Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is America Ready For An Intelligent Leader?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Is America Ready For An Intelligent Leader?

    IS AMERICA READY FOR AN INTELLIGENT LEADER?
    By Robert Bridge

    Moscow News, Russia
    Oct 18 2007

    I am not exactly sure when the tradition began, but we Americans have
    a natural fondness for folksy, down-to-earth, unsophisticated men to
    lead us to wherever the hell we are going. Our commander-in-chief
    should be a man of the people, unpretentious, preferably male and
    chummy. We want to feel that it would be almost natural to toss back
    beers with him at the bar while discussing last night's college
    football game. A Ulysses S. Grant type of guy: whisky, whiskers,
    cigars, the full nine yards. A real man's man.

    Americans like straight talk, like the terse verse of a used-car
    salesmen, or a loaded John Wayne with the safety off. Unlike the
    loquacious Brits, our Atlantic cousins, Americans don't care to
    have their tongues twisted around a verbose vernacular. Oh, drat it
    tarnations, I'll just spit it out: Americans like stupid presidents.

    Yessir we do. Yee-haw! Why? Well, whenever our semi-literate
    politicians are forced to speak extemporaneously, they remind us that
    had we too been born rich and indifferent to our college grades, we too
    could have been blotching speeches at the podium during major summits.

    It seems that America's romance with power dolts began with the late
    Ronald Reagan (rest in peace, sir, together with America's national
    healthcare), the former Hollywood star who could smile and wave to a
    crowd in such a manner that the stock market would instantly rocket
    50 percent. Even the Soviets, not to mention the Berlin Wall, fell
    for Reagan's guffaw and silly Star-Wars-may-the force-be-with-you
    wisecracks.

    Reagan paved the way for a whole lineup of court jesters, starting
    with his vice president, George Herbert Walker Bush, whose Curriculum
    Vitae includes U.S. Intelligence Overlord (it's politically suspicious
    for Russian presidents to feature the underworld on their resume,
    you see, but perfectly alright if you are a righteous U.S.

    citizen), Skull and Bones secret society member, complete with secret
    handshake, secret initiation rites, and probably even secret decoder
    rings, and Delta Kappa Epsilon fraternity president.

    If anybody had any doubts what sort of future president H.W. would
    make, they were offered a peek preview when 'the Gipper' went under
    for an operation to have polyps removed from his posterior. Bush the
    Elder wasted no time jumping into the presidential briefs and spent
    his eight hours as the most powerful man on the planet returning
    volleys on the tennis court. Better than bombing some third world
    country for eight hours, I suppose.

    Although George H.W. Bush may not have been outwardly stupid per se,
    he was nevertheless detached from the American heartland to such
    a degree that during one disastrous photo op to a supermarket he
    expressed amazement that his cashier was employing laser technology
    against an innocent jar of Grey Poupon (My God, men, arrest these
    women, they're all armed!). Forget the economy; it's the hi-tech
    price checker, stupid!

    Moving right along and none too soon, America eventually got the
    president it deserved with William Jefferson Clinton. Slick Willy, the
    42nd president of the United States, who is said to be able to solve
    The New York Times Sunday Crossword with non-erasable ink when not
    engaged in other extracurricular affairs, was certainly not stupid. But
    just because you are not stupid does not necessarily mean that you are
    capable of making prudent decisions at regular intervals. After all,
    even the lowest breed of dog can learn cool tricks. And the one trick
    that Clinton mastered - besides how to hold a telephone conversation
    with the Senate while teaching a young female intern the ropes -
    was how to profess to being a Democrat ('New Democrat' to be exact)
    while behaving no better than a full-blown rabid Republican.

    It has been crudely estimated that in the eight years that Clinton
    played charades in the White House, he was only really a Democrat for
    the last 42.5 minutes of his reign. This is roughly the time it took
    for Wild Bill to ram through thousands of pages of before-the-buzzer
    legislation to protect 95 million acres of endangered wildlife,
    increase the minimum wage, pardon convicted cronies (on his last day
    in office, Clinton issued 141 pardons and 36 commutations) and bomb
    a Sudanese pill plant the day before a verdict was to be handed down
    regarding obstruction of justice charges in the Monica Lewinsky case.

    In the end, Clinton's last-minute moves only sparked a nasty reaction
    from the Republicans, who immediately reversed much of this legislation
    once they came to power. Can this sort of behavior be described as
    intelligent leadership? You be the judge.

    But the Clinton era, despite the liberal White House sleepovers and
    sleep arounds, seems like a Gilded Age when compared to what was
    hurling down the sewer pipe at 600 miles per hour.

    In 2000, the tectonic plates of U.S. politics suddenly shifted,
    the rainforests belched sulfur, and a whole new species of political
    carnivore known as Neoconservative S. Crewus acquired the ability to
    stand upright on two legs and even make speeches. As history and nasty
    fate would have it, these fine young cannibals, under the tortured
    leadership of George W. Bush, found themselves wielding the club of
    superpower on 9/11/2001. Since then, and never before in the history
    of politics - American or otherwise - has the world experienced a
    more blatant display of brutal and unreserved Stupidity. Indeed,
    the level of stupidity is so off-the-charts stupid that they can
    only be described as acts of premeditated stupidity, underwritten by
    America's supposed preference for stupid leaders.

    As for being gosh-golly-gee-did-I-destroy-another-village stupid,
    it is the perfect defense for unforgivably stupid political behavior.

    How can we admonish a man, after all, who has nothing more than the
    stupid pretensions of launching democracy into the Middle East from a
    stupid aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf? Gee whiz, he might have
    failed, but that's only because he is such an incredibly stupid guy.

    All is forgiven. Allah forgives you!

    A group of pimply teenagers in the basement of an Internet cafe in
    Akron, Ohio could have micro-managed the War on Terror with fewer
    mishaps than the Bush administration, which has violated every
    military mantra ever written. What is the surest way to create a more
    formidable enemy? Simple: Treat their prisoners of war as barbaric as
    possible. Been there, done that in the sensory-deprived no-man's land
    of Guantanamo Bay, the Abu Ghraib Summer Love-in, and the not-so-secret
    torture facilities in former Warsaw Bloc freedom pits.

    Bush's medieval motto: Torture only hurts if you are guilty.

    Today, vendettas only promise to worsen between the warring tribes
    now that it has been disclosed that corporate mercenaries on the
    ground in Iraq gunned down two Armenian Christian women in Baghdad.

    This comes on the heels of the Sept. 16 massacre in Baghdad's Nisour
    Square, where 17 Iraqis were killed by personnel from Blackwater USA,
    a trigger-happy security agency that already has a long bloody history
    of deadly screw-up's in Iraq.

    Stupid, stupid, stupid. And that is just the tip of the stupid iceberg
    in this stupid reign of error.

    Is there an intelligent leader on the horizon to restore America's
    basement-level standings? Personally, I believe the only man for the
    task is 'former president' Al Gore, as much as the man annoys me to
    tears. What if Gore had won the 2000 presidential elections... ?

    Well, the world will never know, and the historians have no patience
    for 'What if' scenarios. But it seems certain that had Gore been
    elected (oops, sorry, he was) the U.S. would not be losing its global
    standing, not to mention allies, by fighting yet another unwinnable
    and unnecessary war.

    Given Gore's recent nomination for a Nobel Peace Prize for fighting
    climate change, America could be leading the fight against the real
    enemy of global warming, instead of the shadow of an enemy of our
    own stupid design.

    Is America ready for an intelligent leader?
Working...
X