Tweet
PRESSURE BUILDS FOR ADL TO YIELD ON GENOCIDE ISSUE
By Keith O'Brien, Globe Staff
Boston Globe, MA
Oct 18 2007
Even as support crumbles in Congress for a resolution recognizing the
World War I-era Armenian genocide, several Massachusetts towns are
still calling on the Anti-Defamation League to clarify its position
on the matter and support the resolution.
This week alone, Lexington and Westwood have suspended their
involvement in a popular ADL antibigotry program, joining four other
communities - Watertown, Newton, Belmont, and Arlington - in protesting
the ADL's refusal to support the quest for genocide recognition.
Given the fading support for such a resolution in Congress,
Abraham H. Foxman, the ADL's national director, said he believes
his organization was being wrongly punished by these Massachusetts
communities.
"I don't think it's fair," Foxman told the Globe yesterday.
Still, local Armenian-Americans and the town officials who have voted
to pull out of the ADL's No Place For Hate program said they will
continue to pressure the ADL to specifically acknowledge the mass
killings as genocide no matter what Congress does. .
"The issue was not a political issue; the issue was a human rights
issue," said Marianne Ferguson, explaining why Newton's Human Rights
Commission, which she chairs, voted to pull out of the ADL antibigotry
program last month. "And to deny a history, and deny that it happened,
to say, 'Not so' - you can't do that and say you're a human rights
organization."
>From 1915 to 1923, Ottoman Turks slaughtered as many as 1.5 million
Armenians in what is now modern-day Turkey. Armenians, historians,
and nations including France and Canada have recognized the killings as
genocide. But the Turkish government has refused to accept the genocide
label and bristled recently over the possibility that Congress might
adopt the genocide resolution.
The uproar, which began last week when a House panel voted in favor of
the resolution, pushed several members of Congress to withdraw their
support. By yesterday, the number of cosponsors had fallen from 227
to 214 - not enough votes to pass - and Speaker Nancy Pelosi backed
off her pledge to bring the resolution to a vote of the entire House.
At issue for the Bush administration, Congress, and the ADL is Middle
East stability. Turkey is not only a rare Muslim ally of the United
States, but also of Israel. Approving the resolution might upset
the balance of the Middle East, some congressmen believe, and that
notion is shared by Foxman at ADL, an organization founded in 1913
to fight anti-Semitism.
"I think the good people of Congress have seen the light," Foxman
said yesterday. "Maybe the good people in the Massachusetts towns
who penalized us will also see the light."
For now, that seems unlikely. Under pressure in August, Foxman reversed
decades of ADL policy and called the Armenian tragedy "tantamount to
genocide" in a carefully worded written statement. But that did not
go far enough for local Armenian-Americans and many town officials.
"To me that's like saying slavery was tantamount to slavery, but not
exactly," said Ferguson.
Consequently, many still opposed to the ADL's position are making two
demands. They want the ADL to make a clear statement acknowledging
the genocide. And they want Foxman's human rights organization to
stand with Armenian-Americans in calling on the US government to
officially recognize the genocide.
"They're still hiding and will not say they're supporting the
resolution," said Watertown Town Councilor Marilyn Petitto Devaney.
"We're going to stand firm on it."
The ADL will have a chance to answer its critics in two weeks when
a national panel of members meets in New York to discuss potential
policy changes, including the organization's stance on the Armenian
genocide issue.
At that time, Lori Gans, a member of the ADL's New England executive
committee, said her first priority will be persuading the 300-member
panel to craft a statement acknowledging the genocide unequivocally.
In the meantime, Gans said, "The question is, how will this affect
us and our ability to do our work?" she said. "I don't know. Only
time will tell."
By Keith O'Brien, Globe Staff
Boston Globe, MA
Oct 18 2007
Even as support crumbles in Congress for a resolution recognizing the
World War I-era Armenian genocide, several Massachusetts towns are
still calling on the Anti-Defamation League to clarify its position
on the matter and support the resolution.
This week alone, Lexington and Westwood have suspended their
involvement in a popular ADL antibigotry program, joining four other
communities - Watertown, Newton, Belmont, and Arlington - in protesting
the ADL's refusal to support the quest for genocide recognition.
Given the fading support for such a resolution in Congress,
Abraham H. Foxman, the ADL's national director, said he believes
his organization was being wrongly punished by these Massachusetts
communities.
"I don't think it's fair," Foxman told the Globe yesterday.
Still, local Armenian-Americans and the town officials who have voted
to pull out of the ADL's No Place For Hate program said they will
continue to pressure the ADL to specifically acknowledge the mass
killings as genocide no matter what Congress does. .
"The issue was not a political issue; the issue was a human rights
issue," said Marianne Ferguson, explaining why Newton's Human Rights
Commission, which she chairs, voted to pull out of the ADL antibigotry
program last month. "And to deny a history, and deny that it happened,
to say, 'Not so' - you can't do that and say you're a human rights
organization."
>From 1915 to 1923, Ottoman Turks slaughtered as many as 1.5 million
Armenians in what is now modern-day Turkey. Armenians, historians,
and nations including France and Canada have recognized the killings as
genocide. But the Turkish government has refused to accept the genocide
label and bristled recently over the possibility that Congress might
adopt the genocide resolution.
The uproar, which began last week when a House panel voted in favor of
the resolution, pushed several members of Congress to withdraw their
support. By yesterday, the number of cosponsors had fallen from 227
to 214 - not enough votes to pass - and Speaker Nancy Pelosi backed
off her pledge to bring the resolution to a vote of the entire House.
At issue for the Bush administration, Congress, and the ADL is Middle
East stability. Turkey is not only a rare Muslim ally of the United
States, but also of Israel. Approving the resolution might upset
the balance of the Middle East, some congressmen believe, and that
notion is shared by Foxman at ADL, an organization founded in 1913
to fight anti-Semitism.
"I think the good people of Congress have seen the light," Foxman
said yesterday. "Maybe the good people in the Massachusetts towns
who penalized us will also see the light."
For now, that seems unlikely. Under pressure in August, Foxman reversed
decades of ADL policy and called the Armenian tragedy "tantamount to
genocide" in a carefully worded written statement. But that did not
go far enough for local Armenian-Americans and many town officials.
"To me that's like saying slavery was tantamount to slavery, but not
exactly," said Ferguson.
Consequently, many still opposed to the ADL's position are making two
demands. They want the ADL to make a clear statement acknowledging
the genocide. And they want Foxman's human rights organization to
stand with Armenian-Americans in calling on the US government to
officially recognize the genocide.
"They're still hiding and will not say they're supporting the
resolution," said Watertown Town Councilor Marilyn Petitto Devaney.
"We're going to stand firm on it."
The ADL will have a chance to answer its critics in two weeks when
a national panel of members meets in New York to discuss potential
policy changes, including the organization's stance on the Armenian
genocide issue.
At that time, Lori Gans, a member of the ADL's New England executive
committee, said her first priority will be persuading the 300-member
panel to craft a statement acknowledging the genocide unequivocally.
In the meantime, Gans said, "The question is, how will this affect
us and our ability to do our work?" she said. "I don't know. Only
time will tell."