Tweet
Palestinians push Nativity church as Heritage site
http://timesleader.com/stories/Palestinians-push-Nativity-church-as-Heritage-site,167195#ixzz1yhWcsr00
Jun 23
The Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem is becoming the church of
contention, with a bid by the Palestinians to use their position as
the newest members of the U.N.'s cultural arm to obtain World Heritage
status for the iconic Christian site and perhaps boost their own
campaign for legitimacy.
The effort by the Palestinian Authority, like its overall efforts for
global recognition for an independent Palestinian state, is drawing
resistance. And it may fail at the World Heritage Committee meeting
that starts Sunday.
An experts committee has turned down the emergency bid to quickly
confer on the Church of the Nativity, and its pilgrimage route, the
status as an endangered World Heritage site, saying the application
needs more work. Even custodians of the holy site, the Greek Orthodox,
Roman Catholic and Armenian churches are opposed, according to a
document obtained by The Associated Press.
The church which drew some 2 million visitors last year and parts of
which are 1,500 years old stands above the grotto that Christians
believe was the birthplace of Jesus. The Palestinians' application
asks for recognition as a site of "outstanding universal value"
urgently in need of attention.
There is concern by the United States and others that the Bethlehem
holy site and the integrity of the World Heritage process risk falling
victim to the politics that for decades have torn the region asunder,
with the Palestinians using their foothold in the U.N. system to grab
symbolic recognition of their elusive bid for statehood in a
long-disputed land.
The World Heritage candidacy of the Church of the Nativity and the
pilgrimage route is one way for the Palestinians to prove they are
responsible stewards of the site which draws tourists the world over.
Above all, it is part of a broader attempt by Palestinian President
Mahmoud Abbas to seek international recognition for a state of
Palestine after its controversial backdoor entry into the U.N. system.
Negotiations with Israel on the terms of a Palestinian state have been
frozen since 2008, mainly because Abbas and Israel's hardline prime
minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, have failed to reach enough common
ground for meaningful talks.
Meantime, Abbas has tried to create new leverage, including with a
quest for U.N. membership for a state of Palestine in the West Bank,
Gaza and east Jerusalem, the territories Israel occupied in 1967. The
U.N. bid has been stalled for months, but Abbas hopes to garner
recognition for Palestine wherever possible, including with a nod from
UNESCO for Bethlehem.
Angry at Palestinian membership in UNESCO, the United States pulled
its $80 million in annual dues 22 percent of the overall budget from
the Paris-based organization after the October vote that made the
Palestinians the 195th member.
Bucking the bad feedback, the Palestinians refused to follow UNESCO
custom and withdraw the candidacy as the French did with their
emergency bid for the Chauvet cave, with its hundreds of prehistoric
drawings, when it got a negative recommendation from the experts.
The Palestinians now risk losing face at the World Heritage Committee
meeting from Sunday until July 6 in Saint Petersburg, Russia, when 33
sites from around the world will be considered for the coveted World
Heritage status.
A surprise thumbs up could feed rancor and rivalries in a volatile
region, within the church itself and perhaps at the U.N. Educational,
Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Already, the Palestinian ambassador to UNESCO, Elias Sanbar, has
denounced a "persistent campaign of rumors" at the organization.
Protecting the cultures of the world is among UNESCO's core missions
and there is little doubt the Church of the Nativity with a
longstanding problem of leaks from the roof is in need of repair. A
program administered by the Palestinians is already in progress.
Located in the Israeli-controlled West Bank, it is managed by three
churches, each jealous of its role as custodian of the site, defined
under an agreement dating back to the Ottoman Empire.
With a big measure of diplomacy, the leaders of the Greek Orthodox,
Catholic and Armenian churches rebuffed the Palestinian proposal,
politely reserving judgment on its reasons.
"In our opinion, we do not think it opportune to deal with this
request that the Basilica and its entire complex be included in the
list of World Heritage sites, due to different considerations," read a
letter to Palestinian Authority Mahmoud Abbas signed by the three
leaders. A copy of the letter was obtained by The Associated Press.
Among other things, a World Heritage designation raises fears that the
delicate arrangement of custodianship might be disturbed. Fights among
priests using broomsticks have been known to break out in the past
over a perception that boundaries are being overstepped.
"When it comes to the Church of the Nativity, no one can interfere,"
said Yousef Daher of the World Council of Churches in Jerusalem. "They
(the Palestinian Authority) figured it wrong." He called the
Palestinian bid a "surprising request."
"A church is a church, it shouldn't become a world heritage. It's a
sacred place and its ownership is not for anyone," Daher said.
The Palestinian emergency application cites lack of regular
restoration on the church due to the political situation since 1967
when Israel occupied the territories and difficulties procuring
equipment because of lack of free movement imposed by Israeli forces.
Though Israel captured the West Bank, it turned much of Bethlehem over
to the Palestinian Authority in the 1990s.
The U.S. State Department did not hide its disapproval of the
Palestinians' emergency bid.
"We are disappointed by the Palestinians' intention to push through an
emergency inscription against the recommendation of UNESCO's own
experts and without thoroughly consulting all stakeholders," a
statement said. It made clear that Washington's objection stems from
the rush job that an emergency candidacy implies and which prevents a
full review including by those with a stake in the outcome.
"We hope the Committee will act responsibly as good stewards of the
World Heritage Convention, rather than allowing yet another U.N. forum
to become a victim of politicization," the U.S. statement said. "The
site is sacred to all Christians."
An experts report, conducted for UNESCO by the Rome-based
International Council on Monuments and Sites, which reviews all
applications, concluded that the Palestinians failed to show that
damage or dangers to the Church of the Nativity "make its condition an
emergency that needs to be addressed ... for immediate action
necessary for the survival of the property."
It suggests the application be resubmitted under normal procedures
with fuller detail. That takes about 18 months, meaning it could be
re-nominated in 2014.
"Palestinians are continuing with their bid, and they are still
hopeful and optimistic that they will succeed," said Palestinian
government spokesman Ghassan Khatib. He declined to elaborate.
The Palestinian delegation to UNESCO refused any comment until after
the Saint Petersburg meeting. However, a letter circulating among
delegations suggested a plot was afoot.
In a letter, Ambassador Sanbar denounced a campaign of pressure
against the bid from "those who do not want to see Palestine exercise
its legitimate rights."
The June 11 letter, a copy of which was obtained by The Associated
Press, included what is purported to be a statement of support for
Palestinian leader Abbas signed in type by the Roman Catholic and
Greek Orthodox leaders, noting the Armenian was absent.
That letter "gave some delegations the impression that the churches
had changed their opinion and were no longer opposed to the
inscription," said one UNESCO official. "Was it designed for that
purpose? I don't know."
The official asked not to be identified because of the sensitivity
surrounding the Palestinian bid.
Despite fears by some that Palestinian backers on the committee will
win the church the emergency designation as an endangered World
Heritage site, others say it would be highly unusual for the voting
committee to ignore the experts' negative recommendation.
"The committee is a sovereign body. Experts are there to give expert
advice that is usually taken on board," said UNESCO spokeswoman Sue
Williams.
Win or lose, the Palestinians are looking to putting their mark on
other sites under their purview, including historic Bethlehem.
That gets a green light from the custodial churches at the Nativity as
long as the church itself stays off limits.
___
Dalia Nammari in Jerusalem and Karin Laub in Ramallah, West Bank
contributed to this report.
Associated Press
http://timesleader.com/stories/Palestinians-push-Nativity-church-as-Heritage-site,167195#ixzz1yhWcsr00
Jun 23
The Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem is becoming the church of
contention, with a bid by the Palestinians to use their position as
the newest members of the U.N.'s cultural arm to obtain World Heritage
status for the iconic Christian site and perhaps boost their own
campaign for legitimacy.
The effort by the Palestinian Authority, like its overall efforts for
global recognition for an independent Palestinian state, is drawing
resistance. And it may fail at the World Heritage Committee meeting
that starts Sunday.
An experts committee has turned down the emergency bid to quickly
confer on the Church of the Nativity, and its pilgrimage route, the
status as an endangered World Heritage site, saying the application
needs more work. Even custodians of the holy site, the Greek Orthodox,
Roman Catholic and Armenian churches are opposed, according to a
document obtained by The Associated Press.
The church which drew some 2 million visitors last year and parts of
which are 1,500 years old stands above the grotto that Christians
believe was the birthplace of Jesus. The Palestinians' application
asks for recognition as a site of "outstanding universal value"
urgently in need of attention.
There is concern by the United States and others that the Bethlehem
holy site and the integrity of the World Heritage process risk falling
victim to the politics that for decades have torn the region asunder,
with the Palestinians using their foothold in the U.N. system to grab
symbolic recognition of their elusive bid for statehood in a
long-disputed land.
The World Heritage candidacy of the Church of the Nativity and the
pilgrimage route is one way for the Palestinians to prove they are
responsible stewards of the site which draws tourists the world over.
Above all, it is part of a broader attempt by Palestinian President
Mahmoud Abbas to seek international recognition for a state of
Palestine after its controversial backdoor entry into the U.N. system.
Negotiations with Israel on the terms of a Palestinian state have been
frozen since 2008, mainly because Abbas and Israel's hardline prime
minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, have failed to reach enough common
ground for meaningful talks.
Meantime, Abbas has tried to create new leverage, including with a
quest for U.N. membership for a state of Palestine in the West Bank,
Gaza and east Jerusalem, the territories Israel occupied in 1967. The
U.N. bid has been stalled for months, but Abbas hopes to garner
recognition for Palestine wherever possible, including with a nod from
UNESCO for Bethlehem.
Angry at Palestinian membership in UNESCO, the United States pulled
its $80 million in annual dues 22 percent of the overall budget from
the Paris-based organization after the October vote that made the
Palestinians the 195th member.
Bucking the bad feedback, the Palestinians refused to follow UNESCO
custom and withdraw the candidacy as the French did with their
emergency bid for the Chauvet cave, with its hundreds of prehistoric
drawings, when it got a negative recommendation from the experts.
The Palestinians now risk losing face at the World Heritage Committee
meeting from Sunday until July 6 in Saint Petersburg, Russia, when 33
sites from around the world will be considered for the coveted World
Heritage status.
A surprise thumbs up could feed rancor and rivalries in a volatile
region, within the church itself and perhaps at the U.N. Educational,
Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Already, the Palestinian ambassador to UNESCO, Elias Sanbar, has
denounced a "persistent campaign of rumors" at the organization.
Protecting the cultures of the world is among UNESCO's core missions
and there is little doubt the Church of the Nativity with a
longstanding problem of leaks from the roof is in need of repair. A
program administered by the Palestinians is already in progress.
Located in the Israeli-controlled West Bank, it is managed by three
churches, each jealous of its role as custodian of the site, defined
under an agreement dating back to the Ottoman Empire.
With a big measure of diplomacy, the leaders of the Greek Orthodox,
Catholic and Armenian churches rebuffed the Palestinian proposal,
politely reserving judgment on its reasons.
"In our opinion, we do not think it opportune to deal with this
request that the Basilica and its entire complex be included in the
list of World Heritage sites, due to different considerations," read a
letter to Palestinian Authority Mahmoud Abbas signed by the three
leaders. A copy of the letter was obtained by The Associated Press.
Among other things, a World Heritage designation raises fears that the
delicate arrangement of custodianship might be disturbed. Fights among
priests using broomsticks have been known to break out in the past
over a perception that boundaries are being overstepped.
"When it comes to the Church of the Nativity, no one can interfere,"
said Yousef Daher of the World Council of Churches in Jerusalem. "They
(the Palestinian Authority) figured it wrong." He called the
Palestinian bid a "surprising request."
"A church is a church, it shouldn't become a world heritage. It's a
sacred place and its ownership is not for anyone," Daher said.
The Palestinian emergency application cites lack of regular
restoration on the church due to the political situation since 1967
when Israel occupied the territories and difficulties procuring
equipment because of lack of free movement imposed by Israeli forces.
Though Israel captured the West Bank, it turned much of Bethlehem over
to the Palestinian Authority in the 1990s.
The U.S. State Department did not hide its disapproval of the
Palestinians' emergency bid.
"We are disappointed by the Palestinians' intention to push through an
emergency inscription against the recommendation of UNESCO's own
experts and without thoroughly consulting all stakeholders," a
statement said. It made clear that Washington's objection stems from
the rush job that an emergency candidacy implies and which prevents a
full review including by those with a stake in the outcome.
"We hope the Committee will act responsibly as good stewards of the
World Heritage Convention, rather than allowing yet another U.N. forum
to become a victim of politicization," the U.S. statement said. "The
site is sacred to all Christians."
An experts report, conducted for UNESCO by the Rome-based
International Council on Monuments and Sites, which reviews all
applications, concluded that the Palestinians failed to show that
damage or dangers to the Church of the Nativity "make its condition an
emergency that needs to be addressed ... for immediate action
necessary for the survival of the property."
It suggests the application be resubmitted under normal procedures
with fuller detail. That takes about 18 months, meaning it could be
re-nominated in 2014.
"Palestinians are continuing with their bid, and they are still
hopeful and optimistic that they will succeed," said Palestinian
government spokesman Ghassan Khatib. He declined to elaborate.
The Palestinian delegation to UNESCO refused any comment until after
the Saint Petersburg meeting. However, a letter circulating among
delegations suggested a plot was afoot.
In a letter, Ambassador Sanbar denounced a campaign of pressure
against the bid from "those who do not want to see Palestine exercise
its legitimate rights."
The June 11 letter, a copy of which was obtained by The Associated
Press, included what is purported to be a statement of support for
Palestinian leader Abbas signed in type by the Roman Catholic and
Greek Orthodox leaders, noting the Armenian was absent.
That letter "gave some delegations the impression that the churches
had changed their opinion and were no longer opposed to the
inscription," said one UNESCO official. "Was it designed for that
purpose? I don't know."
The official asked not to be identified because of the sensitivity
surrounding the Palestinian bid.
Despite fears by some that Palestinian backers on the committee will
win the church the emergency designation as an endangered World
Heritage site, others say it would be highly unusual for the voting
committee to ignore the experts' negative recommendation.
"The committee is a sovereign body. Experts are there to give expert
advice that is usually taken on board," said UNESCO spokeswoman Sue
Williams.
Win or lose, the Palestinians are looking to putting their mark on
other sites under their purview, including historic Bethlehem.
That gets a green light from the custodial churches at the Nativity as
long as the church itself stays off limits.
___
Dalia Nammari in Jerusalem and Karin Laub in Ramallah, West Bank
contributed to this report.
Associated Press