Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Turkey policy towards Christian minorities unchanged over 200 years

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Turkey policy towards Christian minorities unchanged over 200 years

    Hilda Tchoboyan: Turkey's policy towards Christian minorities unchanged over
    200 years
    Editorial


    Yerkir.am
    April 01, 2007


    Following Armenian National Committee of America the European Armenian
    Federation (EAFJD) is considered as one of the most influential
    lobbying Armenian organizations. The `Hay Dat' European Committee
    struggles not only for Armenian Genocide recognition, but also for
    settlement of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict proceeding from the right
    of NKR people to self-determination. EAFJD Chairman Hilda Tchoboyan
    answers the questions of PanARMENIAN.Net.

    Judging from media Turkey activated his struggle against recognition
    of the Armenian Genocide not only in the United States, but also in
    Europe. What does Turkey fear so much? The problem of recognizing the
    Armenian Genocide is within Turkey himself, in the Turkish society. If
    this country recognizes the Armenian Genocide it will cease to exist
    as a state. The whole world will look at Turkey as a state, which
    committed a genocide and which is a threat for neighboring countries
    and first of all for Armenia. Much is talked about that the current
    Turkish authorities are not responsible for what happened at the
    beginning of the 20th century, that the Armenian Genocide must be left
    for historians to discuss. But it is a wrong viewpoint. The `Hay Dat'
    Committees are sure that modern Turkey is the successor of the Ottoman
    Empire since the closest circle of republic's founder Kemal
    Atatürk were those who are guilty in extermination of the
    Armenian nation. And exactly for this Turkey is responsible for the
    Genocide. In fact, Turkey's policy towards national minorities is
    unchangeable over 200 years.

    Can the `Hay Dat' European Office influence on recognition of the
    Armenian Genocide in all European countries, particularly in Germany?
    As you know, exactly Germany is the initiator of adopting a bill on
    criminal punishment for denying all genocides, but there is no mention
    in the document about the Armenian Genocide. We are going to insist on
    the inclusion of the Armenian Genocide in it. The European Committee
    actively cooperates in this issue, we have 12 committees, where
    representatives of various nationalities are included and our goal is
    recognition and prevention of genocides. I'll underline that in this
    case the problem is not with Germany, which is for adoption of this
    law, but in the general mood in EU countries. Hearings are scheduled
    for May 19 in the European Parliament, and if the bill is approved it
    will mean that it is compulsory for all EU member-states after
    bringing it in accordance with national legislation of every
    country. The `Hay Dat' Committees must carry out a work aimed at
    recognition of the Armenian Genocide by parliaments of various
    countries. If it happens, as a result the Armenian Genocide will be
    recognized by the international community. The Armenian Genocide was
    the first in the 20th century but for some reasons the attention of
    the world community is concentrated on the Holocaust¦ Not the world
    community, but Jews themselves are sure in it. They consider
    themselves as a nation chosen by God and state that nobody but
    themselves has undergone extermination. It is an ultimately wrong
    introduction of problem. Jewish communities of Europe have begun to
    approach to this understanding. They excellently realize that if an
    estimation was given to the Armenian Genocide in due time, the
    Holocaust may happen, but not in such scales.

    It is considered that the `Hay Dat' Committees are busy only with the
    Armenian Genocide issue. Is it so? `Hay Dat' is busy with
    pan-Armenian national problems, among which the problem of the Nagorno
    Karabakh conflict occupies a particular place. If you remember, some
    years ago reports of the Council of Europe (CoE) on the Nagorno
    Karabakh conflict were ultimately one-sided, the Azeri viewpoint
    prevailed there. By the efforts of the European Office, particularly
    works in the CoE structures we could reach our goal and now reports
    carry more balanced character. Particularly, earlier they used to
    talk only about Azeri refugees. After our statements and explanations
    reports began to include also situation with Armenian refugees from
    Azerbaijan and occupied districts of Nagorno Karabakh. We think that
    we must speak about everyone. And the fact that Baku holds his
    refugees in tent villages for more than 15 years does not do him
    credits.

    How did the Diaspora reacted to the Dual citizenship law? The
    Diaspora waited for the law of Dual Citizenship in Armenia a long
    time. When Armenia's independence was declared a lot of us hoped that
    the Armenia government will recognize us as his own
    citizens. Unfortunately it did not happen. The Diaspora was very
    upset. And now we got moral satisfaction, we have a motherland where
    we can come and do everything possible for her prosperity. It is
    natural the fear of `local' citizens of the RA that the Diaspora will
    take the power into its hands, elect the president and so on. We are
    not going to do that, the law clearly indicates our rights and
    obligations. I consider the adoption of this law as very important,
    even if it is a bit belated step.
Working...
X