Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Indulgences For The Political Class

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Indulgences For The Political Class

    INDULGENCES FOR THE POLITICAL CLASS
    Rosslyn Smith

    American Thinker, WA
    Oct 18 2007

    Rick Moran seems to find virtue in the resolution on Armenian
    genocide. I do not. It takes little effort to say never again about
    horrors from the past. If the same people who support this resolution
    were also shouting NO about the major current crisis, the threat of a
    nuclear armed Iran, I might agree more with Rick about the importance
    of the gesture.

    But I fear votes such as this one are used as a plenary indulgence by
    Congressional leaders. By condemning events long past, those promoting
    this resolutions seek to completely absolve themselves for failing
    to deal constructively with atrocities currently in the making.

    It was terrible that the West did nothing in 1915 to help the
    Armenians, but everyone who bore responsibility is well beyond the
    reach of earthly justice. To alienate a key Muslim ally in the war
    on terror by politically embarrassing the grandchildren and great
    grandchildren of the perpetrators helps no one except those in Congress
    who need their regular fix of cheap political virtue

    In fact, I find this resolution particularly ironic. Not only is it
    against our nation's current interests, but it displays a trait that
    is almost un-American in the way it dredges up the past. Americans are
    known for our short collective memory. I doubt if a fraction of the
    population knows anything about World War I other than to guess that
    it probably came before World War II, much less how many people died
    because of it and why. With our culture's emphasis on the future and
    the value of personal as opposed to collective responsibility we find
    it hard to grasp that many in other parts of the World treat events
    from centuries ago as if they had personally happened to them only
    the day before yesterday.

    While ignoring the past as Americans are wont to do has its perils,
    obsessing over it as is common in the Middle East tends to be much
    worse. Those who obsess over the past often fail to see current issues
    and future outcomes. Ninety two years from today will the sponsors of
    this resolution find themselves facing condemnation for not acting on
    any number of evils in today's world.? I hope not, but I fear that if
    Congress continues on their current course the answer may well be Yes.

    I propose a statute of limitations on politicians dredging up the
    past for current gain. Ban all requests for apologies, resolutions
    of condemnation or demands for reparations for any act outside the
    recollection of any current member of Congress. The oldest member,
    Senator Byrd, was born in 1917. If Senator Byrd can't pull a personal
    anecdote about the incident from his huge repertoire, the topic should
    be declared off limits for official Congressional action.

    Historic evils should be the fodder of debates among historians not
    a quest for political indulgences among our current political leaders.

    The problem with mining collective guilt for political gain is that
    while it feels good today, the finger pointing never stops, the
    wounds never heal and hollow gestures tend to be repeatedly mistaken
    for progress.

    http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/200 7/10/indulgences_for_the_political.html
Working...
X