Tweet
BOOK REVIEW: OTHER COLOURS BY ORHAN PAMUK
Written by Richard Marcus
Blogcritics.org, OH
Published September 19, 2007
One of the wonderful things about reading books is that occasionally
you get to read about something from a whole different perspective than
the one you are exposed to normally. Our media report on the world from
the perspective of our own society, which makes sense, as they have
to represent the philosophies of those who buy their publications. But
that gives us only one perception of events, only half a conversation,
one side of the story. When we work up the nerve to leave our insulated
shores and read something from a point of view other than the one that
appears nightly on our television or continually in our mass media,
it can be both a shock to our systems and an eye-opening experience.
For those who follow international events, i.e. the world outside
the sphere of most Americans' interest, one of the bigger stories has
been Turkey's application to join the European Union (EU). There's a
lot of history between Turkey and Europe, dating back to the days of
the Crusades, when the Europeans tried to reclaim the territory they
called the Holy Land but the Turks called home. Open warfare only
ended with the collapse of the Ottoman Empire at the end of World
War One and the capture of Jerusalem by the British.
Although mostly Muslim by population, the modern Turkish state has
always taken pride in being secular, with complete separation of
church and state. But the West's mistrust of the East, including
Turkey, persists. In part, this is caused by what seems to be a state
of continual political unrest in Turkey (the most recent coup having
taken place in the 1980s) and the recent strong showing of non-secular
parties in various elections.
Therefore, the stories we do get in the news about the proposed entry
of Turkey into the EU all express European concerns. Now, there is no
denying that the concerns about human rights and religious tolerance
can't be ignored, but what about opinions from the other side? Do
we even know the people of Turkey, or anything about their country,
their society, and how they go about their days? What image do we
have of them, if any at all?
This is where literature can help fill the gaps in our awareness,
especially if the writer in question is a recent Nobel Prize laureate
whose political independence is unquestioned. Orhan Pamuk's newest
release Other Colours (published by Random House Canada through it's
imprint Knopf Canada) may not be the definitive book on the opinions
and views of the Turkish people, but it represents a perspective that
we rarely see.
I have the impression that giving Westerners a Turkish perspective
might have been Mr. Pamuk's intention with this book, because of the
sections he's divided it into. He starts off with short essays under
the title "Living and Worrying," which detail his day-to-day existence
with family and friends. Predominant in this section are descriptions
of adventures he has with his daughter, and the earthquake of 1999
that shattered Turkey.
We also get his ideas about writing, descriptions of living in
his home city of Istanbul, and the overwhelming impression, which
permeates all his work, of a melancholy of the soul that is pervasive
among the city's inhabitants. Istanbul is a city steeped in history
and haunted by its past, troubled by its future, and worried about
the present. As in Los Angeles, its inhabitants sit and wait for the
"big one" which will obliterate them, while playing the speculative
game of "if it falls, will it land on us?"
There are also a couple of chapters that deal with Pamuk's relationship
to other people's writing and his own, but the chapter that will
interest those wanting a different perspective on the potential
union of Turkey and Europe is "Politics, Europe, And Other Problems
Of Being Oneself."
The picture drawn of Turkey in these pages is full of
contradictions. In some ways Turks are cynical enough to believe
that in the end, none of what they do or say will really have any
bearing on their acceptance into the European Union. Why else would
they prosecute a writer of Orhan Pamuk's reputation for speaking a
truth that is universally accepted? In an interview with a European
newspaper, Pamuk talked about the genocide of Armenians and Kurds by
the Turks, and estimated that Turkey had killed around one million
Armenians and fifty thousand Kurds. In Turkey this subject is not
allowed to be discussed.
For speaking those simple truths - facts written down in history books
all over the world - he was charged under Article 301, "publicly
denigrating Turkish identity." Pamuk writes very matter-of-factly
about how during this period the ultra-nationalist newspapers called
for his "silencing," and his books were burnt. Compared to some of his
contemporaries the charges against him were slim, and he fully expected
to win his case. The last thing he wanted or thought would happen was
to become a cause celèbre and a poster child for the rights of authors.
He recounts how a fellow author and friend, on hearing the news of
his being charged, congratulated him for finally becoming a real
Turkish author. Pamuk says he wasn't at all surprised to find himself
eventually put on trial, and it seems the only way an author will be
honoured in Turkey is if he has spent time in jail.
But he also places his arrest in the context of world affairs, showing
how different the East's view of the world is from that of the West.
Pamuk says there is a dichotomy being faced by the people of countries
like India, Russia, China, and Japan who have suddenly become members
of the global economy. To compensate for their espousal of Western
economic goals that contrast so much with their traditional learning,
and to prevent being overly criticized for their newfound wealth,
they sometimes resort to rabid nationalism. He doesn't spare the West,
though - how can he sell its brand of freedom and democracy to his
people when the war in Iraq and revelations of secret CIA prisons
have so damaged its credibility?
It seems that the problem for people of conscience, like Orhan Pamuk,
in countries on the cusp of a democratic system of government, is the
question of what example they can hold up to their people of how life
should be. That is what we never see in our news sources. No Western
political leader of any stripe dares to get up in public and say what
needs to be said: in spite of what you've been told to the contrary,
nobody outside the United States sees the US or Britain - or Canada,
considering its current government - as a shining example of freedom
or democracy. The light cast by our governments' endeavours no longer
serves as a beacon guiding anybody to anything except hostility
and resistance.
If Pamuk thought his words made him unpopular in his homeland for
speaking the truth, the ideas he postulates aren't going to go down
as a treat anywhere else in the world either - neither in the United
States, Britain, and Canada, where the beacons have sputtered out, nor
in India, China, Japan, Russia, and Turkey, which are embracing Western
economic ideals but becoming less tolerant of diversity and truth.
Other Colours is about more than world politics - it's about life in
one of the world's oldest cities as seen through the eyes of a keen
and passionate observer.
But the world has intruded upon Istanbul - or Istanbul is stepping
out into the world again - with results that look similar to what is
happening elsewhere. How else, besides fear of change and compensation
for embracing alien Western values, do you explain a secular country's
sudden swing towards religious political parties?
Whatever the reasons, Turkey is experiencing profound changes, and
reactions there are as good an indication as any of the moderate
East's opinion of the West. I can't think of any man more sensitive
to, and capable of documenting, these events than Orhan Parmuk, and
if you care about the world beyond your borders, you would be remiss
not to read every word of this book carefully. Somewhere within lies
the secret by which we might all survive the next decade or so as the
world's balance of power shifts. Pamuk might not come right out with
the answer, but he asks the right questions to put us on the road to
discovering it.
--Boundary_(ID_6Np9j+7xv270nBqi4XRBSw)--
Written by Richard Marcus
Blogcritics.org, OH
Published September 19, 2007
One of the wonderful things about reading books is that occasionally
you get to read about something from a whole different perspective than
the one you are exposed to normally. Our media report on the world from
the perspective of our own society, which makes sense, as they have
to represent the philosophies of those who buy their publications. But
that gives us only one perception of events, only half a conversation,
one side of the story. When we work up the nerve to leave our insulated
shores and read something from a point of view other than the one that
appears nightly on our television or continually in our mass media,
it can be both a shock to our systems and an eye-opening experience.
For those who follow international events, i.e. the world outside
the sphere of most Americans' interest, one of the bigger stories has
been Turkey's application to join the European Union (EU). There's a
lot of history between Turkey and Europe, dating back to the days of
the Crusades, when the Europeans tried to reclaim the territory they
called the Holy Land but the Turks called home. Open warfare only
ended with the collapse of the Ottoman Empire at the end of World
War One and the capture of Jerusalem by the British.
Although mostly Muslim by population, the modern Turkish state has
always taken pride in being secular, with complete separation of
church and state. But the West's mistrust of the East, including
Turkey, persists. In part, this is caused by what seems to be a state
of continual political unrest in Turkey (the most recent coup having
taken place in the 1980s) and the recent strong showing of non-secular
parties in various elections.
Therefore, the stories we do get in the news about the proposed entry
of Turkey into the EU all express European concerns. Now, there is no
denying that the concerns about human rights and religious tolerance
can't be ignored, but what about opinions from the other side? Do
we even know the people of Turkey, or anything about their country,
their society, and how they go about their days? What image do we
have of them, if any at all?
This is where literature can help fill the gaps in our awareness,
especially if the writer in question is a recent Nobel Prize laureate
whose political independence is unquestioned. Orhan Pamuk's newest
release Other Colours (published by Random House Canada through it's
imprint Knopf Canada) may not be the definitive book on the opinions
and views of the Turkish people, but it represents a perspective that
we rarely see.
I have the impression that giving Westerners a Turkish perspective
might have been Mr. Pamuk's intention with this book, because of the
sections he's divided it into. He starts off with short essays under
the title "Living and Worrying," which detail his day-to-day existence
with family and friends. Predominant in this section are descriptions
of adventures he has with his daughter, and the earthquake of 1999
that shattered Turkey.
We also get his ideas about writing, descriptions of living in
his home city of Istanbul, and the overwhelming impression, which
permeates all his work, of a melancholy of the soul that is pervasive
among the city's inhabitants. Istanbul is a city steeped in history
and haunted by its past, troubled by its future, and worried about
the present. As in Los Angeles, its inhabitants sit and wait for the
"big one" which will obliterate them, while playing the speculative
game of "if it falls, will it land on us?"
There are also a couple of chapters that deal with Pamuk's relationship
to other people's writing and his own, but the chapter that will
interest those wanting a different perspective on the potential
union of Turkey and Europe is "Politics, Europe, And Other Problems
Of Being Oneself."
The picture drawn of Turkey in these pages is full of
contradictions. In some ways Turks are cynical enough to believe
that in the end, none of what they do or say will really have any
bearing on their acceptance into the European Union. Why else would
they prosecute a writer of Orhan Pamuk's reputation for speaking a
truth that is universally accepted? In an interview with a European
newspaper, Pamuk talked about the genocide of Armenians and Kurds by
the Turks, and estimated that Turkey had killed around one million
Armenians and fifty thousand Kurds. In Turkey this subject is not
allowed to be discussed.
For speaking those simple truths - facts written down in history books
all over the world - he was charged under Article 301, "publicly
denigrating Turkish identity." Pamuk writes very matter-of-factly
about how during this period the ultra-nationalist newspapers called
for his "silencing," and his books were burnt. Compared to some of his
contemporaries the charges against him were slim, and he fully expected
to win his case. The last thing he wanted or thought would happen was
to become a cause celèbre and a poster child for the rights of authors.
He recounts how a fellow author and friend, on hearing the news of
his being charged, congratulated him for finally becoming a real
Turkish author. Pamuk says he wasn't at all surprised to find himself
eventually put on trial, and it seems the only way an author will be
honoured in Turkey is if he has spent time in jail.
But he also places his arrest in the context of world affairs, showing
how different the East's view of the world is from that of the West.
Pamuk says there is a dichotomy being faced by the people of countries
like India, Russia, China, and Japan who have suddenly become members
of the global economy. To compensate for their espousal of Western
economic goals that contrast so much with their traditional learning,
and to prevent being overly criticized for their newfound wealth,
they sometimes resort to rabid nationalism. He doesn't spare the West,
though - how can he sell its brand of freedom and democracy to his
people when the war in Iraq and revelations of secret CIA prisons
have so damaged its credibility?
It seems that the problem for people of conscience, like Orhan Pamuk,
in countries on the cusp of a democratic system of government, is the
question of what example they can hold up to their people of how life
should be. That is what we never see in our news sources. No Western
political leader of any stripe dares to get up in public and say what
needs to be said: in spite of what you've been told to the contrary,
nobody outside the United States sees the US or Britain - or Canada,
considering its current government - as a shining example of freedom
or democracy. The light cast by our governments' endeavours no longer
serves as a beacon guiding anybody to anything except hostility
and resistance.
If Pamuk thought his words made him unpopular in his homeland for
speaking the truth, the ideas he postulates aren't going to go down
as a treat anywhere else in the world either - neither in the United
States, Britain, and Canada, where the beacons have sputtered out, nor
in India, China, Japan, Russia, and Turkey, which are embracing Western
economic ideals but becoming less tolerant of diversity and truth.
Other Colours is about more than world politics - it's about life in
one of the world's oldest cities as seen through the eyes of a keen
and passionate observer.
But the world has intruded upon Istanbul - or Istanbul is stepping
out into the world again - with results that look similar to what is
happening elsewhere. How else, besides fear of change and compensation
for embracing alien Western values, do you explain a secular country's
sudden swing towards religious political parties?
Whatever the reasons, Turkey is experiencing profound changes, and
reactions there are as good an indication as any of the moderate
East's opinion of the West. I can't think of any man more sensitive
to, and capable of documenting, these events than Orhan Parmuk, and
if you care about the world beyond your borders, you would be remiss
not to read every word of this book carefully. Somewhere within lies
the secret by which we might all survive the next decade or so as the
world's balance of power shifts. Pamuk might not come right out with
the answer, but he asks the right questions to put us on the road to
discovering it.
--Boundary_(ID_6Np9j+7xv270nBqi4XRBSw)--