Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What Can They Say If They Don't Have Anything To Say

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • What Can They Say If They Don't Have Anything To Say

    WHAT CAN THEY SAY IF THEY DON'T HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY
    S. Harutyunyan

    Hayots Ashkhar Daily
    06 Nov 08
    Armenia

    When commenting on the Moscow meeting among the Russian, Armenian
    and Azerbaijani Presidents Levon Ter-Petrosyan over again affirmed
    that he has lost his sense of reality.

    The joint declaration displayed that LTP was sadly mistaken when he
    announced in his farewell speech in October that Russia will resolutely
    be withdrawn from the process of the settlement of Karabakh conflict,
    that it is losing its influence on the world, on the region and on
    Armenia. And that President Serge Sargsyan is responsible for that,
    because he has turned his face from our friend Russia and has adopted
    a criminal pro-western policy.

    But Ter-Petrosyan wouldn't be Ter-Petrosyan had he accepted his
    mistake and apologized to the public for misleading the latter. Thus
    loyal to the role of a fortune-teller, in this case also he appeared
    as an oracle expressing an authorized opinion that the trilateral
    declaration is "nothing more than the top of the iceberg and a much
    more detailed protocol is hidden under it."

    By envisaging the hidden part of the iceberg he hurried to record
    that the conversation was about resolution 62/243 passed by the UN
    General Assembly and PACE resolution 1614 "which recognize Azerbaijan's
    territorial integrity and demand an unreserved withdrawal of Armenian
    forces from the Azerbaijani territories neighboring Karabakh."

    Thus, saying Azerbaijan's "territorial integrity" the first
    President most probably means that Karabakh is the inseparable part
    of Azerbaijan, unlike the second and the third Presidents, who have
    many times openly underscored that NKR has never and will never form
    part of Azerbaijan.

    It's worth mentioning that the before mentioned "problematic"
    resolutions duplicate the formulations of the resolutions passed by
    the UN during LTP's years of power (1992-1994), which Azerbaijan used
    to refresh from time to time.

    Like someone who has made a revelation, LTP announced that as he has
    already underscored many times "The idea of the "Madrid proposal"
    is the synchronization of the two principles of international law:
    territorial integrity and nations' self-determination."

    And of course he modestly passed round the fact that there is no word
    about self-determination in his favorite "phase by phase", version of
    "honorable peace".

    The international community has very clearly formulated the "ideology"
    of the "phase by phase" settlement, in 1997 OSCE Summit in Lisbon, by
    unanimously voting for the settlement of Karabakh conflict in favor
    of Azerbaijan's territorial integrity, that is to say in favor of
    ceding Karabakh phase by phase, which the elite belonging to Armenian
    Pan National movement is trying to refuse.

    Anyhow LTP doesn't lose his hope that the monopoly of solving Karabakh
    issue "belongs to the West". Moreover the Moscow meeting of the
    Presidents, according to him, is only the beginning of the final
    stage of the settlement, and that the West will put a full stop to
    this process "in December in the United States of America".

    I wonder what will he say when this balloon also blasts, when the dream
    of the Armenian Pan National Movement about burying NKR independence
    (thus duplicating the precedent of 1998) and takeover blows up.

    Yet again he will record with disappointment that in this case as well
    the criminal administration cheated the international community and
    fell short of the negotiation process. Overlooking the fact that he
    was the one to teach Serge Sargsyan during his last meeting, how to
    cheat the West - by including NKR issue in the NA agenda and leave
    it undecided, to make it a tool or a factor for neutralizing the
    possible foreign pressures.
Working...
X