Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NYT again omitted Bush's 2000 pledge to "properly recognize[]"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • NYT again omitted Bush's 2000 pledge to "properly recognize[]"

    Media Matters for America, DC
    Oct 13 2007


    NY Times again omitted Bush's 2000 pledge to "properly recognize[]"
    "genocidal campaign" against Armenians


    Summary: An October 12 New York Times article about a House of
    Representatives resolution labeling the killing of Armenians by the
    Ottoman Empire from 1915-1923 as genocide reported that the Bush
    administration opposed the resolution. However, the article did not
    mention that as a presidential candidate in 2000, Bush sent a letter
    to the Armenian National Committee of America, in which, according to
    a press release on the organization's website, he wrote that "[t]he
    Armenians were subjected to a genocidal campaign that defies
    comprehension" and that if elected president, he "would ensure that
    our nation properly recognizes the tragic suffering of the Armenian
    people." An October 11 Times article also did not mention the letter.


    An October 12 New York Times article about the resolution approved by
    the House Foreign Affairs Committee on October 10 -- labeling the
    killing of Armenians by the Ottoman Empire from 1915-1923 as genocide
    -- reported that the Bush administration opposed the resolution
    without mentioning that as a presidential candidate in 2000, Bush
    sent a letter to the Armenian National Committee of America, in
    which, according to a press release on the organization's website, he
    wrote that "[t]he Armenians were subjected to a genocidal campaign
    that defies comprehension." According to the excerpt of the letter
    posted on the website, Bush also said that if elected president, he
    "would ensure that our nation properly recognizes the tragic
    suffering of the Armenian people," as Media Matters for America
    documented. The New York Times also did not mention Bush's pledge in
    an October 11 article about Bush's objection to the House committee's
    resolution. Similarly, two separate reports on the October 11 edition
    of CNN's The Situation Room noted the administration's objections to
    the resolution without mentioning Bush's reported promise in 2000 to
    "properly recognize[]" the Armenian people's "tragic suffering."
    During the 5 p.m. ET hour of The Situation Room on October 10, CNN
    senior Pentagon correspondent Jamie McIntyre noted:

    At issue, a House resolution labeling the killings of hundreds of
    thousands of Armenians by Ottoman Turks during World War I genocide.

    President Bush used that word himself as a candidate back in 2000,
    but says now the timing couldn't be worse.

    McIntyre did not note Bush's 2000 pledge, and CNN has not mentioned
    the fact that Bush had previously used the term "genocidal campaign"
    to describe the Ottoman Empire's treatment of the Armenians since
    McIntyre's report on the October 10 edition of The Situation Room.

    In an October 10 statement, Bush urged members of the House "to
    oppose the Armenian genocide resolution":

    On another issue before Congress, I urge members to oppose the
    Armenian genocide resolution now being considered by the House
    Foreign Affairs Committee. We all deeply regret the tragic suffering
    of the Armenian people that began in 1915. This resolution is not the
    right response to these historic mass killings, and its passage would
    do great harm to our relations with a key ally in NATO and in the
    global war on terror.

    >From the October 12 New York Times article:

    The committee vote in the House, though nonbinding and largely
    symbolic, rebuffed an intense campaign by the White House and earlier
    warnings from Turkey's government that such a vote would gravely
    strain relations with the United States.

    In Washington, the Bush administration tried to ease the hard
    feelings between the countries, and vowed to try to defeat the
    resolution on Capitol Hill.

    "One of the reasons we opposed the resolution in the House yesterday
    is that the president has expressed on behalf of the American people
    our horror at the tragedy of 1915," said Dana Perino, President
    Bush's chief spokeswoman. "But at the same time, we have national
    security concerns, and many of our troops and supplies go through
    Turkey. They are a very important ally in the war on terror, and we
    are going to continue to try to work with them. And we hope that the
    House does not put forward a full vote."

    [...]

    For his part, Ross Wilson, the United States ambassador to Turkey,
    also tried to calm relations, issuing a statement on Thursday saying
    that the partnership between Turkey and the United States was strong
    and would remain so. He added that he, President Bush and Secretary
    of State Condoleezza Rice regretted the committee decision.

    During the 4 p.m. ET hour of The Situation Room, anchor Wolf Blitzer
    stated that "the Bush administration is warning of some major
    consequences, ramifications, if the full House moves forward with
    this legislation." In the 5 p.m. ET hour of the program, CNN State
    Department correspondent Zain Verjee reported that Rice will be "be
    reaching out to top House leaders, trying to convince them not to let
    the resolution go through in the full House." Neither Blitzer nor
    Verjee mentioned the pledge Bush reportedly made in 2000.

    According to the Armenian National Committee of America's press
    release, Bush called the Turkish killing of Armenians a "genocidal
    campaign" and vowed that the United States would "properly
    recognize[]" the event. The blog Think Progress highlighted the press
    release on October 10. Despite his pledge as a candidate to "ensure"
    this recognition, as president, Bush does not appear to have used the
    term "genocide" -- or a variant thereof -- to describe the killings,
    according to a search of the White House website. From the "partial
    text" of Bush's letter on the Armenian National Committee of America
    website:

    The twentieth century was marred by wars of unimaginable brutality,
    mass murder and genocide. History records that the Armenians were the
    first people of the last century to have endured these cruelties. The
    Armenians were subjected to a genocidal campaign that defies
    comprehension and commands all decent people to remember and
    acknowledge the facts and lessons of an awful crime in a century of
    bloody crimes against humanity. If elected President, I would ensure
    that our nation properly recognizes the tragic suffering of the
    Armenian people.

    >From the 4 p.m. ET hour of CNN's The Situation Room on October 11:

    BLITZER: Turkey recalling its ambassador to the United States. The
    announcement coming after a House panel approved a bill describing
    mass killings of Armenians during World War I as genocide.

    Our congressional correspondent Dana Bash is on the Hill. She's
    watching this story for us.

    Dana, the Bush administration is warning of some major consequences,
    ramifications, if the full House moves forward with this legislation.

    BASH: They sure are, Wolf. But you know, a small but very vocal
    Armenian-American community, they have been lobbying Congress for
    decades to call the mass killings actually genocide.

    In the past, congressional leaders simply have not voted for it
    because of that kind of pressure from the Turks and from presidents,
    Democrats and Republicans, and the intense lobbying from high-powered
    lobbyists that the Turks hired in order to do that. But that pressure
    is not swaying the Democratic leaders now running Congress.

    [begin video clip]

    BASH: Mass killings of Armenians by the Turks took place nearly a
    century ago. So why is the House moving to label it genocide now?

    HOUSE SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI (D-CA): Because now -- there's never a
    good time. And all of us in the Democratic leadership have supported
    -- are making -- reiterating Americans' acknowledgement of a
    genocide.

    BASH: Defiant Democratic leaders say they view this as part of their
    mandate, restoring America's moral authority around the world.

    REP. TOM LANTOS (D-CA): When the Turkish government says there was no
    genocide of Armenians, we have to set them straight.

    BASH: For Foreign Affairs chairman Tom Lantos, fighting for human
    rights is personal.

    BASH: You escaped two labor camps in Hungary?

    LANTOS: Yes, yes.

    BASH: And you were how old?

    LANTOS: Well, by that time, I was 16.

    BASH: He is the only Holocaust survivor in Congress.

    LANTOS: I feel that I have a tremendous opportunity as a survivor of
    the Holocaust to bring a moral dimension to our foreign policy.

    BASH: Lantos pushed the symbolic resolution calling Armenian killings
    genocide despite intense pressure against it from the Bush
    administration. He dismisses Turkish warnings this could jeopardize
    U.S. relations with Turkey, a critical Mideast ally that insists the
    Armenian deaths were not genocide.

    BASH: What if it says, "You're not going to be able to use our air
    space anymore," or, "You're not going to be able to use our country
    to get critical supplies to the men and women who are fighting in
    Iraq"?

    LANTOS: Well, with all due respect to the Turkish government, the
    Turkish-American relationship is infinitely more valuable to Turkey
    than it is to the United States. The Turkish government will not act
    against the United States because that would be against their own
    interests. I'm convinced of this.

    [end video clip]

    BASH: But the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee
    disagrees, and that Democratic chairman, Ike Skelton [D-MO], Wolf,
    wrote this letter to the speaker, Nancy Pelosi, which CNN has
    obtained. And in it, he warns that the Armenian resolution could
    actually hinder the Democrats' chief goal in this Congress, and that
    is bringing troops home from Iraq. He says that is because Turkey, of
    course, is a key transfer port -- point, I should say, for getting
    troops home from Iraq.

    BLITZER: Dana Bash on the Hill for us. Thanks, Dana, very much.

    >From the 5 p.m. ET hour of The Situation Room on October 11:

    BLITZER: A strong reaction from Turkey right now. The Turkish
    government pulling its ambassador from the United States. That after
    a House committee passed a resolution saying Turkey committed
    genocide in World War I against Armenians.

    Our State Department correspondent, Zain Verjee, is following this
    story for us, and it's escalating literally by the hour, Zain. What's
    going on?

    VERJEE: It is, Wolf. Here at the State Department, officials are
    doing a lot of damage control. The big worry here today at the State
    Department is that could Turkey turn from a friend into an enemy.

    [begin video clip]

    VERJEE: Turks take to the streets, tired of supporting the U.S. and
    having little to show for it. Turkish officials say they just don't
    trust the U.S., which they thought was their closest ally. They feel
    betrayed by a congressional committee vote calling the killing of
    Armenians by Turks in World War I genocide. Turkey warned of
    consequences, and now it's making good on its threat, recalling its
    ambassador the U.S. for consultations.

    TOM CASEY (State Department spokesman): That is their decision. I
    think that it certainly will not do anything to limit our efforts to
    continue on reach out to Turkish officials.

    VERJEE: Turkey is threatening more action if the resolution passes
    the full House.

    EGEMAN BAGIS (foreign policy adviser to Turkish prime minister):
    Despite our warnings, U.S. Congress wanted to play hardball. We now
    have to play hardball, as well.

    VERJEE: Like cutting off its air space to the U.S. military, like it
    did with France and Canada, who passed similar measures. It could
    also end access to Incirlik Air Base, which the U.S. military uses to
    transport critical cargo and fuel supplies to Iraq.

    RICE: The passage of this resolution at this time would, indeed, be
    very problematic for everything that we are trying to do in the
    Middle East.

    VERJEE: And might open a dangerous new front in the Iraq war. Turkey
    wants to destroy Kurdish rebels, called the PKK, that have launched
    cross-border attacks from northern Iraq, killing Turks.

    BAGIS: PKK for us is what Al Qaeda is to you.

    VERJEE: And Turkish officials say if the U.S. won't go after the PKK,
    Turkey will. Turkish helicopters crossed into Iraqi airspace
    Thursday, and troops are dangerously poised along the border.

    [end video clip]

    VERJEE: And secretary of state, Wolf, Condoleezza Rice is reaching
    out to the top Turkish leadership, trying to assure them that the
    U.S. is a strong friend and a very good ally and that Turkey is
    important to the U.S. She's also going to be reaching out to top
    House leaders, trying to convince them not to let the resolution go
    through in the full House. Wolf.

    BLITZER: Zain, lots at stake right now.

    >From the 5 p.m. ET hour of The Situation Room on October 10:

    BLITZER: The Bush administration right now is in a tense standoff
    with Congress over a resolution that would pin the genocide label on
    Turkey for mass killings carried out during the First World War. The
    White House and military commanders are deeply worried about the
    impact on the current war in Iraq by what's happening in the House of
    Representatives right now.

    Let's go to live to our senior Pentagon correspondent, Jamie
    McIntyre. He's watching this story. Why is the Pentagon, in
    particular, Jamie, so concerned?

    McINTYRE: Well, it's coming at a really bad time. Turkey sent
    warplanes and attack helicopters into northern Iraq today to pound
    Kurdish rebel positions, a possible prelude to an incursion. The U.S.
    is urging restraint on Turkey, and, at the same time, the Bush
    administration is accusing Congress of making things worse.

    [begin video clip]

    PELOSI: The House will be in order.

    McINTYRE: As if to underscore her defiance of the Bush
    administration, Speaker Nancy Pelosi gaveled the House to order with
    a prayer by an Armenian chaplain.

    CATHOLICOS KAREKIN II (Armenian Apostolic Church): With a solemn
    burden of history, we remember the victims of the genocide of the
    Armenians.

    McINTYRE: That historical note has become a testy confrontation with
    the White House. At issue, a House resolution labeling the killings
    of hundreds of thousands of Armenians by Ottoman Turks during World
    War I genocide.

    President Bush used that word himself as a candidate back in 2000,
    but says now the timing couldn't be worse.

    BUSH: This resolution is not the right response to these historic
    mass killings, and its passage would do great harm to our relations
    with a key ally in NATO.

    McINTYRE: The Pentagon argues the resolution would anger Turkey and
    hamper the war effort in Iraq. Seventy percent of air cargo,
    including armored MRAP vehicles, as well as 30 percent of fuel, fly
    by way of the Incirlik Air Base in Turkey.

    - K.H.

    http://mediamatters.org/items/200710120011?f =h_latest
Working...
X