Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What would Lemkin do?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • What would Lemkin do?

    What would Lemkin do?

    By Khatchig Mouradian - Thursday September 27 2007

    When dealing with ethnic cleansing and genocide, it would be useful to
    ask: What would Lemkin do? Had world leaders and human rights
    organizations asked that question and acted based on the answer over
    the past 50 years, several mass murders and genocides could have been
    prevented or stopped in Europe, Africa and Asia.
    Raphael Lemkin, a Polish-Jew, coined the term "genocide" in 1944 based
    on the planned extermination of the Armenians by the Ottoman Turks in
    1915 and the Jews during World War II. He worked tirelessly to have
    the United Nations pass a law on the prevention and punishment of that
    crime. Finally, on Dec. 9, 1948, the UN General Assembly ratified the
    Genocide Convention. Remembering that moment, Lemkin, who lost 49
    relatives during the Holocaust, wrote: "Somebody requested a roll
    call. The first to vote was India. After her 'yes' there was an
    endless number of 'yeses.' A storm of applause followed. I felt on my
    face the flashlight of cameras. ... The world was smiling and approving
    and I had only one word in answer to all that, 'thanks.'"
    Lemkin referred to the Armenian genocide on numerous occasions. In an
    article in the Hairenik Weekly (later the Armenian Weekly) on Jan. 1,
    1959, he wrote that the suffering of the Armenians had paved the way
    to the ratification of the Genocide Convention: "The sufferings of the
    Armenian men, women, and children thrown into the Euphrates River or
    massacred on the way to [the Syrian desert of] Der-el-Zor have
    prepared the way for the adoption for the Genocide Convention by the
    United Nations. ... This is the reason why the Armenians of the entire
    world were specifically interested in the Genocide Convention. They
    filled the galleries of the drafting committee at the third General
    Assembly of the United Nations in Paris when the Genocide Convention
    was discussed."
    At the end of the article, Lemkin asserted, "One million Armenians
    died, but a law against the murder of peoples was written with the ink
    of their blood and the spirit of their sufferings."
    Fast forward to 2007. The Anti-Defamation league, an organization that
    has tirelessly spoken out and acted against Holocaust denial, as well
    as more recent acts of genocide from Eastern Europe to Darfur,
    continues to speak with ambiguities about the Armenian genocide and
    oppose Congressional legislation affirming the historical record,
    considering it "counterproductive."
    Days after the ADL's national director, Abraham Foxman, was confronted
    on the issue, he wrote a letter to Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip
    Erdogan "to express our sorrow over what we have caused for the
    leadership and people of Turkey in the past few days."
    Countless Jewish organizations, scholars, journalists, bloggers and
    activists have come out fiercely to criticize the ADL's hypocrisy.
    They have all asked the right question - What would Lemkin do? - and
    have come up with the right answer, thus honoring Lemkin's legacy.
    Perhaps rather than rushing to appease the Turkish government, the ADL
    would do well to ask the right question, too.

    Khatchig Mouradian is an Armenian journalist, poet and translator
    based in Boston. He is the editor of the Armenian Weekly.

    Source: http://www.thejewishadvocate.com/this_weeks_issue/ opinions/
Working...
X