Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Harman wobbles on genocide

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Harman wobbles on genocide

    Harman wobbles on genocide

    After co-sponsoring the Armenian genocide resolution, the Westside
    congresswoman now opposes it.

    October 10, 2007

    Rep. Jane Harman (D-Venice) is absolutely right: U.S. foreign policy
    should reflect "appropriate understanding and sensitivity concerning
    issues related to human rights, ethnic cleansing and genocide."
    Further, the president should indeed "accurately characterize the
    systematic and deliberate annihilation of 1,500,000 Armenians as
    genocide." That's why Harman is one of more than 220 members of the
    House to co-sponsor a worthwhile, nonbinding resolution containing
    precisely that language.

    Harman is right about something else as well: Turkey is an invaluable
    NATO ally and strategic partner in the always combustible Middle East.
    It is arguably the most important friend both the U.S. and Israel have
    in the Muslim world, and the most reliable country on Iraq's border.
    Ankara's ongoing modernization and painstaking integration with Europe
    provide a crucial example to the largely misgoverned Muslim world:
    that a secular state can be the path to prosperity, not hell.

    These two sets of facts, being factual, are not in conflict. Nor
    should they have anything to do with one another. Yet the government
    of modern Turkey has invested enormous diplomatic capital and cash in
    denying the genocide committed by its forebears and warning weak-kneed
    U.S. politicians -- from President Bush on down -- that a symbolic
    vote to call the events of nine decades ago by their proper name will
    create, in the words of Turkish President Abdullah Gul this week,
    "serious troubles" for U.S. diplomacy.

    The latest American to go wobbly is none other than the usually
    steely-eyed congresswoman from L.A.'s Westside. Last week, Harman sent
    a letter to Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Tom Lantos
    (D-Burlingame) urging him to withdraw from consideration the very bill
    that contains her signature. "Following a visit to Turkey earlier this
    year," she wrote, "I have great concern that this is the wrong time
    for the Congress to consider this measure. . . . We should avoid
    taking steps that would embarrass or isolate the Turkish leadership."
    The bill is scheduled for a committee vote today; should it pass and
    reach the House floor, Harman intends to vote no.

    Harman herself is not shy about using the word genocide, and defends
    her flip-flop on grounds of exercising foreign policy "realism" while
    hoping for eventual reconciliation between Turkey and the descendants
    of those who were slaughtered. But "realism" is not respected by
    denying reality, and friendship is best expressed through honesty, not
    the indulgence of irrational threats.

    Legislators like to congratulate themselves when they call evil by its
    proper name. But the real mark of courage is speaking truth when it's
    inconvenient. The Foreign Relations Committee should pass the
    recognition resolution, and Washington should rediscover the basic
    fortitude to say officially what history knows to be true.

    Source: http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/ la-ed-genocide10oct10,1,4246376.story?ctrack=2&amp ;cset=true
Working...
X