Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What do we lose by leaving the Anti-Defamation League?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • What do we lose by leaving the Anti-Defamation League?

    Editorial: What do we lose by leaving the Anti-Defamation League?

    GateHouse News Service
    Thu Sep 20, 2007, 06:00 AM EDT

    Lexington -

    This Friday, Lexington's No Place for Hate steering committee will
    host its first official meeting since August, when Watertown severed
    its ties with No Place for Hate, a program sponsored by the
    Anti-Defamation League (ADL), over the league's ambiguous position on
    the World War I-era massacre of 1.5 million Armenians in present-day
    Turkey.

    Since then Arlington, Belmont, and other Massachusetts communities
    have suspended or nullified their involvement in the No Place for Hate
    program.

    The Lexington committee will meet this week with representatives of
    Lexington's Armenian population, who have asked the town also cut its
    ties with the ADL. While there are benefits to the association with
    the ADL, it doesn't need that association to be effective.

    The No Place for Hate committee is most effective on the local,
    grassroots level. It can continue that without the troubling
    association with the ADL.

    Lexington's No Place for Hate group started eight years ago. Its
    steering committee is a dynamic mix of lay leaders, clergy, elected
    officials and residents. Lexington was one of the first communities to
    participate in the program, according to Jill Smilow, chairman of
    Lexington's No Place for Hate committee.

    It has helped secure about $7,000 in grants for diversity training
    workshops, civil discourse training and programs recognizing Martin
    Luther King Jr. Day. Each year, the Lexington steering committee
    participates in a regional conference of No Place for Hate groups,
    allowing it to hear about regional issues.

    Smilow said its agenda is to be sure everyone has a voice. It has held
    study circles to address challenges and issues specific to Lexington
    and its ability to foster and promote dialogue within town is
    paramount to its value here. It also provides a somewhat intimate
    forum for people from all walks of life - a police chief, a minister,
    a selectman, a housewife - to share ideas and talk about the issues of
    the day.

    It is in this local role that No Place for Hate serves the town best.
    Its inclusive, non-partisan forum fills a communication hole left when
    regular folks are too busy or too timid to bring social issues to the
    forefront of Lexington's larger committees, or Board of Selectmen, or
    Town Meeting. It has a more active role in promoting tolerance than
    other groups handling the myriad issues expected of government.

    Speaking just for herself, Smilow said the fact there was genocide is
    "unequivocal." But Smilow, an active member of the regional ADL, says
    there is value in remaining with the ADL's network and the best way to
    affect change is to remain within its ranks.

    Lexington's very lucky to have her working to achieve that. It does
    not, however, need the entire committee to remain with the group in
    order to accomplish this. By not suspending its involvement or cutting
    it completely, the No Place for Hate committee could promote the type
    of rift in town it is supposed to prevent.

    Source: http://www.townonline.com/lexington/opinions/x4283 62979
Working...
X