Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bush-Cheney Vs. The Armenian Genocide

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bush-Cheney Vs. The Armenian Genocide

    BUSH-CHENEY VS. THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

    People's Weekly World
    http://www.pww.org/article/articleview/11948/1/39 6
    Oct 25 2007

    During World War I, the Turkish-controlled Ottoman Empire was
    crumbling. In the decades before the war, economic dislocation and
    political crisis intensified the long-standing oppression of the
    Armenian Christian minority. World War I (1915-1918) was a bloody war
    between rising and aging empires: the Ottoman Empire was allied with
    the German monarchy and the Austro-Hungarian Empire on the losing
    side, against an alliance of Czarist Russia, Britain, France, Japan
    and the United States.

    It was a war between two rival alliances seeking in effect to
    redivide the world, the winners taking from the losers their colonies,
    foreign markets and investment zones. Also, both alliance systems had
    for decades been fighting colonial wars in which their losses were
    relatively small compared with the enormous death and destruction they
    created for the peoples of Africa and Asia. They had come to see war
    as a relatively cheap and painless way to get what they wanted in
    world affairs. With imperialist arrogance, they stumbled into what
    became the biggest war in human history up to that point.

    Mass murder by a crumbling empire

    After an Ottoman attack against Russian forces in Czarist Russian
    Georgia ended in a disastrous military defeat in 1915, it became the
    trigger for the ultranationalists in power in Istanbul to undertake
    the mass murder of the empire's Armenian population. Propaganda was
    unleashed portraying Armenians as subversive agents of Russia. To this
    was added traditional stereotypes of Armenians as greedy businessmen
    exploiting Turks, as Christians plotting against Islam, as bandits
    and criminals.

    Legislation confiscating the property of Armenians was passed in
    1915. Armenians in the Turkish army were arrested and large numbers
    were executed without trial. The Turkish military and "special forces,"
    made up of thousands of recently released criminals, were unleashed to
    confiscate Armenian property and "resettle" Armenians in death marches,
    leaving innocent men, women and children to fight as best they could
    for their lives against armed representatives of the Ottoman state.

    These events were widely publicized in Britain, France and - thanks
    to the activities of Henry Morgenthau Sr., U.S. ambassador to the
    Ottoman Empire, and other U.S. officials, who observed and commented
    upon the mass murder - the then-neutral U.S., where campaigns were
    mounted to help the "starving Armenians."

    After World War II, scholars discovered evidence in various German
    archives corroborating the existence of this mass murder. (Germany,
    which had been an ally of the Ottomans, had no interest in publicizing
    this information.) But there was never any doubt that what was
    happening in the period 1915-1917 was the attempted mass murder of
    a whole nationality as part of Ottoman government policy.

    Under the United Nations Charter this constitutes genocide. After the
    genocide carried out by Nazi Germany and its fascist allies against all
    the Jewish people whom it could capture and kill during World War II,
    the genocide carried out by the Ottoman state against all Armenians
    whom it could capture and kill within its far-flung empire is the
    most researched genocide in history.

    This history is important to Americans today because the Bush
    administration has acted to block an attempt by the House of
    Representatives to join more than 20 other nations in specifically
    condemning these events as genocide. After the Democrats regained
    control of Congress in 2006, many hoped that this long-delayed
    resolution would finally be enacted.

    Chauvinism used by Turkish right wing

    Mustapha Kemal, an Ottoman general, established the modern Turkish
    Republic after World War I, combining an authoritarian nationalist
    ideology with various modernizing reforms. He remains the object of a
    large personality cult in Turkey, particularly among the business and
    military ruling groups who have always used Turkish chauvinist ideology
    against their enemies on the left and against their religious rivals.

    Turkey, which was neutral during World War II and then became a
    member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization because it was an
    anti-Soviet and anti-Communist state, has sought to prevent nations
    from using the term genocide for the mass murder of the Armenians,
    which it has largely denied, minimized and blamed in part on Armenian
    wartime subversion.

    Over the decades the U.S. and other nations, including, for its own
    regional military reasons, the government of Israel, have gone along
    with these efforts by Turkey. It was recently revealed that the Turkish
    government has employed a lobbying firm led by the disgraced former
    Republican House leader Robert Livingston to defeat the Armenian
    genocide condemnation. Livingston's firm has used the $12 million
    which it reportedly received from the Turkish government to buy
    opposition to the bill, news reports indicate. This, along with Bush
    administration propaganda that the House resolution would endanger
    U.S. troops in Iraq, has reduced support for the measure.

    An unholy alliance

    The Bush administration has undermined the separation of church and
    state in the U.S. in an unprecedented way and has allied itself
    domestically with conservative evangelical Christians. Yet it is
    actively seeking to keep the U.S. Congress from condemning the
    extermination of a Christian minority carried out on both racist
    and religious anti-Christian grounds. In the name of supporting "our
    troops," the Bush administration is appeasing a Turkish government
    and military whose oppression of the multinational Kurdish minority
    in the region, and previous history as an oppressive colonial power,
    make it a source for instability in the area. Turkey's one big
    drawing card for the White House, though, is its military power,
    which is the only thing that matters for this administration.

    If the Bush administration were serious about peace and stability
    in the region, it would use its influence to encourage the Turkish
    government to deal with its contemporary denial of cultural rights
    to its Kurdish and other minorities, not appease it in the hope that
    it will continue to act as a regional military henchman, the way the
    German Empire in World War I hoped that the Ottomans would act to
    advance its war aims.

    The Bush administration policy in Iraq is an ongoing, open-ended
    disaster which benefits only military contractors and their lobbyists
    in the U.S. The soldiers who have been sent to Iraq include many
    National Guardsmen often pulled from vital public sector occupations
    like police and firefighting. They will not return to the U.S. like
    some of their generals, who retire to become rich lobbyists for
    military contractors. And they won't be joining the gravy train of
    well-connected Republican members of Congress like Robert Livingston,
    who has now become a rich genocide-denying lobbyist for the Turkish
    government.

    We should contact our House members and senators and demand that they
    support the resolution on the Armenian genocide.

    In 1939, Hitler said privately to his officers, "Who, after all,
    speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?"

    Who does? Civilized people throughout the world.

    We must all tell the Bush administration that we do, or the horror
    will continue and perhaps a generation from today some other tyrant
    will say, to defend another attack on another people, "Who, after all,
    speaks today about the annihilation of the Jews?"

    Norman Markowitz is a history professor at Rutgers University.
Working...
X