Tweet
Portland Press Herald, Maine
Oct 14 2007
Editorial
'Genocide' right name for Armenian deaths
The U.S. government cannot protect its NATO ally Turkey from the
judgment of history.
October 14, 2007
It's easy to find a reason not to mark Turkey with the brand of
genocide for the mass killings of 1.5 million Armenians during the
waning days of the Ottoman Empire.
Modern Turkey is an important ally, a moderate Muslim country with a
secular government in one of the most sensitive areas of the world.
It has a border with Iraq and its airspace and bases have been used
to supply our forces in that country.
The timing of a proposed House resolution condemning Turkish crimes
is bad. The crimes alleged were committed a lifetime ago, beginning
in 1915, 33 years before the term genocide was coined and defined in
international law.
The killers were agents of an ancient kingdom, long ago wiped off the
map. Why should Congress act now, when it is clearly upsetting to the
present Turkish government?
The answer is simple. We should call it genocide because that is the
truth.
Between 1915 and 1923, Ottoman officials engaged in a systematic
campaign to eliminate the Armenian minority from their homeland
inside Turkey using forced expulsions and massacres.
Although most of the historical questions are settled, the United
States has not officially described the Ottoman actions as genocide.
Resolutions to do just that have been introduced in the U.S. Congress
before, but were defeated because of Turkey's strategic role in the
Cold War. Again, the timing was bad.
The House Foreign Affairs Committee was right to pursue this issue
now. Given Turkey's place on the globe, there will probably never be
a good time.
If genocide is a charge that can only be applied to our enemies, it
loses all meaning. The United States must be willing, when
appropriate, to use it against its friends if our country is to
retain any moral authority in matters of international law.
Too often allegations of crimes against humanity are seen as the
price paid only by losers. The victors in war can keep their secrets,
and their atrocities go unpunished.
That creates a problem. What will restrain the actions of a country
that doesn't think it is going to end up on the losing side of a
conflict?
Turkey should not be able to use its strategic position to keep
hiding from its history. If international powers are going to prevent
a future genocide, everyone should be ready to look squarely at the
past.
http://pressherald.mainetoday.com/story.php?id=1 40241&ac=PHedi
Oct 14 2007
Editorial
'Genocide' right name for Armenian deaths
The U.S. government cannot protect its NATO ally Turkey from the
judgment of history.
October 14, 2007
It's easy to find a reason not to mark Turkey with the brand of
genocide for the mass killings of 1.5 million Armenians during the
waning days of the Ottoman Empire.
Modern Turkey is an important ally, a moderate Muslim country with a
secular government in one of the most sensitive areas of the world.
It has a border with Iraq and its airspace and bases have been used
to supply our forces in that country.
The timing of a proposed House resolution condemning Turkish crimes
is bad. The crimes alleged were committed a lifetime ago, beginning
in 1915, 33 years before the term genocide was coined and defined in
international law.
The killers were agents of an ancient kingdom, long ago wiped off the
map. Why should Congress act now, when it is clearly upsetting to the
present Turkish government?
The answer is simple. We should call it genocide because that is the
truth.
Between 1915 and 1923, Ottoman officials engaged in a systematic
campaign to eliminate the Armenian minority from their homeland
inside Turkey using forced expulsions and massacres.
Although most of the historical questions are settled, the United
States has not officially described the Ottoman actions as genocide.
Resolutions to do just that have been introduced in the U.S. Congress
before, but were defeated because of Turkey's strategic role in the
Cold War. Again, the timing was bad.
The House Foreign Affairs Committee was right to pursue this issue
now. Given Turkey's place on the globe, there will probably never be
a good time.
If genocide is a charge that can only be applied to our enemies, it
loses all meaning. The United States must be willing, when
appropriate, to use it against its friends if our country is to
retain any moral authority in matters of international law.
Too often allegations of crimes against humanity are seen as the
price paid only by losers. The victors in war can keep their secrets,
and their atrocities go unpunished.
That creates a problem. What will restrain the actions of a country
that doesn't think it is going to end up on the losing side of a
conflict?
Turkey should not be able to use its strategic position to keep
hiding from its history. If international powers are going to prevent
a future genocide, everyone should be ready to look squarely at the
past.
http://pressherald.mainetoday.com/story.php?id=1 40241&ac=PHedi