Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Calamity in Turkey: A Hot Bed Over PKK Incursion, Armenian Genocide

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Calamity in Turkey: A Hot Bed Over PKK Incursion, Armenian Genocide

    Arabisto.com, FL
    Oct 28 2007


    Calamity in Turkey: A Hot Bed Over PKK Incursion and Armenian
    Genocide Resolution

    Beatrice Vanni
    October 28, 2007 09:26 AM

    It has now been a hot bed of activity for two weeks in Turkey with
    the military already bombing their Iraqi borders and panting for an
    incursion into northern Iraq to banish the PKK. Add to it the
    Armenian Genocide resolution hanging in the balance of the U.S. House
    and Turkey emerges in yet another controversy.

    Tumultuous times reared its head again in Turkey over these two
    issues and the masses repeatedly took to the streets demonstrating
    their resolve to annihilate


    the PKK and curse America for not getting on board with it. Add
    insult to injury over the Armenian Genocide Resolution 106 and we
    have a hornet's nest brewing in the bowels of Turkey.

    While the PKK ranks high on the agenda at the present time for
    Turkish, Iraqi and American governments to work together, the
    Armenian Genocide issue simmers on the back burner especially since
    Bush has been emphatically against its passage.

    Where is Turkey headed and what results are on the horizon? Is it the
    time to go into Iraqi territory with guns blazing? It is, afterall,
    the only area in Iraq that has been somewhat quiet through all this
    time.

    Clearly, Turkey bears the right to go after a terrorist organization
    which boldly takes lives on their sovereign soil and killing over
    30,000 of their citizens since the early eighties. Throughout this
    same time, whole villages were cleared out overnight and many times
    razed to the ground, many lost their jobs and families no longer
    whole. We see in Istanbul today the remains of those families who
    still live on the streets while the Turkish government tries to
    repatriate them to their own villages.

    >From 1999 to about 2002, the PKK underwent some changes to a more
    peaceful stance and all but disappeared for a couple years prior to
    the Iraq War. During that same time, tourism began blossoming in
    earnest in the east after many years of struggle, only to be eclipsed
    by the quagmire next door. Additionally, in recent years, the AK
    government began investing in the people of the eastern side and
    development proved fruitful.

    Unfortunately for Turkey, the PKK resurrected itself this time
    stronger than before and not just affecting eastern Turkey but many
    other areas as well with bombings and revenge against Turkish
    soldiers and citizens alike.

    Conversely, Turkey does not remain totally innocent in this Kurdish
    fight for its own state. The Turkish Kurds mostly live in the
    under-developed eastern part of the country where, traditionally,
    little investment occurred to build the infrastructure to support
    education, decent job opportunities and reasonable wages. One can
    still easily see remnants of the PKK impact with no schools in the
    villages for children to attend, poor sewage systems to support
    indoor plumbing, minimal electricity and even communal ovens for
    cooking.

    To face rising terror in this region once again and spilling over
    into other parts of Turkey, the government is hard-pressed not to
    respond with determination and force. Expecting their allies to
    support their request for incursion into northern Iraq, Turkey treads
    a fine line. Without Iraqi and American approval, Turkey risks
    escalation not only with the PKK, but also spawning unrest where none
    existed in this Kurdish border area of Iraq, and force coalition
    troops to stand at the ready.

    On the other hand, while it may now be America's duty to fight the
    PKK because it affects another part of Iraq and their Turkish ally,
    the PKK never have fought alongside the insurgents, Al Qaeda and
    other militants in Iraq. Thus, the PKK mattered little in the fight
    to get Iraq under control, and it was only right for the Iraqi
    government to focus on the factions hell-bent on creating strife
    instead of going into predominantly peaceful areas and stirring up
    the pot.

    It's understood that the escalation by the PKK ups the ante for the
    Turks; although, it begs an answer to how Iraq can avoid additional
    jeopardy of losing what calm has been achieved there, and the issue
    of the lack of American troops to support such a deployment to a
    peaceful area.

    So the dilemma returns to Turkey's back now. Will going into Iraq
    finally stop the PKK? If so, go but do so at great risk to relations
    with others. Will going against the wishes of the Iraqis and
    Americans create more of a quagmire not to be resolved for years?
    Possibly, because it can bring the PKK into the middle of something
    they don't want to be a part of, and at the same time, bring the Iraq
    War onto Turkish land.

    A joint Turkish-American operation against the PKK in northern Iraq
    bears credulity; however, if the Turks go into Iraq of their own
    volition, what keeps the likes of Iran or Syria wanting to play their
    hand to solve their own Kurdish issues? Moreover, should America
    participate in this venture cutting food, electricity and
    construction to a growing region at the risk of inflaming instead of
    defusing an already tenuous situation? Could it force the PKK to
    marry other factions unknown to be their pals in the past?

    While many questions cannot yet be answered, the Turkish government
    and her people must act with discretion and patience to combat the
    PKK and at the same time agree with their allies on the best solution
    to follow. While Turkey cannot afford to risk their reputation on the
    world platform, America must not abandon Turkey who has been the best
    of allies for 50 years.

    http://www.arabisto.com/p_blogEntry.cfm?blogEntr yID=872
Working...
X