Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Breakaway state still struggling for recognition

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Breakaway state still struggling for recognition

    Washington Times, DC
    Sept 30 2007


    Breakaway state still struggling for recognition

    By Levon Sevunts
    September 30, 2007


    STEPANAKERT, Nagorno-Karabakh

    Even if a draft law forcing the government of Armenia to recognize
    the independence of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic is rejected by the
    Armenian parliament, residents of this breakaway republic say they
    will continue their struggle for international recognition.

    Populated mostly by Armenians this lush mountainous region, slightly
    larger than Rhode Island, broke away from Azerbaijan after a bitter
    war between 1990 and 1994.

    Nagorno-Karabakh Armenians, supported by their brethren in Armenia,
    emerged victorious from a bloody conflict that killed more than
    35,000 people on both sides.

    The Nagorno-Karabakh Republic formally declared its independence in
    1992. At the time, many critics dismissed the move as a shrewd
    political maneuver by Armenians - who were starting to win the war -
    to deflect international criticism from Armenia proper.

    Today, Karabakh possesses almost all the trappings of a state. It has
    its own flag and its own army. It issues entry visas to foreign
    visitors and its residents regularly vote in elections to all levels
    of government.

    But Nagorno-Karabakh's de facto independence hasn't been recognized
    by any country, not even its closest ally: Armenia.

    And Armenian authorities have made it clear they have no plans to
    recognize the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic as an independent state
    despite pressure from a major opposition party.

    "The recognition of Nagorno-Karabakh by Armenia has always been and
    remains in Armenia's diplomatic arsenal," Vladimir Karapetian, a
    spokesman for the Armenian Foreign Affairs Ministry, told Radio Free
    Europe/Radio Liberty. "That must come at a time when it can be
    maximally effective and can help achieve a lasting resolution. That
    time has not yet come," he said.

    These comments came in response to a draft law circulated in late
    August by Raffi Hovannisian, the U.S.-born leader of the opposition
    Zharangutyun (Heritage) party and Armenia's former foreign affairs
    minister. The bill would have forced the Armenian government to
    officially recognize Karabakh's independence. However, fearing that
    such a drastic move could derail the fragile peace process, the
    pro-government factions in the parliament and another opposition
    party rejected the bill.

    Yet many residents of Nagorno-Karabakh say they'll persevere, hoping
    the international community will one day recognize their
    independence.

    "You know a lot of countries haven't been recognized but people still
    live in these countries," said Karina Sarkissian, a retired
    accountant. "But still we're hoping that one day the international
    community will recognize us. We are peaceful people, like every
    normal people anywhere else in the world we want peace, we want to
    raise our children in peace."

    Fifteen years of de facto sovereignty have also produced a tectonic
    shift in popular attitudes toward independence of Nagorno-Karabakh,
    both from Azerbaijan and Armenia.

    Twenty years ago, Karlen Avanessian dreamed of reunification with
    Armenia.

    In February of 1988, he was one of the activists who went door to
    door to gather signatures for a petition asking the Soviet Politburo
    to transfer authority over the Armenian-populated Nagorno-Karabakh
    from Azerbaijan to Armenia.

    Two years later, when the confrontation with Azerbaijan degenerated
    into a vicious war, he picked up a gun to defend his family and fight
    for his dream, said Mr. Avanessian, a 66-year-old former
    welder-turned-shopkeeper at Stepanakert's main bazaar.

    But if a referendum on the status of Nagorno-Karabakh were held
    today, Mr. Avanessian said he'd vote for full independence, not a
    union with Armenia.

    "We want to have our own, separate Armenian state, a small state, but
    our own state," said Mr. Avanessian as neighboring shopkeepers nodded
    in agreement. "For seventy years, thanks to a decree by Lenin,
    Karabakh was made part of Azerbaijan. But for centuries Karabakh was
    an independent state. Now the international community wants to
    remember those 70 years and forget about the centuries we were
    independent."

    Only his neighbor to the right, a settler from Armenia proper,
    disagreed.

    "Uncle Karlen, you can't say things like that, we have to have one
    unified Armenian state," she said. But she was in the minority. As
    the resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict has dragged on for
    almost two decades, many in this breakaway republic have come to
    realize their dream of reunification with "Mother Armenia" might
    never happen.

    But independence is a different matter. It's seen by many as more
    acceptable to the international community. And Western designs for
    Kosovo's independence are seen as setting a precedent for Karabakh's
    eventual international recognition.

    Thus, despite close political, economic and military ties with
    Armenia - Nagorno-Karabakh uses Armenian currency, the dram,
    Armenia's current president, Robert Kocharian, is the former
    president of Nagorno-Karabakh - independence has become the preferred
    option for many Karabakh Armenians.

    And they see democracy as the ticket to international recognition of
    Karabakh's de facto independence.

    Sergei Markedonov, a prominent Caucasus specialist from the Institute
    of Political and Military Analysis, an independent Russian think
    tank, said promoting democracy in Nagorno-Karabakh provides not only
    for a sustainable and self-sufficient form of government, but also an
    effective instrument for its campaign of international recognition.

    Since Nagorno-Karabakh started its campaign of independence in the
    late eighties, Mr. Markedonov said, it has conducted three successful
    presidential election campaigns, parliamentary elections, and three
    campaigns of local self-government elections.

    These elections have been officially rejected as illegitimate by the
    international community, which stresses that without the
    participation of the Azeri population of Nagorno-Karabakh, driven out
    during the war, no election can be considered fully democratic.

    Despite this international criticism, Nagorno-Karabakh compares
    favorably to Azerbaijan, where the current president, Ilham Aliev,
    "inherited" power from his late father Geidar Aliev, Mr. Markedonov
    said.

    "I think those democratic tendencies could not be ignored by the
    West," he said. "Now Azerbaijan can be characterized as a 'soft
    sultanate,' where power was passed from father to son. In many cases
    Azeri leaders appeal to Nagorno-Karabakh as the primordial territory
    of Azerbaijan, but are they ready to guarantee high standards of
    democracy for the Armenian population?" Mr. Markedonov said the
    question of "democracy gap" between Azerbaijan and Nagorno-Karabakh
    will be raised during any final-status negotiations and be used by
    the Armenian side as another argument against the rebel territory's
    reintegration with Azerbaijan.

    "We have to compare democratic standards in Nagorno-Karabakh and in
    Azerbaijan," Mr. Markedonov said. "And we have to understand that the
    liquidation of Nagorno-Karabakh would mean the liquidation of
    democracy here."


    Photos at
    http://washingtontimes.com/article/20070930/FOR EIGN/109300034/1003
Working...
X