Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Latest issue of Genocide Studies and Prevention highlights new dirx

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Latest issue of Genocide Studies and Prevention highlights new dirx

    AZG Armenian Daily #015, 31/01/2009

    Press Release

    LATEST ISSUE OF GENOCIDE STUDIES AND PREVENTION HIGHLIGHTS NEW
    DIRECTIONS IN GENOCIDE RESEARCH

    As Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal completes
    its third year of publication, its latest issue presents some
    interesting and influential new directions in the field. The topics
    presented include: the insidious role rape plays within a genocidal
    context, affecting not only women but entire societies; insight into
    the paradox of genocide prevention; a review and critique of
    comparative genocide theory; the importance and effects of teaching
    genocide; and the role hate speech plays in ethnic violence and
    genocide.

    "Rape as a Weapon of Genocide" by Alison Ruby Reid-Cunningham, PhD
    Candidate, School of Social Welfare, at the University of
    California-Berkeley is one of the few scholarly articles on rape in
    genocide. This is an extremely timely issue in light of the ongoing
    use of rape as a weapon both in the Darfur region of Sudan and in the
    Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Reid-Cunningham examines the cases
    of Bosnia-Herzegovina, Rwanda, Darfur, and the DRC and argues that the
    impact of rape pierces the entire community and is a means of cultural
    control. Her thorough analysis moves genocide studies much farther
    along the path toward understanding how crimes against women become
    "generalized to the whole population as survivors, witnesses,
    families, and communities internalize rape as an assault on their
    collective consciousness."

    Robert Melson, the Cathy Cohen-Lasry Distinguished Professor in the
    Strassler Family Center for Holocaust and Genocide Studies at Clark
    University investigates "Churchill in Munich: The Paradox of Genocide
    Prevention." The paradox involves the irony that leaders who have gone
    to great lengths to prevent catastrophes are not rewarded for their
    actions, simply because society only sees the cost spent on
    prevention, and there is no proof of their success if the genocide is
    adverted.

    The third article, "Theorizing Destruction: Reflections on the State
    of Comparative Genocide Theory," is by Maureen Hiebert, Assistant
    Professor, Law and Society Program, Faculty of Communications and
    Culture, at the University of Calgary and an ongoing Faculty member of
    the GHRUP. She illustrates that although comparative genocide
    theorizing has come a long way in explaining the onset of genocide and
    genocidal process, there is still much work to be done. Professor
    Hiebert believes that comparative genocide studies' focus on
    definitions of genocide leaves the discipline under-theorized relative
    to other disciplines in the social sciences and humanities. In
    addition, she argues that the discipline requires more rigorous
    testing of the existing theories using comparative methodological
    practices. Ultimately she concludes that genocide scholars must find a
    way to "bridge the gap between abstract theorizing¦and concrete
    policy making."

    Henry Maitles, Faculty of Education, University of Strathclyde,
    Glasgow, examines the question "'Why are we learning this?': Does
    Studying the Holocaust Encourage Better Citizenship Values?". This
    study followed a cohort of 100 students (aged 11-12) who studied the
    Holocaust and compared their values one year later both to their
    earlier attitudes and to those of their peers who had not studied the
    Holocaust. Professor Maitles found that in general, learning about the
    Holocaust had a positive effect on students' attitudes on contemporary
    issues, such as racism and discrimination.

    Lastly, "Counteracting Hate Speech as a Way of Preventing Genocidal
    Violence" by Wibke Timmerman, PhD Candidate, Irish Centre for Human
    Rights, at the National University of Ireland suggests that "In order
    to successfully prevent genocidal crimes and violence, it is
    indispensable to effectively address the problem of systematic
    incitement of hatred." Timmerman further suggests that effectively
    addressing this problem would require state-organized hate propaganda
    to be criminalized under international law. The criminalization of
    hate speech sits on a slippery slope with risks to freedom of speech,
    and thus this article opens up an important discussion, but falls
    short of answering some critical questions in terms of utility in
    genocide prevention.

    Editor Herb Hirsch, Professor of Government and Public Affairs at
    Virginia Commonwealth University, proudly notes in his introduction
    some of the groundbreaking topics the journal has covered in its first
    three years of publication. He states that the editors are looking
    forward to the fourth year of the journal and a continued trend in
    presenting new and innovative material.

    Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal was
    co-founded by the International Association of Genocide Scholars and
    the International Institute for Genocide and Human Rights Studies (A
    Division of the Zoryan Institute). The journal's mission is to
    understand the phenomenon of genocide, create an awareness of it as an
    ongoing scourge, and promote the necessity of preventing it, for both
    pragmatic and moral reasons. It is the official journal of the
    International Association of Genocide Scholars and is published three
    times a year by the University of Toronto Press. For more information,
    contact the IIGHRS at [email protected] or Tel: 416-250-9807.
Working...
X