Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Currently Armenia has no domestic resources for coup d'etat

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Currently Armenia has no domestic resources for coup d'etat

    /PanARMENIAN.Net/

    Currently Armenia has no domestic resources for coup d'état
    Home policy review for January 25-31, 2010
    30.01.2010 GMT+04:00

    The internal political life of Armenia acquired its former course, and
    the past week was marked by the visits of a number of distinguished
    guests from neighbouring countries. Yerevan hosted Iranian Foreign
    Minister Manouchehr Mottaki, Prime Minister of Georgia Nikoloz Gilauri
    and Mayor of Moscow Yuri Luzhkov. The week was also devoted to various
    estimates by political forces and experts concerning the trilateral
    meeting between the Presidents of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Russia in
    Sochi.

    /PanARMENIAN.Net/ The week began with a meeting of Armenian Defense
    Minister Seyran Ohanyan with students and instructors of Yerevan State
    University. `I am always guided by the principle: `If you want peace,
    prepare for war'. We never exclude the possibility of a military
    solution to the Karabakh conflict on the part of Azerbaijan, but the
    Armenian army is always ready to defend their homeland,' declared the
    Minister of Defense. According to him, NKR cannot be part of
    Azerbaijan. `In this regard, we raise three problems: the right of NKR
    people to self-determination should be respected, Nagorno-Karabakh
    should have a land connection with Armenia and its security must be
    ensured by international guarantees,' the Defense Minister stressed.

    The same day Razmik Zohrabyan, Deputy Chairman of the ruling
    Republican Party of Armenia, was the first to assess the tripartite
    meeting between the Presidents of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Russia in
    Sochi. Touching upon the surrender of territories, the Republican
    Party representative said `It is out of the question' until the scopes
    of compromise are clarified. `Transitional status is not yet defined,
    and it is still unknown how the people of Karabakh can express their
    will. I think the parties have no idea how this can occur,' the MP
    said. He predicted that after the meeting in Sochi it would become
    clear whether or not a framework agreement would be signed on
    Karabakh. `However, no framework agreement will be signed till the
    yearend, I suppose,' Zohrabyan stressed.

    At a joint press conference a similar assessment was given to the
    Sochi meeting by Social Democrat Hunchakian Party board member Vardan
    Khachatryan and Member of the Republican Party of Armenia Karen
    Avagyan. `It would be unrealistic to believe that all issues related
    to Karabakh conflict settlement could be given final resolution during
    the trilateral presidential meeting in Sochi,' declared Avagyan.
    According to him, every presidential meeting is a step forward to
    conflict resolution. He noted that the only fact that the
    Nagorno-Karabakh status was discussed at the latest meeting could be
    regarded as progress.

    Vardan Khachatryan, for his part, noted that despite the recent
    progress, Baku keeps demanding the impossible to gain maximum benefit,
    with President Aliyev repeatedly bringing up the issue of military
    settlement of Karabakh conflict.

    `Negotiations will not definitely accelerate the conflict settlement
    process, but the outcome of Armenian, Russian and Azerbaijani
    Presidents' meeting in Sochi will enable Turkey to speed up the
    ratification of Armenian-Turkish Protocols,' declared Deputy Director
    of the Caucasus Institute Sergey Minasyan in an interview to
    PanARMENIAN.Net.

    Tuesday, January 26, President Serzh Sargsyan received Prime Minister
    of Georgia Nikoloz Gilauri, who paid a working visit to Yerevan to
    attend the 8th session of the intergovernmental commission on economic
    cooperation between Armenia and Georgia. At the meeting President
    Sargsyan noted that Yerevan is ready to further extend cooperation
    with Tbilisi. In his turn, Gilauri conveyed to the Armenian President
    Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili's invitation to visit Georgia.

    On the same day Yerevan hosted a pre-planning conference on Combined
    Endeavor 2010 exercise. The event organized by the U.S. European
    Command brought together 300 communication specialists from 34
    countries, including NATO members and partner states.

    On January 26 Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki paid a
    working visit to Yerevan to attend the 9th session of the
    Armenian-Iranian intergovernmental commission. During the visit
    Iranian Foreign Minister met with president of Armenia, RA prime
    minister, speaker of the Armenian National Assembly, secretary of the
    RA National Security Council and Armenian foreign minister. At the
    meeting with Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandyan, the counterparts
    discussed bilateral, regional and international issues. The foreign
    ministers also touched upon the Karabakh conflict settlement and
    normalization of Armenian-Turkish relations. Manouchehr Mottaki
    presented to Edward Nalbandyan the processes related to the nuclear
    program of Iran.

    Another positive evaluation of the tripartite presidential meeting in
    Sochi was voiced Tuesday by Director of Analytical Research Center
    Ruben Hakobyan. `The Sargsyan-Aliyev-Medvedev meeting in Sochi met our
    expectations,' Hakobyan said at a press conference in Yerevan. As to
    the preamble of revised Madrid principles, Hakobyan said: `I'm not
    aware of the contents of the preamble, but Karabakh conflict is
    expected to be settled in compliance with 2 international norms -
    territorial integrity and the right of nations to self-determination.'

    Ruben Hakobyan also highlighted that during the past two decades, the
    inner and outer life of Armenia has been conditioned by the Karabakh
    conflict. Hakobyan did not share the view of some experts, who claim
    that any progress in the Karabakh conflict may raise the issue of coup
    d'état. `Armenia does not have the corresponding resources. The
    `immune system' of the country is too weak,' said Hakobyan.

    The recent presidential meeting in Sochi repeated the scenario of
    previous meetings, according to ARFD parliamentary group member Hrayr
    Karapetyan. Karapetyan believes there was much fuss both now and prior
    to the Meindorf meeting, but expectations were not met in either case.
    According to the MP, Azerbaijan should realize that Karabakh will
    never be part of it and it should be involved in talks as an
    independent party.

    Next day, January 27, the Sochi meeting was once again criticized,
    this time by the Heritage party. `I consider that the trilateral
    meeting between the Presidents of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Russia in
    Sochi was another defective meeting,' declared Heritage party
    secretary, MP Larisa Alaverdyan. According to her, presidential
    meetings without Artsakh leader's participation can't be considered
    talks on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict settlement. `Presidential
    meetings have only one positive side: while they continue, there is
    hope that there will be no war,' Alaverdyan noticed.

    On January 27, President Serzh Sargsyan received Iranian Foreign
    Minister Manouchehr Mottaki. The President noted the importance of the
    Armenian-Iranian intergovernmental commission. `You know how much we
    value the relations with Iran and we consider you a reliable partner
    and a country of key importance in the region,' Sargsyan said,
    addressing to the Iranian FM.

    Wednesday was also marked by another event: the Republican Party of
    Armenia, `Prosperous Armenia' and `Orinats Yerkir' issued a statement
    regarding the interview of PACE President Mevlut Cavusoglu to Azeri
    news agency APA. `Some of PACE President's comments call into question
    his impartiality in the perception of Nagorno-Karabakh. PACE President
    has a wrong perception of the nature and details of the issue, as well
    as of negotiation progress concerning the problem in question,' the
    joint statement said. Armenian coalition parties urged RA NA speaker
    to clarify with PACE President the reliability of the interview in
    question and demand explanations, also asking Cavusoglu to specify
    whether his words should be regarded as the official position of PACE.
    If necessary, the RA NA Speaker was also to discuss the issue of
    suspension of the Armenian delegation's activities in PACE during
    Mevlut Cavusoglu's presidency.

    Next day, January 28, Armenian NA Speaker Hovik Abrahamyan had a
    telephone conversation with newly-elected PACE President Mevlut
    Cavusoglu. During the conversation Cavusoglu informed the NA Speaker
    that on January 26 the Azerbaijani news agency APA had misinterpreted
    his remarks, ascribing him statements he had not uttered. The PACE
    President assured that these statements were the result of a wrong
    interpretation and mistreatment of the Azerbaijani media
    representatives.

    On January 28 Armenia celebrated the 18th anniversary of formation of
    the Armenian National Army. Traditionally on this day the country's
    top leaders visit the Memorial of Military Volunteers Yerablur to
    commemorate the soldiers who sacrificed their lives for the
    motherland.

    The day was crowned with a solemn concert devoted to 18th anniversary
    of the Armenian Army. Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan, Ex-President
    Robert Kocharyan, Chairman of the National Assembly Hovik Abrahamyan,
    and Defense Minister Seyran Ohanyan were present at the concert.

    At the end of the week Leader of Constitutional Right Union party Hayk
    Babukhanyan made a series of dramatic statements at a press
    conference. According to him, Armenia should think of developing
    nuclear weapon as a deterrent to Turkey's genocidal policy.

    Another scandalous statement issued by Babukhanyan concerned the
    Heritage Party. Babukhanyan believes that Armenian authorities should
    suspend the Party's activities, because of its destructive position in
    the PACE and assistance to Turkish-Azerbaijani policy. Soon Leader of
    Heritage faction Stepan Safaryan disapproved Hayk Babukhanyan's
    statement on the party's anti-governmental policy. According to
    Safaryan, `There is reliable information that leader of Constitutional
    Right Union receives funding from an oligarch representing one of the
    three coalition parties.'

    On January 29 Armenian Parliament held a working meeting, which
    discussed the draft agenda of the RA NA spring session. The agenda
    includes 78 issues and 14 international treaties.

    Mikhail Balayan
Working...
X