force. Not that the remainder of the media was much better, but at
    least they weren't caustic in their criticism.

    The ironic result is that we might actually benefit. Some 5,000 articles
    have appeared about the resolution in the run-up to the committee vote and
    since. That's a lot of genocide awareness being created. I'd bet we didn't
    get this much exposure while our ancestors were being killed off by the
    Turks. Very little of this coverage questions the verity of the genocide,
    just the timing of the resolution relative to the Iraq war effort's need for
    Turkish land and air space.

    Once again, we should thank the Turkish government for helping us do our job
    by spending their millions and using up chits with their U.S. minions.

    BUT, this doesn't mean the news is all good. We must counteract this media
    attack or our efforts on the political front will be damaged. In fact,
    according to one of our media operatives, that's EXACTLY the strategy our
    opponents have adopted. They've opened up a new front where they know we're
    not as strong. They saw they were losing politically-we had the votes-so
    they shifted to the media echo/torture chamber.

    What are we to do? While still calling members of the House of
    Representatives, we must also start pressuring the media. Before going on,
    let me tell a VERY illuminating story from the days when the (Azeri) Turks
    were massacring us in Baku.

    At the time, I was the ANC-Western Region executive director. Coverage by
    the LA Times had been undesirable. I called to pursue improvement and spoke
    to Simon Li, then the foreign desk editor. He agreed to meet with us. We
    were all pleasantly surprised. But what is most telling about this incident
    is what he said to us. He asked if we knew why he agreed to meet with us. Of
    course we did not. He told us my call was the first where the caller was
    calm and rational.

    The moral of the story is clear. Good cop, bad cop. Any time you see bad
    coverage, start calling the outlet-newspaper, radio or television station,
    blog-in question. Get your friends, relatives and neighbors to call. Drive
    them nuts. Here, if you use e-mail or snail mail, it's good. But MUCH better
    is the personal impact of a call. Think of how easy it is to ignore
    text-electronic or ink-versus someone screaming in your ear. But be sure to
    let your local or regional ANC know. You're creating the entry. Then let
    someone who's media savvy go in. You can go to the various ANC websites
    (especially the ANCAs that promptly reports developments), or call the
    regional offices for local references-the Eastern Region at (617) 926-3974,
    the Western Region at (818) 500-1918.

    In your calls or other contact, hit them with facts, press them for
    corrections, demand space for op-ed pieces that tell our side of the
    resolution story-not the Turkish/Administration/defense lobby's spin and
    lies. The resolution has more co-sponsors, even now, than 90% of the bills
    in Congress, and, at its peak, barely a handful had more. Speaker of the
    House Nancy Pelosi is still committed to bringing the resolution to a
    vote-when has she ever said otherwise? Turkey, no one else, is endangering
    the lives of American soldiers by threatening to close its transport routes.
    Turkey is threatening to destabilize the entire Middle East by invading
    Iraqi-Kurdistan. Why should American values and history (going back to the
    relief provided in the immediate aftermath of the genocide) be sacrificed so
    Turkey can continue its denial? Who else but a guilty party would go to such
    extremes to avert passage of an otherwise minor piece of legislation?

    We're winning. Now would be a very bad time to give up. Pick up another
    battering ram, and this time, go for the media.
    ------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------

    2. Kordz Ooneenk Hayastan
    By Tom Vartabedian


    I have always been fond of adages. For lack of a better saying in my high
    school yearbook, I came up with this proverb: "A little man can do big
    things."

    Being only 5'7", I sought out a place for the Davids of our society. Being
    small was no reason not to slay a Goliath, I figured. Use your size to your
    best advantage, whether it was sports or industry.

    My grandmother had one that carries to this present day. Whenever things got
    tough, she would grind her teeth, clinch her fists and utter, "Kordz ooneenk
    Hayastan."

    The inference meaning, "We have work, Armenia."

    Now, it didn't matter what the task was. It could have been the day's wash,
    a holiday meal, a project at church or some family issue.

    She drew upon her beloved Armenia for inspiration. I do not know its
    derivation, whether she got that from her parents or it just came naturally
    when she saw her village of Kharpet devastated by the Ottoman Turks.

    The work never stopped.

    It continued pretty much through my adolescence and early adult life. A day
    or week didn't go by when there wasn't some occasion for these words,
    including the time I ruffled her feathers by playing hooky from Armenian
    school.

    "You want to bury our language," she would say in broken English. "Kordz
    ooneenk Hayastan."

    She carried those words to her grave many years later and I thought they
    were buried for good when I dated my first "odar" girlfriend, much to the
    dissent of my mother who was from the same school of thought.

    I overheard her one day telling my father, "Kordz ooneenk Hayastan." Dad was
    more of the reticent sort. He never came right out and said it but he might
    have been thinking in my favor, "If Armenia has work, let Armenia do it."

    My mother was a chip off her mother's block. More and more, the platitudes
    gushed forth, whether it was a low grade on my report card, the time I nixed
    Holy Mass at the Armenian Church to go gallivanting in Boston, or balking to
    support the family restaurant business.

    The fact I turned out to be somewhat active in Armenian circles can directly
    be attributed to my mom and not my dad. There were enough "Hayastans" in her
    vernacular to start her own country.

    You know the old saying. If an epigram is repeated often enough, it becomes
    the truth. And more often than not, they can solve an international crisis.
    Throughout the course of history, they have been uttered and muttered by the
    most venerable of statesmen in every language conceivable.

    I wonder how many others resorted to the same quip as my grandmother and
    mother. Well, let me tell you, some of it may have rubbed off on me.

    Whenever my own children go against my ethnic grain by patronizing some
    American venue other than their own, I catch myself saying, "Kordz ooneenk
    Hayastan."

    Perhaps I'm exaggerating the point, but I look to Armenia for sustenance and
    wish a lot of other folks would, too. I look upon Mayr Hayastan as somewhat
    of a matron saint to lead our people out of bondage and into a world far
    more agreeable.

    Could it be that three generations are sharing the same pearl of wisdom?
    That those three simple words are linking the past to the present and
    changing lives?

    What may have started out as a wisecrack 60 years ago has now turned into a
    rough diamond of sorts. Its sparkle has come from constant polishing.
    Through it all it has evolved a ton of wit and wisdom.

    I have three children, all raised inside an Armenian home. I doubt if any of
    them will ever utter those words, much less their children.

    Has the work of Armenia finally ended? Not as long as I'm still alive.

    My oldest daughter married twice in the Armenian Church and except for a
    rare visit at Christmas and Easter, seldom finds the time to attend.

    Each of the two boys have temporarily removed themselves from their
    ethnicity and are gallantly pursuing the American Dream. I constantly lobby
    for equal time.

    Join an Armenian church near your home. Take in a Boston concert or lecture.
    Be part of an April 24th commemoration. Join the committee. Don't forget
    your roots.

    I can only dip back into my ancestry and come up with the words my mother
    and grandmother often quipped.

    I grind my teeth, clinch my fist and utter, "Kordz ooneenk Hayastan!"
    ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------------

    3. Letters to the Editor


    Dear Editor,

    I enjoy your paper and wish you and your staff continued success. I would
    like to comment on the recent discussion over the Armenian Genocide Museum
    in Washington. Why spend millions for a museum in Washington, D.C., when in
    Armenia, hospitals, schools and factories need money desperately?

    Takouhy Bedrossian
    New York

    ***
    Dear Editor,

    My name is George Alfred Kouchakji. My father was born in Aleppo, and went
    to an orphanage in Jerusalem after the death of his father in the beginning
    of the 20th century. Our family belongs to the Armenian Catholic Church. I
    believe that our origin was in Armenia, although our name does not end in
    "ian." I am interested in tracking down the origin of my family as far back
    as possible. I have just found the name "Kouchakjian," belonging to the
    Armenian community in the U.S. Is there somebody in the Armenian community
    there who can help me with relevant information about my origin? Any help
    will be much appreciated.


    Kind regards,

    George Alfred Kouchakji
    Switzerland
Working...
X