Tweet
AT IT AGAIN
By Jay Burr Posted in Liberals
Red State
http://www.redstate.com/blogs/jay_burr/2007/oct/1 0/at_it_again
Oct 11 2007
Who defines the fine line between being the opposition party and
being unpatriotic?
To debate what we are doing is one thing, but to continually make
efforts to thwart success for our men and women in the military,
and in turn America, is something else entirely.
Democrats on the Hill have once again taken steps to handicap our
efforts in the Middle East and the War of Terror. The Armenian Genocide
vote that took place today is another, in the line of many, not even
subtle attempts to restrict our war efforts and bring victory to the
same people who want to kill us.
Of all of the pressing issues facing our nation that Congress
should act on, Democrats chose today to go against the wishes of our
President, Secretary of State and Secretary of Defense by defining
deaths from almost 100 years ago as genocide.
In truth, I don't believe they even care about the Armenian people
or historical accuracy, they just found another backdoor way to hurt
our war efforts and at the same time tell the President to kiss off.
Despite the warnings of a backlash from one of our staunchest war
allies, the Democrats chose to turn their collective noses up in
their typical up yours tone to the President and do it anyway.
Do liberals have to actually go in the field and take the life of one
of our soldiers for the American people to realize they don't care
whether we win or lose, as long as they can score political points
and make it more difficult for a President they had already decided
to hate seven years ago?
When has history defined a patriot as someone who wishes their own
country, in the course of fighting a just fight, to lose?
Last question, if you had the definition of a patriot and the
definition of a traitor sitting right in front of you, what column
would you put the Democrats in?
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
By Jay Burr Posted in Liberals
Red State
http://www.redstate.com/blogs/jay_burr/2007/oct/1 0/at_it_again
Oct 11 2007
Who defines the fine line between being the opposition party and
being unpatriotic?
To debate what we are doing is one thing, but to continually make
efforts to thwart success for our men and women in the military,
and in turn America, is something else entirely.
Democrats on the Hill have once again taken steps to handicap our
efforts in the Middle East and the War of Terror. The Armenian Genocide
vote that took place today is another, in the line of many, not even
subtle attempts to restrict our war efforts and bring victory to the
same people who want to kill us.
Of all of the pressing issues facing our nation that Congress
should act on, Democrats chose today to go against the wishes of our
President, Secretary of State and Secretary of Defense by defining
deaths from almost 100 years ago as genocide.
In truth, I don't believe they even care about the Armenian people
or historical accuracy, they just found another backdoor way to hurt
our war efforts and at the same time tell the President to kiss off.
Despite the warnings of a backlash from one of our staunchest war
allies, the Democrats chose to turn their collective noses up in
their typical up yours tone to the President and do it anyway.
Do liberals have to actually go in the field and take the life of one
of our soldiers for the American people to realize they don't care
whether we win or lose, as long as they can score political points
and make it more difficult for a President they had already decided
to hate seven years ago?
When has history defined a patriot as someone who wishes their own
country, in the course of fighting a just fight, to lose?
Last question, if you had the definition of a patriot and the
definition of a traitor sitting right in front of you, what column
would you put the Democrats in?
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress