Tweet
PRESIDENT AL-ASSAD TO FRANCE 2 TV: FRANCE WAS A SPEARHEAD IN SUPPORTING TERRORISM… WE ARE READY FOR ANY DIALOGUE THAT MEETS SYRIANS’ INTERESTS
[ Part 2.2: "Attached Text" ]
21/04/2015
1
Damascus, SANA-President Bashar al-Assad gave an interview to France
2 TV.
Following is the full text;
Question 1: Good evening, Mr. President, I’d like to start
straight forward. For most French, you are in a very large part
responsible for the chaos going on in Syria, because of the brutality
of the repression during the last four years. According to you,
what is your part of responsibility?
President Assad: Actually, since the first few weeks of the conflict,
the terrorists infiltrated the situation in Syria with the support of
Western countries and regional countries, and they started attacking
the civilians and destroying public places, public properties and
private properties, and that’s documented on the internet, by
them, not by us. So, our role as government is to defend our society
and our citizens. If you want to say what you said is correct after
four years, how could a government or president that’s been
brutal with his population, killing them, and with the support from
the other side of the greatest countries and political powers in
the world, with the petrodollars in our region… how could he
withstand for four years? Is it possible to have the support of your
public while you are brutal with your public?
Question 2: In the beginning, there were tens of thousands of people
in the street. Were they all jihadists?
President Assad: No, definitely not. But the other question is,
if in the sixth day of the conflict, the first Syrian policeman was
killed… how? By the peaceful demonstration? By the audio waves
of the demonstrators? How? He’s been killed by terrorists.
Somebody who took a gun and shot that policeman, so he’s a
terrorist. It doesn’t matter if he’s a jihadist or not,
because he killed a policeman.
Question 3: There were perhaps jihadists or terrorists, but our
reporters were there at the beginning and they met a lot of people
saying “we want more freedom, more democracy.” They
weren’t terrorists or jihadists.
Every government should support freedom under the constitution
2
President Assad: Definitely, everybody has the right to ask for his
freedom, and every government should support freedom, of course, under
the constitution. But does freedom mean to kill the civilians, to kill
policemen, to destroy the schools, the hospitals, the electricity, the
infrastructure? That’s not owned by the government; it’s
owned by the Syrian people. It’s not owned by us, it’s
not owned by me. Is that the freedom that you’re talking about?
ISIS was created in Iraq in 2006 under the supervision of the Americans
Question 4: A lot of analysts and a lot of journalists say that you
have helped ISIS to emerge, because it’s an opportunity for
you to appear like a shield.
President Assad: But ISIS was created in Iraq in 2006 under
the supervision of the Americans. I’m not in Iraq and I
wasn’t in Iraq. I wasn’t controlling Iraq. The Americans
controlled Iraq, and ISIS came from Iraq to Syria, because chaos is
contagious. When you have chaos at your neighborhood, you have to
expect it in your area.
Question 5: But the word ISIS at the beginning…
President Assad: Let me continue. Whenever you have chaos in a certain
country, this is a fertile soil for the terrorists to come.
So, when there is chaos in Syria, ISIS came to Syria. Before ISIS
came al-Nusra Front, which is al-Qaeda, and before that you had the
Muslim Brotherhood. They all represent the same grassroots for ISIS
to come later.
Question 6: So you have no responsibility at all for what happened
since the last years in Syria?
President Assad: Normally, things are not absolute. To have
no responsibility is not precise, because everybody has a
responsibility. We have our own problems in Syria. The government is
responsible, every one of us is responsible, every Syrian citizen is
responsible, but now I’m talking about what brought ISIS here:
the chaos, and your government, the government - or if you want to
call it regime - the French regime, as they call us, is responsible
for supporting those jihadists that they called moderate opposition.
Question 7: France is supporting a coalition, national Syrian
coalition. Are they terrorists?
President Assad: The people who are supported now, who have Western
armaments, they became ISIS, they were supported by your state, and
by other Western states, by armaments, and that was announced by your
Defense Minister. He announced it at the beginning of this year;
he said we sent armaments. So, those people you called moderate,
in 2012 before the rise of ISIS and before the West acknowledged the
existence of al-Qaeda faction which is al-Nusra, they published videos
where they eat the heart of a Syrian soldier, where they dismember
other victims, and where they behead others. They published it, we
didn’t. So, how can you ignore this reality, that they want to
publish it, and tell you this is the fact?
Question 8: Let’s talk about the present. It appears that the
Syrian army continues to utilize indiscriminate weapons like barrel
bombs, which have devastating effects on civilians. Why don’t
you change this strategy?
President Assad: We never heard in our army of indiscriminate killing
weapons, because no army, including our army, will accept to use
weaponry that doesn’t aim, because it will be of no use. You
can’t use it, I mean from a military point of view. This is
first. Second, when you want to talk about indiscriminate killing,
it’s not about the weapon; it’s about the way you use it,
and the proof of that is the drones, the American drones in Pakistan
and Afghanistan, they killed more civilians than terrorists. They are
the highest precision weapon in the world. So, it’s not about
the kind of bomb. We have regular bombs, regular armaments.
Question 9: You don’t use barrel bombs?
President Assad: What is a barrel bomb? Can you tell me what it is?
Question 10: There are several documents, videos, and photographs
like this, where you see a barrel bomb dropped by helicopters. This
is Aleppo, this is Hama a few months ago, one year ago. Only Syrian
army has helicopters, so what can you answer?
President Assad: This is not proof. These are two pictures of two
things. No one can link them to each other.
Question 11: Aleppo, Hama.
3
President Assad: No, no. This picture that you mentioned here, what
is it? I have never seen such a thing in our army. I’m not
talking about the helicopters, I’m talking about two pictures.
How can you relate between the two?
Question 12: You say it’s a fake? It’s a false document?
President Assad: No, no, it has to be verified, but in our army we
only use regular bombs that could be aimed. So, we don’t have
any armament that could be shelled indiscriminately. That’s it.
The war in Syria is about winning the hearts of the people, it’s
not about killing people
Question 13: But this helicopter, only the Syrian army has helicopters.
President Assad: Yes, of course, I didn’t say we didn’t
have helicopters, that we don’t use it. I’m talking
about the armaments. They aim to target the terrorists. Why to kill
indiscriminately? Why to kill the civilians? The war in Syria is
about winning the hearts of the people, it’s not about killing
people. If you kill people, you cannot be in your position, as a
government, or as president. It’s impossible.
Question 14: What about chemical weapons? You committed two years ago
not to use chemical weapons. Did you use chlorine gas in the battle
of Idleb last month?
President Assad: No, this is another fake narrative by the Western
governments. Why? Because we have two factories of chlorine. One
of them is closed for a few years now, it’s not used anyway,
and the other one is in the northern part in Syria, which is the
most important factory than the first one. It’s on the Turkish
border, it’s under the control of the terrorists for two years,
and we sent formal documents to the United Nations regarding that
factory. They wanted to come and they sent us a formal response, they
couldn’t reach it. So, the chlorine in Syria is under the control
of the rebels. This is first. Second, this is not a WMD, it’s
not a weapon of mass destruction. The regular armaments that we have
are more influential than chlorine, so we don’t need it anyway.
Question 15: But there are investigations, you must have seen that,
from HRW, about last month in Idleb. Three attacks with chlorine smell,
with symptoms consistent with exposure to toxic gas, that is what
was concluded this investigation. These three attacks took place in
territory controlled by armed opposition groups. HRW, are they liars?
President Assad: We didn’t use it. We don’t need to use
it. We have our regular armaments, and we could achieve our goals
without it. So, we don’t use it. No, there’s no proof.
Question 16: There are witnesses, there are testimonies of doctors.
President Assad: No, no. We ask, in every allegation regarding the
chemical weapons in the past, in the present, we were the party
who asked the international institutions to send delegations for
investigations. We are, not the opposite, actually. And our soldiers
were exposed to sarine gas two years ago, and we invited the United
Nations to make investigations. How could we invite them while we
are using them? That’s neither true nor reasonable.
Question 17: Are you ready to invite them again, on Idleb?
President Assad: We already did. We always invite. We don’t
have a problem with that.
Question 18: Now, an international coalition led by the U.S. is bombing
ISIS from the air. Is it a problem for you, or is it help for you?
President Assad: It’s neither, none of them. Because it’s
not a problem of course if you attack terrorists, but at the same time,
if you’re not serious, you don’t help us.
Question 19: Why not serious?
4
President Assad: If you want to make a comparison between the number of
air raids of the coalition of 60 countries, while we are one country,
a small country, what we do is tenfold, sometimes, than what they
do in one day. IS that serious? It took them to liberate what they
call in the media Kobani city, on the Turkish borders, it took them
four months to liberate it, in spite of having Syrian fighters on the
ground. So, they’re not serious so far. And the other proof is
that ISIS has expanded in Syria, in Iraq, in Libya, in the region in
general. So, how can you say that it was effective?
They’re not serious, that’s why they don’t make
any help to anyone in this region.
Question 20: There have been thousands of strikes of coalition in
the beginning, but France only is striking in Iraq. Would you like
France to join the coalition to strike in Syria?
The coalition against terrorism cannot be formed by countries who
support terrorists
President Assad: As I said, they’re not serious anyway. The
coalition against terrorism cannot be formed by countries who support
the terrorists at the same time, so we don’t care whether
they attack it in Syria, or Iraq, or both, as long as they support
the same terrorists at the same time. They send weapons to the same
terrorists under the title of moderate opposition when Obama said
it’s elusive, so the armaments will actually go to whom? To
the terrorists. So, this is contradiction. It doesn’t work.
Question 21: You have the same enemy with France: ISIS. There have been
attacks in France in January. For that moment, did your intelligence
service have contact with French intelligence services?
President Assad: There are some contacts, but there’s no
cooperation.
Question 22: What do you mean by contacts?
President Assad: We met with them, we met with some of your security
officials, but there’s no cooperation.
Question 23: No exchange of information?
President Assad: No, nothing at all.
Question 24: So, why did you meet them?
President Assad: They came to Syria, we didn’t go to France.
They came, maybe for some exchange of information, but when you want
to have this kind of cooperation, it’s a two-directions way,
so it’s about we help them, they help us. Now, according to
the reality that’s related to your politics or to the policy
of the French government, we should help them, while they support
the terrorists and kill our people, so it doesn’t work.
Question 25: Did France ask for contact with your intelligence
services?
President Assad: Yes, we met with them. There was a meeting with them.
Question 26: It was France asking?
President Assad: Yes. We don’t have anything to ask from the
French intelligence. We have all the information about the terrorists.
Question 27: There are hundreds of French fighting with ISIS in
Syria. Did you arrest some of them? Are there some French people from
ISIS now in Syrian jails?
President Assad: No, in the prisons we don’t have any of them,
we only have information, because the majority of those jihadists,
they come here to fight and to die and to go to Heaven, that’s
their ideology. So they’re not ready to go to any prison.
Question 28: So, there are none in jail?
President Assad: No, in jail we don’t have any of them.
Question 29: There are some people nowadays in France, some
politicians, some MPs, you have received some of them these last days,
they say that it’s time to dialogue with you. What initiative
would you be ready to take to convince the others that you can become
a partner for dialogue?
President Assad: With them?
Question 30: With France.
5
President Assad: They have to convince me first, that they don’t
support terrorists, that they are not involved in the blood shedding
of the Syrian people first. They made the mistake regarding Syria,
we didn’t kill any French or European people.
We didn’t help terrorists in your country. We didn’t
help the Charlie Hebdo. You helped the terrorists, so your country,
Western officials, should convince us that they don’t
support terrorists. But we are ready for any dialogue, taking into
consideration that it’s going to be for the interest of the
Syrian citizens.
How can we make dialogue with a regime that supports terrorists in
our country?
Question 31: So at this moment, you are not interested in dialogue
with France.
President Assad: No, we are always interested in dialogue with anyone,
but that is based on the policy. How can we make dialogue with a
regime that supports terrorists in our country, and what for?
That’s the question. When they change their policy, we’ll
be ready to make dialogue, but without that policy, there’s
no aim for the dialogue. You don’t make dialogue for the sake
of dialogue; you make it in order to reach certain results, and that
result for me is for this government to stop supporting the terrorists
in my country.
Question 32: So, you would have no message to send to Francois Hollande
in the objective of dialogue?
President Assad: I think the main message that should be sent to him
is by the French people, and the poll in France will tell you what
message Hollande should listen to, which is, as the most unpopular
president in the history of France since the 50s, should take care of
his population and prevent terrorists from coming to France. For me,
as somebody who suffering with his citizens, with the other citizens
in Syria, from terrorists, I think the most important message is what
you’ve been seeing in France is only the tip of the iceberg.
When you talk about terrorism, you have a full mountain under the
sea. Be aware of this mountain that will inflict your society.
Question 33: When John Kerry, the United States, said perhaps we will
have dialogue with Mr. Bashar Assad, with President Assad, after he
came back to another position, but you said ok, these are words, I want
acts, I’m ready for dialogue. So, you are ready for dialogue?
France is the spearhead that supports terrorism in Syria
President Assad: Of course, we are ready. I said we are ready, with
every country in this world, including the great powers in the world,
including France. But I said dialogue should be based on a certain
policy. The spearhead against Syria, the spearhead that supports
terrorism in Syria, was first France, second UK, not the US this
time. Obama acknowledged that the moderate opposition is illusive..
he said that it is fantasy.
Question 34: He said it’s a phantasm to think that we could
arm them and they could win the war, but he didn’t say there
were no moderate opposition.
President Assad: Exactly. What’s the meaning of “we could
arm them and they couldn’t win the war?” What does it
mean? What does fantasy mean? They said they’re going to arm
the moderate opposition. Can you tell me what is it, where it is? We
don’t see it. We live in Syria, you live in France. I live
here, I don’t find it to fight it, if we have to fight it. We
don’t find it.
Question 35: You say there are foreign countries, too much foreign
countries, involved in the Syria conflict, but without Iranian support,
without Hezbollah support, would you be able to fight against terrorism
now? I mean, you denounced that foreign countries are involved in
Syria, but on your part there is Iranian and Hezbollah support for you.
President Assad: There’s a big difference between intervention
and invitation. Every country, every government in the world,
every state, has the right to invite any other country or party or
organization to help in any domain, while no country has the right to
intervene without invitation. So, we invited Hezbollah. We didn’t
invite the Iranians, they’re not here, they didn’t send
any troops.
Question 36: There are no Iranians here fighting with you?
President Assad: No, no, they don’t fight. We have regular
relations with Iran for more than three decades. We have commanders,
officers coming and going between the two countries based on the
cooperation that existed between us for a long time. This is different
from fighting. So, we as a government have the right to have such
kind of cooperation, but France and other countries don’t have
the right to support anyone within our country. This is a breach of
the international law, this is a breach of our sovereignty, this a
breach of the values that they’ve been proudly talking about -
or allegedly some of them talk about - for decades now, maybe for
centuries. One of these values is democracy.
Is it democracy to send armaments to terrorists? To support rebels?
Do I have the right to support the terrorists of Charlie Hebdo or
something similar?
Question 37: You know what the French Prime Minister said recently
about you. He said “he’s a butcher.” What’s
your response?
President Assad: First of all, let me be frank with you. The statements
of the officials in France, no-one is taking them seriously now, for
one reason: because France is a satellite somehow to the American
policy in the region. It’s not independent, it doesn’t
have the weight, it doesn’t have the credibility.
This is first. Second, as an official, you always care about the
opinion of the population and Syrain citizens. I’m not made
in France or any other country. I’m here because of the Syrian
citizens, and that’s what you have to take care of.
Question 38: Do you think, one day, you will win this war, and that
everybody, everything will go on like before, and Syria will go like
before, with nothing changed?
President Assad: No, nothing should be as before, because you make
things as before means you didn’t develop, you didn’t
learn from the conflict. This conflict has many lessons. We have to
learn from the lessons, and we have to make things not like before,
but better, and there’s a big difference.
Question 39: And with Bashar Assad ruling Syria?
President Assad: I don’t care about this. I care about what the
Syrian people want. If they want Bashar al-Assad, he will stay. If
they don’t want him, he has to leave right now. I mean, how
can he govern without the support of his public? Can he? He cannot.
Question 40: How can you know that you have the support of your
population?
President Assad: First of all, when you don’t have support,
they won’t support the army, you will not withstand for four
years. How can you withstand without their support?
Question 41: Perhaps they’re scared.
President Assad: They are 23 millions. How can 23 millions be scared
of one person, or one intelligence, or one government? That’s
not realistic, not rational.
Question 42: You think it’s democracy now in Syria? You think
people can really say what they think?
President Assad: No, we were on the way to democracy, it’s a
process, it’s a long way. There’s no place you reach it,
you say this is democracy. If you want to compare me to the West, to
France, and other countries, no, you are much ahead of us, definitely,
because of your history and because of many other circumstances and
factors. If you want to compare me to your closest friend, Saudi
Arabia, of course we are democratic. So, it depends on how you
compare me.
Question 43: If you were convinced that leaving the power would mean
peace for Syria, would you do it?
President Assad: Without hesitation. If that were the case, without
hesitation, I would leave of course. If I’m the reason of
conflict in my country, I shouldn’t be here. That’s
self-evident.
Question 44: I wanted to show you another photograph. This is Gilles
Jacquier. He was a journalist in our channel, France 2. He was
killed here in Syria 3 years ago. You had promised an investigation
about that to know who killed him. What can you tell us about this
investigation today?
President Assad: Regardless of the allegations at that time that
we killed him, he was in a residential area under the control of
the government, and he was killed by a mortar, not by a bullet, so
the self-evident thing is that the government wouldn’t shell
itself or the residential area of its supporters by mortars. So,
it’s very clear, everybody knows, and many French media at the
time acknowledged that he was killed by a mortar that was shelled
by what you call the opposition, actually they are terrorists. So,
he was definitely killed by them, but if you want to about - are you
asking about the investigation?
Question 45: Yes. There has been an investigation? Would you give
the result of this investigation you have to prove for French justice?
President Assad: No, we don’t have to prove. We have legal
procedures, and whenever we have any crime in Syria, we follow these
procedures, like any other country. You have a judicial system in
Syria, you have regular procedures; so if you want to know about the
details, after this interview you can be referred to the involved or
interested institution.
Question 46: And you would ok to give this information to French
justice?
President Assad: Of course, we don’t have any problem.
Question 47: If French justice would like to send investigators here,
policemen, judge, would you be willing to?
President Assad: That depends on the agreement between the two
governments, if you have agreement or, let’s say, a treaty or
such a thing, regarding the judicial systems in the two countries
and the cooperation between these two systems, we don’t have
a problem, but it’s not a political decision.
Question 48: Thank you, Mr. President.
President Assad: Thank you for coming.
http://www.sana.sy/en/?p=37034
[ Part 2.2: "Attached Text" ]
21/04/2015
1
Damascus, SANA-President Bashar al-Assad gave an interview to France
2 TV.
Following is the full text;
Question 1: Good evening, Mr. President, I’d like to start
straight forward. For most French, you are in a very large part
responsible for the chaos going on in Syria, because of the brutality
of the repression during the last four years. According to you,
what is your part of responsibility?
President Assad: Actually, since the first few weeks of the conflict,
the terrorists infiltrated the situation in Syria with the support of
Western countries and regional countries, and they started attacking
the civilians and destroying public places, public properties and
private properties, and that’s documented on the internet, by
them, not by us. So, our role as government is to defend our society
and our citizens. If you want to say what you said is correct after
four years, how could a government or president that’s been
brutal with his population, killing them, and with the support from
the other side of the greatest countries and political powers in
the world, with the petrodollars in our region… how could he
withstand for four years? Is it possible to have the support of your
public while you are brutal with your public?
Question 2: In the beginning, there were tens of thousands of people
in the street. Were they all jihadists?
President Assad: No, definitely not. But the other question is,
if in the sixth day of the conflict, the first Syrian policeman was
killed… how? By the peaceful demonstration? By the audio waves
of the demonstrators? How? He’s been killed by terrorists.
Somebody who took a gun and shot that policeman, so he’s a
terrorist. It doesn’t matter if he’s a jihadist or not,
because he killed a policeman.
Question 3: There were perhaps jihadists or terrorists, but our
reporters were there at the beginning and they met a lot of people
saying “we want more freedom, more democracy.” They
weren’t terrorists or jihadists.
Every government should support freedom under the constitution
2
President Assad: Definitely, everybody has the right to ask for his
freedom, and every government should support freedom, of course, under
the constitution. But does freedom mean to kill the civilians, to kill
policemen, to destroy the schools, the hospitals, the electricity, the
infrastructure? That’s not owned by the government; it’s
owned by the Syrian people. It’s not owned by us, it’s
not owned by me. Is that the freedom that you’re talking about?
ISIS was created in Iraq in 2006 under the supervision of the Americans
Question 4: A lot of analysts and a lot of journalists say that you
have helped ISIS to emerge, because it’s an opportunity for
you to appear like a shield.
President Assad: But ISIS was created in Iraq in 2006 under
the supervision of the Americans. I’m not in Iraq and I
wasn’t in Iraq. I wasn’t controlling Iraq. The Americans
controlled Iraq, and ISIS came from Iraq to Syria, because chaos is
contagious. When you have chaos at your neighborhood, you have to
expect it in your area.
Question 5: But the word ISIS at the beginning…
President Assad: Let me continue. Whenever you have chaos in a certain
country, this is a fertile soil for the terrorists to come.
So, when there is chaos in Syria, ISIS came to Syria. Before ISIS
came al-Nusra Front, which is al-Qaeda, and before that you had the
Muslim Brotherhood. They all represent the same grassroots for ISIS
to come later.
Question 6: So you have no responsibility at all for what happened
since the last years in Syria?
President Assad: Normally, things are not absolute. To have
no responsibility is not precise, because everybody has a
responsibility. We have our own problems in Syria. The government is
responsible, every one of us is responsible, every Syrian citizen is
responsible, but now I’m talking about what brought ISIS here:
the chaos, and your government, the government - or if you want to
call it regime - the French regime, as they call us, is responsible
for supporting those jihadists that they called moderate opposition.
Question 7: France is supporting a coalition, national Syrian
coalition. Are they terrorists?
President Assad: The people who are supported now, who have Western
armaments, they became ISIS, they were supported by your state, and
by other Western states, by armaments, and that was announced by your
Defense Minister. He announced it at the beginning of this year;
he said we sent armaments. So, those people you called moderate,
in 2012 before the rise of ISIS and before the West acknowledged the
existence of al-Qaeda faction which is al-Nusra, they published videos
where they eat the heart of a Syrian soldier, where they dismember
other victims, and where they behead others. They published it, we
didn’t. So, how can you ignore this reality, that they want to
publish it, and tell you this is the fact?
Question 8: Let’s talk about the present. It appears that the
Syrian army continues to utilize indiscriminate weapons like barrel
bombs, which have devastating effects on civilians. Why don’t
you change this strategy?
President Assad: We never heard in our army of indiscriminate killing
weapons, because no army, including our army, will accept to use
weaponry that doesn’t aim, because it will be of no use. You
can’t use it, I mean from a military point of view. This is
first. Second, when you want to talk about indiscriminate killing,
it’s not about the weapon; it’s about the way you use it,
and the proof of that is the drones, the American drones in Pakistan
and Afghanistan, they killed more civilians than terrorists. They are
the highest precision weapon in the world. So, it’s not about
the kind of bomb. We have regular bombs, regular armaments.
Question 9: You don’t use barrel bombs?
President Assad: What is a barrel bomb? Can you tell me what it is?
Question 10: There are several documents, videos, and photographs
like this, where you see a barrel bomb dropped by helicopters. This
is Aleppo, this is Hama a few months ago, one year ago. Only Syrian
army has helicopters, so what can you answer?
President Assad: This is not proof. These are two pictures of two
things. No one can link them to each other.
Question 11: Aleppo, Hama.
3
President Assad: No, no. This picture that you mentioned here, what
is it? I have never seen such a thing in our army. I’m not
talking about the helicopters, I’m talking about two pictures.
How can you relate between the two?
Question 12: You say it’s a fake? It’s a false document?
President Assad: No, no, it has to be verified, but in our army we
only use regular bombs that could be aimed. So, we don’t have
any armament that could be shelled indiscriminately. That’s it.
The war in Syria is about winning the hearts of the people, it’s
not about killing people
Question 13: But this helicopter, only the Syrian army has helicopters.
President Assad: Yes, of course, I didn’t say we didn’t
have helicopters, that we don’t use it. I’m talking
about the armaments. They aim to target the terrorists. Why to kill
indiscriminately? Why to kill the civilians? The war in Syria is
about winning the hearts of the people, it’s not about killing
people. If you kill people, you cannot be in your position, as a
government, or as president. It’s impossible.
Question 14: What about chemical weapons? You committed two years ago
not to use chemical weapons. Did you use chlorine gas in the battle
of Idleb last month?
President Assad: No, this is another fake narrative by the Western
governments. Why? Because we have two factories of chlorine. One
of them is closed for a few years now, it’s not used anyway,
and the other one is in the northern part in Syria, which is the
most important factory than the first one. It’s on the Turkish
border, it’s under the control of the terrorists for two years,
and we sent formal documents to the United Nations regarding that
factory. They wanted to come and they sent us a formal response, they
couldn’t reach it. So, the chlorine in Syria is under the control
of the rebels. This is first. Second, this is not a WMD, it’s
not a weapon of mass destruction. The regular armaments that we have
are more influential than chlorine, so we don’t need it anyway.
Question 15: But there are investigations, you must have seen that,
from HRW, about last month in Idleb. Three attacks with chlorine smell,
with symptoms consistent with exposure to toxic gas, that is what
was concluded this investigation. These three attacks took place in
territory controlled by armed opposition groups. HRW, are they liars?
President Assad: We didn’t use it. We don’t need to use
it. We have our regular armaments, and we could achieve our goals
without it. So, we don’t use it. No, there’s no proof.
Question 16: There are witnesses, there are testimonies of doctors.
President Assad: No, no. We ask, in every allegation regarding the
chemical weapons in the past, in the present, we were the party
who asked the international institutions to send delegations for
investigations. We are, not the opposite, actually. And our soldiers
were exposed to sarine gas two years ago, and we invited the United
Nations to make investigations. How could we invite them while we
are using them? That’s neither true nor reasonable.
Question 17: Are you ready to invite them again, on Idleb?
President Assad: We already did. We always invite. We don’t
have a problem with that.
Question 18: Now, an international coalition led by the U.S. is bombing
ISIS from the air. Is it a problem for you, or is it help for you?
President Assad: It’s neither, none of them. Because it’s
not a problem of course if you attack terrorists, but at the same time,
if you’re not serious, you don’t help us.
Question 19: Why not serious?
4
President Assad: If you want to make a comparison between the number of
air raids of the coalition of 60 countries, while we are one country,
a small country, what we do is tenfold, sometimes, than what they
do in one day. IS that serious? It took them to liberate what they
call in the media Kobani city, on the Turkish borders, it took them
four months to liberate it, in spite of having Syrian fighters on the
ground. So, they’re not serious so far. And the other proof is
that ISIS has expanded in Syria, in Iraq, in Libya, in the region in
general. So, how can you say that it was effective?
They’re not serious, that’s why they don’t make
any help to anyone in this region.
Question 20: There have been thousands of strikes of coalition in
the beginning, but France only is striking in Iraq. Would you like
France to join the coalition to strike in Syria?
The coalition against terrorism cannot be formed by countries who
support terrorists
President Assad: As I said, they’re not serious anyway. The
coalition against terrorism cannot be formed by countries who support
the terrorists at the same time, so we don’t care whether
they attack it in Syria, or Iraq, or both, as long as they support
the same terrorists at the same time. They send weapons to the same
terrorists under the title of moderate opposition when Obama said
it’s elusive, so the armaments will actually go to whom? To
the terrorists. So, this is contradiction. It doesn’t work.
Question 21: You have the same enemy with France: ISIS. There have been
attacks in France in January. For that moment, did your intelligence
service have contact with French intelligence services?
President Assad: There are some contacts, but there’s no
cooperation.
Question 22: What do you mean by contacts?
President Assad: We met with them, we met with some of your security
officials, but there’s no cooperation.
Question 23: No exchange of information?
President Assad: No, nothing at all.
Question 24: So, why did you meet them?
President Assad: They came to Syria, we didn’t go to France.
They came, maybe for some exchange of information, but when you want
to have this kind of cooperation, it’s a two-directions way,
so it’s about we help them, they help us. Now, according to
the reality that’s related to your politics or to the policy
of the French government, we should help them, while they support
the terrorists and kill our people, so it doesn’t work.
Question 25: Did France ask for contact with your intelligence
services?
President Assad: Yes, we met with them. There was a meeting with them.
Question 26: It was France asking?
President Assad: Yes. We don’t have anything to ask from the
French intelligence. We have all the information about the terrorists.
Question 27: There are hundreds of French fighting with ISIS in
Syria. Did you arrest some of them? Are there some French people from
ISIS now in Syrian jails?
President Assad: No, in the prisons we don’t have any of them,
we only have information, because the majority of those jihadists,
they come here to fight and to die and to go to Heaven, that’s
their ideology. So they’re not ready to go to any prison.
Question 28: So, there are none in jail?
President Assad: No, in jail we don’t have any of them.
Question 29: There are some people nowadays in France, some
politicians, some MPs, you have received some of them these last days,
they say that it’s time to dialogue with you. What initiative
would you be ready to take to convince the others that you can become
a partner for dialogue?
President Assad: With them?
Question 30: With France.
5
President Assad: They have to convince me first, that they don’t
support terrorists, that they are not involved in the blood shedding
of the Syrian people first. They made the mistake regarding Syria,
we didn’t kill any French or European people.
We didn’t help terrorists in your country. We didn’t
help the Charlie Hebdo. You helped the terrorists, so your country,
Western officials, should convince us that they don’t
support terrorists. But we are ready for any dialogue, taking into
consideration that it’s going to be for the interest of the
Syrian citizens.
How can we make dialogue with a regime that supports terrorists in
our country?
Question 31: So at this moment, you are not interested in dialogue
with France.
President Assad: No, we are always interested in dialogue with anyone,
but that is based on the policy. How can we make dialogue with a
regime that supports terrorists in our country, and what for?
That’s the question. When they change their policy, we’ll
be ready to make dialogue, but without that policy, there’s
no aim for the dialogue. You don’t make dialogue for the sake
of dialogue; you make it in order to reach certain results, and that
result for me is for this government to stop supporting the terrorists
in my country.
Question 32: So, you would have no message to send to Francois Hollande
in the objective of dialogue?
President Assad: I think the main message that should be sent to him
is by the French people, and the poll in France will tell you what
message Hollande should listen to, which is, as the most unpopular
president in the history of France since the 50s, should take care of
his population and prevent terrorists from coming to France. For me,
as somebody who suffering with his citizens, with the other citizens
in Syria, from terrorists, I think the most important message is what
you’ve been seeing in France is only the tip of the iceberg.
When you talk about terrorism, you have a full mountain under the
sea. Be aware of this mountain that will inflict your society.
Question 33: When John Kerry, the United States, said perhaps we will
have dialogue with Mr. Bashar Assad, with President Assad, after he
came back to another position, but you said ok, these are words, I want
acts, I’m ready for dialogue. So, you are ready for dialogue?
France is the spearhead that supports terrorism in Syria
President Assad: Of course, we are ready. I said we are ready, with
every country in this world, including the great powers in the world,
including France. But I said dialogue should be based on a certain
policy. The spearhead against Syria, the spearhead that supports
terrorism in Syria, was first France, second UK, not the US this
time. Obama acknowledged that the moderate opposition is illusive..
he said that it is fantasy.
Question 34: He said it’s a phantasm to think that we could
arm them and they could win the war, but he didn’t say there
were no moderate opposition.
President Assad: Exactly. What’s the meaning of “we could
arm them and they couldn’t win the war?” What does it
mean? What does fantasy mean? They said they’re going to arm
the moderate opposition. Can you tell me what is it, where it is? We
don’t see it. We live in Syria, you live in France. I live
here, I don’t find it to fight it, if we have to fight it. We
don’t find it.
Question 35: You say there are foreign countries, too much foreign
countries, involved in the Syria conflict, but without Iranian support,
without Hezbollah support, would you be able to fight against terrorism
now? I mean, you denounced that foreign countries are involved in
Syria, but on your part there is Iranian and Hezbollah support for you.
President Assad: There’s a big difference between intervention
and invitation. Every country, every government in the world,
every state, has the right to invite any other country or party or
organization to help in any domain, while no country has the right to
intervene without invitation. So, we invited Hezbollah. We didn’t
invite the Iranians, they’re not here, they didn’t send
any troops.
Question 36: There are no Iranians here fighting with you?
President Assad: No, no, they don’t fight. We have regular
relations with Iran for more than three decades. We have commanders,
officers coming and going between the two countries based on the
cooperation that existed between us for a long time. This is different
from fighting. So, we as a government have the right to have such
kind of cooperation, but France and other countries don’t have
the right to support anyone within our country. This is a breach of
the international law, this is a breach of our sovereignty, this a
breach of the values that they’ve been proudly talking about -
or allegedly some of them talk about - for decades now, maybe for
centuries. One of these values is democracy.
Is it democracy to send armaments to terrorists? To support rebels?
Do I have the right to support the terrorists of Charlie Hebdo or
something similar?
Question 37: You know what the French Prime Minister said recently
about you. He said “he’s a butcher.” What’s
your response?
President Assad: First of all, let me be frank with you. The statements
of the officials in France, no-one is taking them seriously now, for
one reason: because France is a satellite somehow to the American
policy in the region. It’s not independent, it doesn’t
have the weight, it doesn’t have the credibility.
This is first. Second, as an official, you always care about the
opinion of the population and Syrain citizens. I’m not made
in France or any other country. I’m here because of the Syrian
citizens, and that’s what you have to take care of.
Question 38: Do you think, one day, you will win this war, and that
everybody, everything will go on like before, and Syria will go like
before, with nothing changed?
President Assad: No, nothing should be as before, because you make
things as before means you didn’t develop, you didn’t
learn from the conflict. This conflict has many lessons. We have to
learn from the lessons, and we have to make things not like before,
but better, and there’s a big difference.
Question 39: And with Bashar Assad ruling Syria?
President Assad: I don’t care about this. I care about what the
Syrian people want. If they want Bashar al-Assad, he will stay. If
they don’t want him, he has to leave right now. I mean, how
can he govern without the support of his public? Can he? He cannot.
Question 40: How can you know that you have the support of your
population?
President Assad: First of all, when you don’t have support,
they won’t support the army, you will not withstand for four
years. How can you withstand without their support?
Question 41: Perhaps they’re scared.
President Assad: They are 23 millions. How can 23 millions be scared
of one person, or one intelligence, or one government? That’s
not realistic, not rational.
Question 42: You think it’s democracy now in Syria? You think
people can really say what they think?
President Assad: No, we were on the way to democracy, it’s a
process, it’s a long way. There’s no place you reach it,
you say this is democracy. If you want to compare me to the West, to
France, and other countries, no, you are much ahead of us, definitely,
because of your history and because of many other circumstances and
factors. If you want to compare me to your closest friend, Saudi
Arabia, of course we are democratic. So, it depends on how you
compare me.
Question 43: If you were convinced that leaving the power would mean
peace for Syria, would you do it?
President Assad: Without hesitation. If that were the case, without
hesitation, I would leave of course. If I’m the reason of
conflict in my country, I shouldn’t be here. That’s
self-evident.
Question 44: I wanted to show you another photograph. This is Gilles
Jacquier. He was a journalist in our channel, France 2. He was
killed here in Syria 3 years ago. You had promised an investigation
about that to know who killed him. What can you tell us about this
investigation today?
President Assad: Regardless of the allegations at that time that
we killed him, he was in a residential area under the control of
the government, and he was killed by a mortar, not by a bullet, so
the self-evident thing is that the government wouldn’t shell
itself or the residential area of its supporters by mortars. So,
it’s very clear, everybody knows, and many French media at the
time acknowledged that he was killed by a mortar that was shelled
by what you call the opposition, actually they are terrorists. So,
he was definitely killed by them, but if you want to about - are you
asking about the investigation?
Question 45: Yes. There has been an investigation? Would you give
the result of this investigation you have to prove for French justice?
President Assad: No, we don’t have to prove. We have legal
procedures, and whenever we have any crime in Syria, we follow these
procedures, like any other country. You have a judicial system in
Syria, you have regular procedures; so if you want to know about the
details, after this interview you can be referred to the involved or
interested institution.
Question 46: And you would ok to give this information to French
justice?
President Assad: Of course, we don’t have any problem.
Question 47: If French justice would like to send investigators here,
policemen, judge, would you be willing to?
President Assad: That depends on the agreement between the two
governments, if you have agreement or, let’s say, a treaty or
such a thing, regarding the judicial systems in the two countries
and the cooperation between these two systems, we don’t have
a problem, but it’s not a political decision.
Question 48: Thank you, Mr. President.
President Assad: Thank you for coming.
http://www.sana.sy/en/?p=37034