Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

West Not Interested In Establishing Democracy In Armenia

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • West Not Interested In Establishing Democracy In Armenia

    WEST NOT INTERESTED IN ESTABLISHING DEMOCRACY IN ARMENIA
    by Armen Bagdasaryan

    168 Zham, Armenia
    Dec 14 2006

    "We received 0.6 per cent of challenges"

    So, the first batch of 236m dollars - 1.4m dollars - will be
    transferred to Armenia under the Millennium Challenge programme by
    the end of the year. Representatives of the Millennium Challenge
    programme have said that if the parliamentary and presidential
    elections in Armenia in 2007 and 2008 do not meet democratic norms,
    they may revise their decision and stop transferring the money.

    But this does not mean that the Armenian authorities will do everything
    possible to hold the forthcoming election as required.

    Everything will take place according to the scenarios of the previous
    election, though some technologies of fraud may be changed. Why?

    Despite everything, the Millennium Challenge will undoubtedly give
    this money to Armenia and the Armenian authorities are well aware
    of this. But the problem is that the West is not concerned about
    the democracy level in Armenia. Of course, they pretend that this is
    very important for them, but actually they do not care about whether
    Armenia is a democratic state or a dictatorship. Certainly, this does
    not mean that democracy is not important for the West. It is important,
    but only in the case of the states which threaten the security of the
    West. For instance, it is very important for the West that democracy is
    established in Russia, China and Iran. And this is clear as democratic
    societies are the most predictable ones. In other words, if a state
    is democratic, it may not be dangerous for the West any longer.

    Armenia is not on the list of these states, as it has neither energy
    resources nor a nuclear weapon, and it is not on an important
    transport crossroads. Armenia can be dangerous for the West only
    because of one index: if social plight worsens in Armenia much,
    thousands of refugees will leave for Europe and the USA. Thus, the
    West does not have a task of democratization in Armenia but that of
    "poverty alleviation". People should have something to eat so that
    they do not crowd Europe or break the calm of the "old world".

    For several decades the West has been acting in this way: it is
    cheaper for them to "overcome poverty" in the countries of the third
    world than to bear migrants from these countries. In this case their
    states will be preserved "clean"; especially as terrorist movements
    are usually formed in poorer states. For this reason, they allocate
    money for poverty alleviation especially in rural districts as people
    emigrate chiefly form these districts.

    This does not at all mean that we cannot develop the country with
    the help of the money given by the Millennium Challenge. We should
    simply understand that nevertheless, the strengthening of democracy
    and liberalization of economy are the most tested ways for fighting
    poverty and developing the economy and that sums from "aside" can
    only promote this.

    Anyway, even if the authorities understand that the Millennium
    Challenge money will reach Armenia, this does not at all mean that
    they should hold the forthcoming election just in the same way as
    the previous ones. Finally, the West is not obliged to think about
    our future.
Working...
X